Interchange Bench

@crouching_tiger said:
@Geo. said:
yet couldn't feel as though they could bring it up with his Coach or others in the Senior Playing group….....

i didn't say he didn't bring it up with his Coach or fellow players, Neither did he. So for all we know he MAY have…

You have jumped to a conclusion there which is why you my find it strange..
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

Exactly Right…..I'm not doubting what you say at all....but if the subject comes up again can you ask the player the first 2 questions...I think a lot of people including yourself would like to know the answer........
 
sheens has publicly stated that royce looks after the bench

i know a balmain trainer and he has told me this is also the case
 
Sheens use, or Simmons use of the bench is the most frustrating part of watching the Tigers play because of this reason as CT has alluded to. The thing that gets me frustrated is that clearly the players want to win the game and obviously the coach would too, so why not be flexible in using the bench and adjusting interchanges to suit the conditions and the way the game is unfolding??? Keeping it set to a strict framework generally does not work.

Be nice to see this change in 2010 but it sounds like we may be complaining about the use of the interchange bench a whole more for awhile yet.
 
@Geo. said:
@Buckets of blood said:
I wouldnt say its serious.
I'd say its very common place.

Someone once described players in general when discussing off field behaviour, to get to the top you need to know what you want and be forthright & headstrong as well as be a handy footy player, same for coaches….with such strong personalities over the course of an entire season, its never always going to be smooth sailing....

I didn't say it doesn't happen but what I find strange is that the SENIOR player would air it in Public….......
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

It wasnt said in public, it was between two people over "a few quiet drinks"

The OP made it public.
 
As much as I HATE to confirm anything CT claims… I can confirm that the conversation took place as I was there. So you are a bit off in claiming it was between "2 people over drinks" CT.

So to the doubters this story is a fact, and trust me I would love to prove otherwise as I am not a fan of CT myself.

I must say it was very dissapointing to hear what this player was saying, but it does explain a lot. And I certainly hope that things change next season, I have had it with the frustrating choices on the utilising of our bench of past.
 
So how many were there?
2, 4, 8….whats it matter, its way more public now than it was before, the nets tentacles reach all nooks and crannys of the globe....get the point now?
 
It was a 3 way convo. That is why the name of the player will NEVER be revealed on here.

But anyway, this isn't about the player in question, it's more about how the interchange bench is being used..
 
Interesting, so we've had players sitting on the bench for 70+ minutes, and they knew there were going to be sitting there that long if no one got injured? that can't be too good for the morale of the team
 
@Buckets of blood said:
It wasnt said in public, it was between two people over "a few quiet drinks"

The OP made it public.
Click to expand...

Your right my mistake….it was a clandestine three-way....... :slight_smile:

After reading BRET's post........... seems there was more Public there........
 
@Geo. said:
@Buckets of blood said:
It wasnt said in public, it was between two people over "a few quiet drinks"

The OP made it public.

Your right my mistake….it was a clandestine three-way....... :slight_smile:

After reading BRET's post........... seems there was more Public there........
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

Yeh…all three of joe public, actually 2 joe public and one dissatisfied senior nrl player - yep, your mistake.
 
It was only the 3 of us, and there is no way the player will be named. But the conversation did happen and the conversation has never been discussed outside of those 3 people until now.

The point of this topic is that there is a very stale and stubbon way our bench is being used that not only the fans seem upset about it but also some players.
 
@willow said:
so why not be flexible in using the bench and adjusting interchanges to suit the conditions and the way the game is unfolding??? Keeping it set to a strict framework generally does not work.
Click to expand...

And that is why folks the WT seem to be losing more than they win. The Top 8 system is pathetic enough that to play semi finals footy you can actually lose more than you win and make the 8.
So a 50% win ratio can almost guarantee you a berth in the semis, yet teams with such talent for the past 2-3 years can still not get over a 50% strike rate is unnacceptable regardless of how injuries have struck. Injuries hit EVERY team in the NRL, some teams worse than others in certain years so that is also an unnacceptable excuse in any regard. The prostituting of the home ground advantage has not helped the WT cause either, but at least the club is slowly making amends in that department, and we can all accept the fact of $$$ being a factor for the survival of the club, so it is a neccessary evil for the next few years until LO and CS can be at an acceptable level for the modern game.

Another bench moment i recall which left me scratching my head this year was, why in hell David Gower on debut was left on the bench for so long to have a peck of the scraps of a match which the WT had under control against the Bulldogs. He got crap gametime and was played out of his usual positions and barely got to showcase his talent or abilities. And now i know that the interchange times are virtually set in concrete, it all makes sense now…
 
@MAFIA said:
Nothing wrong with what sheensy has done here 1 player has told you this just a thought here how many games has it won us, me thinks this player was a fringe player and didnt get enough time on the park, i think sheens has done it for his whole coaching life…... now how many premierships has the bloke won i think his ideas are working just fine
Click to expand...

Bwahahaha you GUESS a fringe player who didn't get enough game time, where i have clearly stated was a SENIOR player. You want to drag up the crap about how many premierships he's won line out of the bag. No one who supports WT give a rats about his track record before he was at this club.
You ask how many games has it won us??

2003 24 7 17 0 - 29.17%
2004 24 10 14 0 - 41.67%
2005 28 18 10 0 - 64.28%
2006 24 10 14 0 - 41.66%
2007 24 11 13 0 - 45.83%
2008 24 11 13 0 - 45.8%
2009 24 12 12 0 - 50%

And here are the results(just for you)just before he was forced to resign from The Cowboys:

1997 18 5 11 2 - 27.78%
1998 24 9 15 0 - 37.5%
1999 24 4 19 1 - 16.67%
2000 26 7 19 0 - 26.92%
2001 11 2 8 1 - 18.18%

Knock yourself out Al Capone…
 
I don't see the big deal about all of this. Who cares if a player said something? Alot of players wouldn't agree 100% with what the coach decides. Robbie Farah was quoted in the paper the other day saying that he had been concerned with the recruitment we had over the last few years and that he had shared his concerns with Sheens about it many times.
 
@alien said:
I don't see the big deal about all of this. Who cares if a player said something? Alot of players wouldn't agree 100% with what the coach decides. Robbie Farah was quoted in the paper the other day saying that he had been concerned with the recruitment we had over the last few years and that he had shared his concerns with Sheens about it many times.
Click to expand...

Well said
 
well, when this happens again next year (I think it's more of a when rather than an if) at least we'll know what's going on…. not that that will help during the game when everyone else is screaming for an interchange though
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Members online

Total: 354 (members: 20, guests: 334)
Back
Top