BenjiMagic96
New member
and the Tigers were interested in signing him…
How many weeks for James Graham
- Thread starter stryker
- Start date
He bit his ear…..he didn't try kill him or threaten to kill his family or anything. People are blowing this way out of proportion, he should get 12 weeks, I think he'll get away with 8\. To anyone saying a full year or banned for life, sorry but you're being absolutely ridiculous.
\
\
_Posted using RoarFEED 2012_
\
\
_Posted using RoarFEED 2012_
GNR4LIFE
Well-known member
Don't forget how at the start of the yr he was rubbing vaso all over his legs to make it harder for tacklers to get ahold of him. Nate Myles did one of the funniest things all yr when he rubbed if off his hands by using Graham's face. God know's how long he was doing that for in SL. Good thing the NRL stamped it out
As for the punishment, you're dreaming if you think he'll get a yr. I'll say 8-10 weeks
As for the punishment, you're dreaming if you think he'll get a yr. I'll say 8-10 weeks
westTAHger
Well-known member
shame that incident over shadowed the game..
hoping he gets minimum 9 weeks.
but as in life we don't always get what we hope for.
hoping he gets minimum 9 weeks.
but as in life we don't always get what we hope for.
Marshall_magic
New member
12 weeks, Morrin got 8 and Zillman got 5, this was worse than both of them.
innsaneink
Well-known member
He shouldve been sent off….and THEN given 12-14 weeks
It was right in front of the touchy, he was watching it unfold
http://www.foxsports.com.au/league/nrl-premiership/canterbury-bankstown-prop-james-graham-faces-a-hefty-suspension-referred-straight-to-judiciary/story-fn2mcuj6-1226485851308
It was right in front of the touchy, he was watching it unfold
http://www.foxsports.com.au/league/nrl-premiership/canterbury-bankstown-prop-james-graham-faces-a-hefty-suspension-referred-straight-to-judiciary/story-fn2mcuj6-1226485851308
tig_prmz
Well-known member
another bulldog… low life scumbag.
tig_prmz
Well-known member
agree with ink, what benefit did slater or the storm get by suspension? ridiculous. [This word has been automatically removed] should've been sent off
andrew 474
New member
season
Reprehensible, should miss half the season, plus any international matches at the end of the year. He was forcing Slater to the ground, already had the upper hand so I don't know why he felt it necessary to bite him.
Dog by name, dog by nature it would seem.
Dog by name, dog by nature it would seem.
happy_tiger
Well-known member
@alexaki said:
Could of been something beforehand that no one saw . Try biting someone with a mouthguard hard enough to break the skin
GoldXR50Leroy
New member
@stryker said:
Could of been something beforehand that no one saw . Try biting someone with a mouthguard hard enough to break the skin
The way he was facing his upper teeth would have been on the back side of the ear and bottom teeth on that inside part of the ear. They wear mouthguards on the top row, NOT the bottom row of teeth. Hence the broken skin in that part of the ear.
Given the first 2 weeks are worked off in official trials, I say 10-12 + 2 for trials.
The way he was facing his upper teeth would have been on the back side of the ear and bottom teeth on that inside part of the ear. They wear mouthguards on the top row, NOT the bottom row of teeth. Hence the broken skin in that part of the ear.
Given the first 2 weeks are worked off in official trials, I say 10-12 + 2 for trials.
innsaneink
Well-known member
@happy tiger said:
Been there- done that eh Happy??
happy_tiger
Well-known member
@innsaneink said:
No mate never wore a mouthguard , they used to make me gag
Blackpearl
New member
@innsaneink said:
x 2 ink .. it was blatantly obvious as it all unfolded, could not beleive it took 3 reviews before the nine commentary team said graham could in some trouble here. why didnt the video ref let the refs know what happened in such a blatant dog act so he should have been sent off. anyway as they say lie with dogs etc etc
innsaneink
Well-known member
Pleading not guilty
I wobder if Slater or other Storm players will be called to give evidence?
Maybr the grub is hoping they want it all to go away, that they dont front….too late for that I think
I wobder if Slater or other Storm players will be called to give evidence?
Maybr the grub is hoping they want it all to go away, that they dont front….too late for that I think
happy_tiger
Well-known member
@Blackpearl said:
Supposedly if the video referee had a clearer view he would of been sent off
