Hooker situation

@balmain-boy said in [Hooker situation](/post/1303007) said:
@russell said in [Hooker situation](/post/1302987) said:
@upthetigers said in [Hooker situation](/post/1302779) said:
Liddle can't play 80 minutes so who will also play hooker?

Why can't he?

A player that's spent most of the past 5 years injured isn't suddenly going to be expected to front up 80 mins a week. That's reckless management. Ease his workload and fitness

Lots of hookers don't play 80 mins these days with the speed of the ruck.

Can he play 80. Yes. Should be be expected to straight away? No

That was what I am saying.

@upthetigers said "Liddle can't play 80 minutes"

I said "why can't he"

As you said - "Can he play 80. Yes. Should be be expected to straight away? No"

However there is nothing to say he can't - it is best to use him to our best advantage. Whether that is 80 min. or 20 min.
 
@magpieger said in [Hooker situation](/post/1302996) said:
I don't know alot about Jake Simpkin, does anyone know what attributes he possesses that people have big wraps on him for?

Strong as an ox I think could be the best nrl player in the comp
 
@gnr4life said in [Hooker situation](/post/1303011) said:
@jedi_tiger said in [Hooker situation](/post/1303009) said:
@gnr4life said in [Hooker situation](/post/1302965) said:
@jedi_tiger said in [Hooker situation](/post/1302944) said:
@aj1 said in [Hooker situation](/post/1302917) said:
Liddle will prove a lot of doubters wrong. He's the biggest he's ever been, he's had his best offseason yet (especially being injury free), and for the first time he will likely start the season as our preferred hooker, receiving plenty of playing time. For added motivation, he's off contract and has a potential successor nipping at his heels.
For the people wanting Simpkin over Liddle, have you actually seen him play or are you going off the hype? I admit I haven't seen him play a full game of any grade.

cleary was keen on Jake Simpkin so was Brisbane and Melbourne storm
He will be good, Robbie Farah was young when he started too
Liddle is a solid hooker but Simpkin could be future rep player and some say equal to Grant at same age and also under 18's Qld hooker
if we dont play him at least at 14 some time this year we will lose him as he won't want to be stuck behind Liddle for 2022

He will play first grade, but even if he doesn’t, a kid whose never played first grade is going to call the shots on what he wants to do in 2022? Yeah nah

well we didn't play the Fox and look what happened he went elsewhere
Liddle has only played 43 games
either way we have two good options

He was off contract, Simpkin won’t be. As usual, you concoct little fantasy scenarios based on nothing more than what you want to happen

he signed prior to playing first grade!
I forgot you are always the expert
 
@gnr4life said in [Hooker situation](/post/1303011) said:
@jedi_tiger said in [Hooker situation](/post/1303009) said:
@gnr4life said in [Hooker situation](/post/1302965) said:
@jedi_tiger said in [Hooker situation](/post/1302944) said:
@aj1 said in [Hooker situation](/post/1302917) said:
Liddle will prove a lot of doubters wrong. He's the biggest he's ever been, he's had his best offseason yet (especially being injury free), and for the first time he will likely start the season as our preferred hooker, receiving plenty of playing time. For added motivation, he's off contract and has a potential successor nipping at his heels.
For the people wanting Simpkin over Liddle, have you actually seen him play or are you going off the hype? I admit I haven't seen him play a full game of any grade.

cleary was keen on Jake Simpkin so was Brisbane and Melbourne storm
He will be good, Robbie Farah was young when he started too
Liddle is a solid hooker but Simpkin could be future rep player and some say equal to Grant at same age and also under 18's Qld hooker
if we dont play him at least at 14 some time this year we will lose him as he won't want to be stuck behind Liddle for 2022

He will play first grade, but even if he doesn’t, a kid whose never played first grade is going to call the shots on what he wants to do in 2022? Yeah nah

well we didn't play the Fox and look what happened he went elsewhere
Liddle has only played 43 games
either way we have two good options

He was off contract, Simpkin won’t be. As usual, you concoct little fantasy scenarios based on nothing more than what you want to happen

He won't sit behind Liddle for 2021 and 2022 someone will offer him and he will be gone
don't think we can carry both as they are both good players
 
@balmain-boy said in [Hooker situation](/post/1303006) said:
@magpieger said in [Hooker situation](/post/1302996) said:
I don't know alot about Jake Simpkin, does anyone know what attributes he possesses that people have big wraps on him for?

He's a strong runner, very quick out of dummy half and stocky legs so not easy to pull down. Has a decent short kicking game, a good pass and has a big work ethic in defence.

He's a more balanced overall player than Liddle, but Liddle's delivery is possibly better



Nice to know about the short kicking. Will bring back the string to our bow in attack when Robbie finished up. Also excited by the fact he's quick. Looking forward to seeing one quick DH replaced by another to send the defense reeling in disarray.
 
@geo said in [Hooker situation](/post/1303002) said:
@jc99 said in [Hooker situation](/post/1302999) said:
@geo said in [Hooker situation](/post/1302991) said:
With Cammy currently still in limbo and McInnes injured there are no 80 min hookers in the game..even those like Koroisau still were given a breather at times during games....All clubs either carry a hooker or utility who can play hooker on the bench..

Why all of a sudden do people think Wests Tigers wont...

With Simpkin and Mbye I think we are in a better position than previous years with the likes of Reynolds, Walters (injured) or Taylor covering previously..

There definitely are plenty of hookers who can play 80 but with the new rules a utility on the bench makes more sense than ever. Even clubs who played their hookers for 80 carried someone on their bench who can cover the backs.

I wouldn't say plenty otherwise they would.. but they didn't....

Reed Mahoney played 80 mins plenty of times but as the season went on they started using a utility off the bench purely because it made sense tactics wise. With how fit these guys are they definitely can do it if asked.
 
@jc99 said in [Hooker situation](/post/1303027) said:
@geo said in [Hooker situation](/post/1303002) said:
@jc99 said in [Hooker situation](/post/1302999) said:
@geo said in [Hooker situation](/post/1302991) said:
With Cammy currently still in limbo and McInnes injured there are no 80 min hookers in the game..even those like Koroisau still were given a breather at times during games....All clubs either carry a hooker or utility who can play hooker on the bench..

Why all of a sudden do people think Wests Tigers wont...

With Simpkin and Mbye I think we are in a better position than previous years with the likes of Reynolds, Walters (injured) or Taylor covering previously..

There definitely are plenty of hookers who can play 80 but with the new rules a utility on the bench makes more sense than ever. Even clubs who played their hookers for 80 carried someone on their bench who can cover the backs.

I wouldn't say plenty otherwise they would.. but they didn't....

Reed Mahoney played 80 mins plenty of times but as the season went on they started using a utility off the bench purely because it made sense tactics wise. With how fit these guys are they definitely can do it if asked.

Worked well for them..
 
@geo said in [Hooker situation](/post/1303028) said:
@jc99 said in [Hooker situation](/post/1303027) said:
@geo said in [Hooker situation](/post/1303002) said:
@jc99 said in [Hooker situation](/post/1302999) said:
@geo said in [Hooker situation](/post/1302991) said:
With Cammy currently still in limbo and McInnes injured there are no 80 min hookers in the game..even those like Koroisau still were given a breather at times during games....All clubs either carry a hooker or utility who can play hooker on the bench..

Why all of a sudden do people think Wests Tigers wont...

With Simpkin and Mbye I think we are in a better position than previous years with the likes of Reynolds, Walters (injured) or Taylor covering previously..

There definitely are plenty of hookers who can play 80 but with the new rules a utility on the bench makes more sense than ever. Even clubs who played their hookers for 80 carried someone on their bench who can cover the backs.

I wouldn't say plenty otherwise they would.. but they didn't....

Reed Mahoney played 80 mins plenty of times but as the season went on they started using a utility off the bench purely because it made sense tactics wise. With how fit these guys are they definitely can do it if asked.

Worked well for them..

That's irrelevant to the point I'm making. Heaps of guys can play 80 minutes when asked but with the game as it is it just makes more sense to carry a utility. I agree that we will most likely carry a utility on the bench for most of the season
 
@tony-soprano said in [Hooker situation](/post/1303020) said:
@magpieger said in [Hooker situation](/post/1302996) said:
I don't know alot about Jake Simpkin, does anyone know what attributes he possesses that people have big wraps on him for?

Strong as an ox I think could be the best nrl player in the comp



Good to hear. Our defense needs to be alot stouter this year.
Also, if he can scoot out and catch the opposition on the back-foot, that strength would help keep alive in the tackle to look for an off-load. Loving it!
 
@magpieger said in [Hooker situation](/post/1303031) said:
@tony-soprano said in [Hooker situation](/post/1303020) said:
@magpieger said in [Hooker situation](/post/1302996) said:
I don't know alot about Jake Simpkin, does anyone know what attributes he possesses that people have big wraps on him for?

Strong as an ox I think could be the best nrl player in the comp



Good to hear. Our defense needs to be alot stouter this year.
Also, if he can scoot out and catch the opposition on the back-foot, that strength would help keep alive in the tackle to look for an off-load. Loving it!

Type of playing that thinks I’ll run over the top of your first.
 
@jedi_tiger said in [Hooker situation](/post/1303024) said:
@gnr4life said in [Hooker situation](/post/1303011) said:
@jedi_tiger said in [Hooker situation](/post/1303009) said:
@gnr4life said in [Hooker situation](/post/1302965) said:
@jedi_tiger said in [Hooker situation](/post/1302944) said:
@aj1 said in [Hooker situation](/post/1302917) said:
Liddle will prove a lot of doubters wrong. He's the biggest he's ever been, he's had his best offseason yet (especially being injury free), and for the first time he will likely start the season as our preferred hooker, receiving plenty of playing time. For added motivation, he's off contract and has a potential successor nipping at his heels.
For the people wanting Simpkin over Liddle, have you actually seen him play or are you going off the hype? I admit I haven't seen him play a full game of any grade.

cleary was keen on Jake Simpkin so was Brisbane and Melbourne storm
He will be good, Robbie Farah was young when he started too
Liddle is a solid hooker but Simpkin could be future rep player and some say equal to Grant at same age and also under 18's Qld hooker
if we dont play him at least at 14 some time this year we will lose him as he won't want to be stuck behind Liddle for 2022

He will play first grade, but even if he doesn’t, a kid whose never played first grade is going to call the shots on what he wants to do in 2022? Yeah nah

well we didn't play the Fox and look what happened he went elsewhere
Liddle has only played 43 games
either way we have two good options

He was off contract, Simpkin won’t be. As usual, you concoct little fantasy scenarios based on nothing more than what you want to happen

He won't sit behind Liddle for 2021 and 2022 someone will offer him and he will be gone
don't think we can carry both as they are both good players

Yep would be sin not to give him a go.
 
@russell said in [Hooker situation](/post/1303000) said:
Jacob Liddle has represented the **Australian Schoolboys** in 2015 and the **New South Wales junior Origin** side twice - although the second time he pulled out to make his Tiger debut.

Jake Simpkin has represented **QLD under 18's** in 2019.

Just to put things in perspective for those who have "Representative stars in their eyes."

Also under 18 Qld schoolboys and should have been australian schoolboys at 17 , under16 origin ,under 15 Qld schoolboys and under 18 Qld confraternity schoolboys
 
@barnzee said in [Hooker situation](/post/1303060) said:
@russell said in [Hooker situation](/post/1303000) said:
Jacob Liddle has represented the **Australian Schoolboys** in 2015 and the **New South Wales junior Origin** side twice - although the second time he pulled out to make his Tiger debut.

Jake Simpkin has represented **QLD under 18's** in 2019.

Just to put things in perspective for those who have "Representative stars in their eyes."

Also under 18 Qld schoolboys and should have been australian schoolboys at 17 , under16 origin ,under 15 Qld schoolboys and under 18 Qld confraternity schoolboys

Sorry forgot about the under 18 origin squad 2018 was 18th man as a 17 year old , and under 20s qld origin squad before covid hit
 
@jedi_tiger said in [Hooker situation](/post/1303063) said:
interesting to see whether Madge plays Jake in the roosters trial or gives him a run against manly

I think they both will get a run. Can anyone confirm whether Liddle played more than 12 games last year? From memory it was about 5-6?
 
@needaname said in [Hooker situation](/post/1303064) said:
@jedi_tiger said in [Hooker situation](/post/1303063) said:
interesting to see whether Madge plays Jake in the roosters trial or gives him a run against manly

I think they both will get a run. Can anyone confirm whether Liddle played more than 12 games last year? From memory it was about 5-6?

Liddle played 6 games in 2020
maybe they will both play against roosters and manly
 
@jedi_tiger said in [Hooker situation](/post/1303066) said:
@needaname said in [Hooker situation](/post/1303064) said:
@jedi_tiger said in [Hooker situation](/post/1303063) said:
interesting to see whether Madge plays Jake in the roosters trial or gives him a run against manly

I think they both will get a run. Can anyone confirm whether Liddle played more than 12 games last year? From memory it was about 5-6?

Liddle played 6 games in 2020
maybe they will both play against roosters and manly

Going off fox sports stats, quite a few of our main players will be available for the first trial. Is it 12 nrl games or less? Or 12 nrl games for the club or less? Tamou, Joffa would be available in the second ruling.

Madden 0
Kei 0
Tulagi 0
Simpkin 0
Cini 0
Tuki 0
Hoffman 1
Laurie 3 (Panthers)
Seyfarth 4
Kepoa 5
Blore 5
Liddle 6
Musgrove 6
Robert’s 6 (South’s)
Packer 7
Walters 8 (injured)
Chee Kam 9
Twal 12
Talau 12
 
@tony-soprano said in [Hooker situation](/post/1303044) said:
@magpieger said in [Hooker situation](/post/1303031) said:
@tony-soprano said in [Hooker situation](/post/1303020) said:
@magpieger said in [Hooker situation](/post/1302996) said:
I don't know alot about Jake Simpkin, does anyone know what attributes he possesses that people have big wraps on him for?

Strong as an ox I think could be the best nrl player in the comp



Good to hear. Our defense needs to be alot stouter this year.
Also, if he can scoot out and catch the opposition on the back-foot, that strength would help keep alive in the tackle to look for an off-load. Loving it!

Type of playing that thinks I’ll run over the top of your first.



Someone who'll take the fight to the opposition 'ey? That says he's a confident lad. I'll take that, but I also hope he has good instincts and footy smarts.
 
@geo said in [Hooker situation](/post/1302927) said:
@happy_tiger said in [Hooker situation](/post/1302918) said:
Sounds like we dodged a bullet with McInnes ...did his ACL at training ..season probably gone

You can't dodge a bullet when the gun was never loaded..

The gun was aimed ...target was acquired ...thats enough
 

Staff online

Back
Top