Interpretation...

mtd

New member
im over being over it…

i watched games over the weekend and i cant even keep count of how many contradictory decisions i see.

i cant buy into the hype this year that QLD are just a team of superstars... NSW were dudded..

rules are rules. black and white. who ever introduced this interpretation business should be moved on ASAP.
 
and again….

cameron smith not being charged by the match review committee when adam blair was suspened the week before...
 
it's a law.. you cant have laws without interpretations.. it's the consistencies with which they interpret it which is frustrating.

i believe inglis should've copped 4-5 weeks, but let's see how they have judged it in the past and how they will do it in the future.

havent seen the cam smith tackle, but surely twisting is worse than pulling 😕
 
@tig_prmz said:
it's a law. you cant have laws without interpretations.. it's the consistencies with which they interpret it which is frustrating.

rules are rules.
if blair is given 1 week for something, cam smith does the same, he should also get 1 week.
the option to 'interpret' is putting decisions in the hands of people that are not sticking to the rules.
the whole thing is a farce.
 
Back
Top