@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
Thats the kicker.
I think that is a bit of over-simplification.
His son wants to play where he has grown up playing in a group he has developed successful working combinations with. That group has made positive inroads towards finals football. So should he stick with them, or come over to a team that is still building and some time away from successful finals football, just because his dad coaches there?
I understand why Nathan would want to stay at Penrith, they are ahead of us at the moment in every single facet, all excepting one - his father coaching at WT.
The point is, if Ivan really believed that he would stay at WT and that if he had confidence in his own coaching abilities to mould us into a genuine force, then he could say to his son to come over and together they can make WT as good as or Better than Penrith.
But no, Nathan staying at Penrith says to me that his own father couldn't/didn't convince him to come over to WT (we know Ivan wants to coach his son), and that could really only be because of one reason.
Ivan believes WT will not be as good as Penrith in terms of an overall package.
That's what will make it hard to convince other players to come over, when Ivan's own son has insufficient confidence in his own father's ability to get our team to a decent level.
That's really stretching a long bow imo….
You don't get as far in the game as Ivan has without confidence.... And maybe, just maybe... He's allowing his son to be an adult, make his own decisions for what he believes will make him happy
Talk about twisting things :unamused:
I agree with ink.
Nathan is old enough to make his own decisions and it's evident that he has the talent to play where he chooses, rather than being dependent on the good graces of his father.
On record that he'd love to be coached by his Dad, but he's just signed a deal that keeps him very well paid at his current club for the next 6 years (until end 2024). Could Tigers have matched the value and duration of such a deal? I'd argue that most Tigers fans are happy that we did not, imagine the uproar if we'd signed Nathan to a 6-year deal.
It's different for Penrith, he's a foundation junior player there and has come through the grades with lots of their other juniors. Nathan currently has more intrinsic value to Penrith than to Tigers, same as Luke Brooks has more stock with Tigers than elsewhere.
I personally don't think it says anything about Tigers or Ivan's coaching. In fact in his Q&A with nrl.com, Nathan stated that he felt Penrith weren't far off a grand final, but also that Tigers were not so far off either, in his opinion.
Quite feasible the kid just preferred not to leave his junior club and his mates, and was offered a very long and lucrative deal that made it easy enough to sign on. Any talk of moving to Tigers was media speculation only, not confirmed by the club, and almost certainly the Clearys knew such talk would drive up Nathan's price.
Going off happy's conspiracy post, perhaps the entire noise about Ivan coaching Nathan and possibly bringing him to the Tigers was simply to drive up his price at Penrith? Unlikely, but it certainly doesn't harm Nathan's stock.
And lastly Nathan will be 26 when his new deal expires. His Dad will do well to still be coaching a FG side there, as coaches don't get 8-year runs without some level of success. But, barring injury or massive form drop, Nathan has at least 1 or 2 decent contracts left in his career.