How politicking and empire building ruined Wests Tigers

Aladinsane

New member
How politicking and empire building ruined Wests Tigers
By Nick Tedeschi

If the joint venture continues to focus on the past it will never find a way out of its current mess.
The seeds of the Wests Tigers’ calamitous situation were sown nearly two decades ago, a time that seems increasingly ancient, the dark days of the Super League war, when Rupert Murdoch marched on the game.

It was the traditional Sydney clubs that had the most to lose. Those who sided with the rebel league – Canterbury, Penrith, Cronulla – rolled the dice and won. Eastern Suburbs, all money and power, thrived. Dennis Fitzgerald’s incomparable politicking put Parramatta in a prime position. Souths were cast out but on passion and persistence returned. The Saints bowed to the obvious and joined with Illawarra in what was more a takeover than merger. Manly got the good end of a joint venture deal with the luckless Bears and then tanked until they returned as a sole entity.

For both Western Suburbs and Balmain, two foundation clubs, a joint venture was the only option. Both were struggling on the field and off it. Merger or death. Both let pragmatism prevail. Rugby league types have always had a sixth sense for survival.

It was the genuine parity of the joint venture – neither team had the chips to force a takeover – that created the power vacuum that has left the club in the depths of despair, the Tigers on their knees and at their lowest point following weeks of embarrassing in-fighting, culminating in Saturday’s shameful 64-6 defeat to North Queensland.

The dynamic of the Wests Tigers, at board level, is as unique as it is constricting. The Balmain faction have typically held the power, at least until the costly debacle that has been the stalled redevelopment of the Balmain Leagues Club, now an eyesore on Victoria Road and a political poison pill in the halls of power. The Wests side – hardly united themselves with the Ashfield and Campbelltown factions bitter enemies – have supplied the money. The chairman of the club is limited to a two-year term, alternating between factions, reinforcing the “us and them” mentality that has undermined the club from the beginning and ensured long-term planning is not a priority.

In 14 years, no efforts have been made to put ancient enmities aside and run the Wests Tigers as a new, fresh, single club. In true rugby league tradition, small time politicking and empire building has trumped all.

There have been times when the club have been able to papier-mâché over the problems. They did manage an unlikely premiership in 2005 and their on-field combination of transcendent talent and an exciting brand made them not too long ago the darling of the league.

For many years the club’s experienced coach Tim Sheens seemed to keep the Tigers’ ship at least relatively stable. The club did little to help itself but for the most part of the Sheens reign, there was little self-harm.

The departure of CEO Steve Noyce in 2008 was a pivotal moment for the club. A respected administrator, his successors have lacked his steady-hand or disdain for club politics.

The Tigers made a rare splash into free agency in 2011, spending big on Storm forward Adam Blair. The move forced out prop Bryce Gibbs and the talented Andrew Fifita, who both headed to Cronulla.

The move was not a popular one among the playing group and when extremely popular duo Chris Heighington and Beau Ryan had their contract talks stalled and delayed until they both upped and signed with the Sharks. It was the Archduke Ferdinand moment for this Tigers’ war.

And so began the winter of the Tigers’ discontent.

The players turned on Sheens. It was widely reported that Benji Marshall and a key group of senior players were hostile to the coach. In late September, buried in the grand final build-up, Sheens was sacked, opening up another bitter, self-inflicted battle that only ended earlier this month, nearly two years after he was deposed. The feud – which landed in court – got so ugly that Sheens was not invited to a function honouring the Tigers’ greatest team in July.

It was a moment of realisation for the players, who came to understand that in a club without leadership or front office experience, they held the cards. They quickly soured on new coach Mick Potter, a strong disciplinarian who has been chided as a poor communicator. Marshall bailed to rugby union. Robbie Farah told Gorden Tallis that Potter couldn’t coach, a claim he has not denied.

Whether Farah still doubts Potter’s credentials or not is beside the point. He set the wheels in motion. And when he could be painted as being against Potter, those on the board and in the front office who wanted a new coach already had the set-up. It was a simple case of paint by numbers.

Farah could be positioned as the bad guy. A player revolt against the coach was not a hard case to lay out. Everyone would be happy with the outcome. A faction across the club – players, front office personnel, board members, the man himself – reportedly wanted to promote assistant Todd Payten.

Except nothing is easy at the Wests Tigers.

Potter was remarkably saved by the board’s ineptitude when they delayed sacking their coach until season’s end despite it being reported he would be axed following the defeat to the Dragons.
Payten, reportedly told he would be promoted, could now be forced out of the club.

Renowned as a prickly character, Farah didn’t take kindly to being painted as the bad guy or as having his private views aired publicly. He went on the attack Tallis and CEO Grant Mayer, before saying plenty by saying nothing until he accepted a pre-recorded exclusive interview deal with Nine on The Footy Show. His words did not go down well.

Three days after the interview, the Tigers were embarrassed by North Queensland, conceding 64 points and suffering the added humiliation of Johnathan Thurston attempting a conversion left-footed.

Battles continue to rage on many fronts, both hot and cold. The skipper’s reputation has been tarnished. The playing group are rightly being regarded as fickle. The CEO has been marginalised. The board has been shown for what it is – not up to running a rugby league club, a sad state of affairs for a team wrapped up in so much history.

And it is perhaps that history which is suffocating the club. The Balmain faction and the Western Suburbs factions are too concerned with yesterday and not enough with tomorrow. It is the same reactionary, small-time scheming that has hamstrung the game for so long and the same that has kept the Tigers from reaching their potential for most of their existence.

It may not seem it but the best thing to happen to the Tigers is the Balmain board growing broke. The NRL’s forced intervention should bring an end to the bickering and back-biting. The three independent directors will be a majority on the board until Balmain can pay back their debt – if ever – and even then on a seven-man board both clubs will need to be united to stop any NRL-led modernisation.

It is time to stop thinking about Balmain and Wests and joint ventures and accept that this is a new club. Most fans have moved on. It is time for the powerbrokers at the club to do so as well.

It won’t be enough to save Potter. It probably won’t be enough to save Mayer and it is unlikely it will be enough to save Farah’s reputation but it will be a rare positive step forward for a club that has spent too long looking back.
#########################################################

IMO ,Never has a sports journalist got our club"s current situation and our club's history so right !!

Bring on the Next 15 years
 
From my very limited understanding, a lot of that story seems to ring very true…...

_Posted using RoarFEED V.4_
 
After I pick up Powerball tomorrow night I'll fix up that loan for a spot on the board… then the real fun would start! (actually surprised Harry didn't do it - he doesn't need Powerball)
 
Fair and accurate. If only all articles were written in such a manner.
 
@dazza65 said:
From my very limited understanding, a lot of that story seems to ring very true…...

_Posted using RoarFEED V.4_

Yes which makes it a very sad story indeed. I'm actually wondering if this club will survive much longer, tbh.
 
@Flippedy said:
@dazza65 said:
From my very limited understanding, a lot of that story seems to ring very true…...

_Posted using RoarFEED V.4_

Yes which makes it a very sad story indeed. I'm actually wondering if this club will survive much longer, tbh.

For the short term we should be right Flip TV rights demand they have 16 sides

But relocation could be an issue , with Balmain having no voting rights the independent board will win any vote 3-2 on ANY issue

What's that saying be careful what you wish for ??
 
I doubt the NRL would be willing to give up on South Western Sydney…Wests Tigers are essential to the area..the NRL would not throw that away easily...

As for the article...well written sums it up nicely
 
**It was the genuine parity of the joint venture – neither team had the chips to force a takeover – that created the power vacuum that has left the club in the depths of despair, the Tigers on their knees** and at their lowest point following weeks of embarrassing in-fighting, culminating in Saturday’s shameful 64-6 defeat to North Queensland.

This is something Ive said for over 10 years.
50/50 has NOT worked….its held us back.

The long term deal with ANZ is an ideal preparation for the NRL to relocate us to WA.
Ten years, maybe not even that long....several seasons of attuning our fans here to ANZ could see an interstate Wests Tigers play four or five away games at ANZ per season, which could - to the NRLs way of thinking, see us primed for a move.
WTs wouldnt be totally severed from the current fanbase that DO patronise the stadium.
Its one way they can relocate us yet still be able to keep current members/supporters involved ($$$) in the game.
 
Blocker on 360 tonight kept the story bubbling along.

Said he wrote last Fridays article in response to a section of the player group trying to run the club.

If I spoke to the press about anything related to my job i would be fired. Just saying…..
 
@Geo. said:
I doubt the NRL would be willing to give up on South Western Sydney…Wests Tigers are essential to the area..the NRL would not throw that away easily...

As for the article...well written sums it up nicely

I think they've already lost the area, Geo - Soccer and AFL are very popular and growing rapidly. As others have mentioned, relocation looks to be a real possibility and unless it's a move to the Central Coast (which I doubt it would be) then I won't have a team to support anymore, sadly. How could I possibly support a team based in Perth? It just wouldn't be right.
 
Balmain faction ? surely he means fraction !

Balmain club growing broke ? surely he means going broke !

Written like a republican selling the masses a NWO.

The club needs relocating like a hole in the head. I think the right thing to do is for the area of Campbelltown to go it alone before losing that base to another sport.

The Balmain area is no longer an NRL stalwart of support , I know it is sad but it is a fact. Though I am sure that the Tiger emblem is worth more to the NRL than many may want to admit or care to think.

Time for the NRL to sort the board out and then decide after a great load of consideration on the future of the Wests Tigers , make no mistake they know relocating is a last resort at best.

To consider this article as a fair evaluation is tripe , to me its just another smack in the eye , and that eye ? Is that of a tiger.
 
The article got most of it right,except the bit about most fans have moved on from their Wests or Balmain roots, you only have to read the stuff on this forum to see their are still a lot of people who are just like our board in living in the past.

Fingers crossed the events of the last month might change a lot of peoples mind
 
Depressing read :frowning: ( had to take a couple of my happy pills after reading it :smiley: ) Sad state of affairs to say the least.
 
@supercoach said:
The article got most of it right,except the bit about most fans have moved on from their Wests or Balmain roots, you only have to read the stuff on this forum to see their are still a lot of people who are just like our board in living in the past.

Fingers crossed the events of the last month might change a lot of peoples mind

Fingers crossed SC , but if anything it has probably done the exact opposite

When you look at the big picture ,many don't realize how dire things really are
 
Yah. Very sad.
Unless the hyaenas give the old bone up, I think we're gone. Time for a think fellas, you're a part of this.
 
if the nrl try and move the team interstate or anywhere else for that matter they would lose a large supporter base forever.

i think next 5-10yrs we should be definitely looking at making homebush our main stadium and our suburban grounds 1-2 games per year each, max.

our branding is strong, if the board and front+back office can get their act together and we have a decent run of luck with injuries we should be ok coming out of the next 3+ years.
 
The truth of the matter is - The JV was set up poorly. This faction based bickering (yes I do it too) has white anted the club.

For the first time since I was a kid playing footy myself, I watch AFL on the weekend. Looking for someone to support as passionately as I did the Magpies and as passionately as I tried to follow the JV. It is with sadness that I will struggle to support WT anymore, seeing the old Magpie (and Balmain) killed off bothers me and I know I should move on, but I can't. I truly fear the club as a whole will cease to exist or move interstate within 10 years. Just my feeling.
 
50-50 has worked 1 premiers cup and 2 near misses and a team with until last year one of the most wanted on TV.

What went wrong is Balmain going broke. Those financial shortcomings are the reason we struggle lately and THE ONLY reason we have independent directors coming.

Anyway if people don't want 50 50 they must be wanting a Balmain takeover because many here were very hostile to Wests having more control in view of Balmain s recent trouble.
 

Latest posts

Members online

Back
Top