@Cairnstigers said in [JAC](/post/1252240) said:@Tiger5150 said in [JAC](/post/1252179) said:@Cairnstigers said in [JAC](/post/1252172) said:@Everything-WT said in [JAC](/post/1252167) said:Take this points system dribble elsewhere
It doesn't have to be a points system
A market value would be fare
And this would only need to be used when a player is looking at changing clubs not being re signed at his existing club
Would last five minutes in court if the Players Union (or someone willing to payroll) challenged it. Clear restraint of trade.
Can a $9.4 million cap be thought of as a restraint of trade ?
Because the league has set that figure
What is JAC's value
$600,000 as an untried fullback?
A player has the right to earn as much as possible (we all know and understand that) and that is determined by what a club is willing to pay
Therefore the larger amount offered to a player should set a players value (not undervalued)
And that is the value that should be used and applied against the cap
Or
Think of it as $1 equals 1 point (like flybuys)
Each club has 9,400,000 points to spend
You can only get so much with your points
We can all find reasons for and against and argue till we are black and blue
But the simple thing is the current system of the cap is not working
It needs change
Thats my opinion and I am sure many others agree
The Nrl competition can be much better and this is one way of fixing it
I have thought we need a points system or draft or something else for some time. Under the current system, a club like ours is always disadvantaged as we have to pay overs seemingly all the time. And don't get me started on Third Part Agreements - Uncle Nick.