Josh Reynolds

[avocadoontoast]

What the hell is it with guys attacking the girl to absolve JR? SMH.

To me this looks like a set-up and she is doing everything wrong. I don't understand anyone (male or female) sticking up for her.

Just say it's her house. Why doesn't she leave ? Why create a situation and record it ?

And conversely, I cant understand anyone sticking up for him. You're saying how terrible it is she recorded him, but if he wasn't such a piece of crap there'd be nothing to film.

This is where I think you get it wrong and I think modern society has it wrong. We are playing the side of women are such precious little perfect creatures when they aren't. They can be abusive and it's abusive to record a conversation on the sly like that.

If that is Josh at his worst then he is alright by me. He definitely isn't a criminal and having that uploaded like that into the public domain is sickening.

"he definitely isn't a criminal" - yet he's to appear before the courts in August on domestic violence charges.

On numerous occasions in this thread you've labelled Reynolds as a criminal because he has a pending court case which he is yet to be convicted/acquitted for. By your logic, all people who have had previous court cases, whether found guilty or innocent, are criminals. Enough with the nonsense, please... We are discussing his actions in this video and whether they are legally wrong, not his pending court case which I must capitalise for you: HE HAS NOT BEEN CONVICTED YET. If he was to be convicted, then I'll join you in condemning Josh for his actions but hold it until the courts have decided.

Did I? I don’t believe I directly called him a criminal. The term I used was ‘piece of crap’.

I certainly didn’t say he wasn’t one though.

 

[Strider]

I saw the video. He looks very unwell and should probably step back from any career to work on himself.

 

[cochise]

Question: can the girlfriend be in trouble for filming and publishing without consent, despite the content?

I haven't watched the footage - I refuse to watch stuff obtained without permission.

Good question.

My recollection is that audio can be recorded, but not video in NSW.

#notalawyer

Actually the weird thing is its the opposite! You can record video in NSW but not audio!

 

[jirskyr]

I reckon @woke has a different definition of what is "definite" and what is rumour. Like Latrell is definitely joining Tigers, AJ is definitely getting a release, Josh Reynolds is definitely a criminal.

 

[coivtny]

Question: can the girlfriend be in trouble for filming and publishing without consent, despite the content?

I haven't watched the footage - I refuse to watch stuff obtained without permission.

Good question.

My recollection is that audio can be recorded, but not video in NSW.

#notalawyer

Actually the weird thing is its the opposite! You can record video in NSW but not audio!

It's weird but you are correct.

 

[tigerballs]

What the hell is it with guys attacking the girl to absolve JR? SMH.

To me this looks like a set-up and she is doing everything wrong. I don't understand anyone (male or female) sticking up for her.

Just say it's her house. Why doesn't she leave ? Why create a situation and record it ?

And conversely, I cant understand anyone sticking up for him. You're saying how terrible it is she recorded him, but if he wasn't such a piece of crap there'd be nothing to film.

This is where I think you get it wrong and I think modern society has it wrong. We are playing the side of women are such precious little perfect creatures when they aren't. They can be abusive and it's abusive to record a conversation on the sly like that.

If that is Josh at his worst then he is alright by me. He definitely isn't a criminal and having that uploaded like that into the public domain is sickening.

"he definitely isn't a criminal" - yet he's to appear before the courts in August on domestic violence charges.

On numerous occasions in this thread you've labelled Reynolds as a criminal because he has a pending court case which he is yet to be convicted/acquitted for. By your logic, all people who have had previous court cases, whether found guilty or innocent, are criminals. Enough with the nonsense, please... We are discussing his actions in this video and whether they are legally wrong, not his pending court case which I must capitalise for you: HE HAS NOT BEEN CONVICTED YET. If he was to be convicted, then I'll join you in condemning Josh for his actions but hold it until the courts have decided.

I wonder what the tone of this thread would be if it was a different player in this video, someone we desperately wanted to keep or re-sign?

 

[coivtny]

Deleted posts everywhere! All the info is available to read on the internet. Anyway JR has shown his true colours, he lied to the club the fans and the sponsors when he said he’s never been aggressive towards a woman etc. time for him to be stood down

That's fine if anonymous Twitter accounts want to post unsubstantiated rumours, but we're not having it here. You continue defy repeated requests from the mod team (so far three of us have asked,) to not repost slanderous comments you'll go. Again.

Everything is a “rumour” isn’t it? The person posting it is close to the situation obviously. Close enough to have the video and to know the intimate handling of it by the tigers. Because they don’t work for a newspaper it’s unsubstantiated? If anything it’s the most Substantiated thing with all this.

You've repeated serious unsubstantiated accusations outside of the video itself that are slanderous. I don't care if some random on Twitter is posting it, I don't care if the user is close to him or his ex-partner, they are slanderous and they are not welcome on this forum.

Just ban the flog ....
Then we can all laugh at his latest reincarnation ?

I enjoy his posts. Unless he crosses the line why ban him? The forum can get pretty boring in the off-season and posters like SG, wokesmoke and other incarnations brighten the place up.

 

[Tigerboy]

Question: can the girlfriend be in trouble for filming and publishing without consent, despite the content?

I haven't watched the footage - I refuse to watch stuff obtained without permission.

No. Not in this context

Although, I know for a fact if he wished to drop her in things right now that it’s an invasion of privacy, unfortunately he’s probably going to have to keep his mouth shut until August. Stop it.

 

[Moh]

I reckon @woke has a different definition of what is "definite" and what is rumour. Like Latrell is definitely joining Tigers, AJ is definitely getting a release, Josh Reynolds is definitely a criminal.

Too right mate.

Parasite of the highest order. Loves all this attention.

 

[innsaneink]

I reckon @woke has a different definition of what is "definite" and what is rumour. Like Latrell is definitely joining Tigers, AJ is definitely getting a release, Josh Reynolds is definitely a criminal.

Too right mate.

Parasite of the highest order. Loves all this attention.

Much like Hooper... Lol

:::



:::

 

[Furious1]

I reckon @woke has a different definition of what is "definite" and what is rumour. Like Latrell is definitely joining Tigers, AJ is definitely getting a release, Josh Reynolds is definitely a criminal.

Too right mate.

Parasite of the highest order. Loves all this attention.

Has he been right about anything yet?

 

[Ponyo]

Twitter

Deleted posts everywhere! All the info is available to read on the internet. Anyway JR has shown his true colours, he lied to the club the fans and the sponsors when he said he’s never been aggressive towards a woman etc. time for him to be stood down

That's fine if anonymous Twitter accounts want to post unsubstantiated rumours, but we're not having it here. You continue defy repeated requests from the mod team (so far three of us have asked,) to not repost slanderous comments you'll go. Again.

Everything is a “rumour” isn’t it? The person posting it is close to the situation obviously. Close enough to have the video and to know the intimate handling of it by the tigers. Because they don’t work for a newspaper it’s unsubstantiated? If anything it’s the most Substantiated thing with all this.

You've repeated serious unsubstantiated accusations outside of the video itself that are slanderous. I don't care if some random on Twitter is posting it, I don't care if the user is close to him or his ex-partner, they are slanderous and they are not welcome on this forum.

Just ban the flog ....
Then we can all laugh at his latest reincarnation ?

That man is going to.come back speaking French or Arabic next loolol. For sure

 

[ElleryHanley]

Incredibly disappointing how many people on the forums said it was no big deal....standing over a woman aggressively and threatening to flip, calling her a dog...and a C.....

Apparently that is acceptable.

Anyone who did that at my work would lose their job, but apparently it is okay for a footy player.

The bloke said he had never been aggressive to a woman....the empirical is right there on that video to contradict him, yet people defend it as normal. I sure as hell would not accept my son speaking like that to a woman and I sure as hell hope none of you have daughters who get treated like that.

Might be time I started to follow something else. Half the comments today sound like something from decades ago.

 

[wokesmoke]

Apparently slandering me is ok @culturedbogan. Why aren’t those posts being deleted?

 

[HowDugWT]

I’m confused what’s happening?

It's not good

 

[Tigerboy]

Apparently slandering me is ok @culturedbogan. Why aren’t those posts being deleted?

You will slander just about anyone else.

 

[wokesmoke]

I reckon @woke has a different definition of what is "definite" and what is rumour. Like Latrell is definitely joining Tigers, AJ is definitely getting a release, Josh Reynolds is definitely a criminal.

He will be released. And I’ve never said he’s a criminal.

 

[wokesmoke]

Apparently slandering me is ok @culturedbogan. Why aren’t those posts being deleted?

You will slander just about anyone else.

Who have I slandered?

 

[Tiger5150]

What the hell is it with guys attacking the girl to absolve JR? SMH.

To me this looks like a set-up and she is doing everything wrong. I don't understand anyone (male or female) sticking up for her.

Just say it's her house. Why doesn't she leave ? Why create a situation and record it ?

And conversely, I cant understand anyone sticking up for him. You're saying how terrible it is she recorded him, but if he wasn't such a piece of crap there'd be nothing to film.

This is where I think you get it wrong and I think modern society has it wrong. We are playing the side of women are such precious little perfect creatures when they aren't. They can be abusive and it's abusive to record a conversation on the sly like that.

If that is Josh at his worst then he is alright by me. He definitely isn't a criminal and having that uploaded like that into the public domain is sickening.

She was the abusive one? Wow. Ok you have nailed your colours.

She is definitely being abusive. She is deliberating recording conversations like that and uploading them onto the public domain.

If she knew he is like that why is she staying ? Why did she take that video ? What is in it for her ?

I'm not condoning his behavior. It's wrong. The thing is we are human beings and we aren't perfect and instances like these shouldn't be on the public domain or in our courts.

Righto mate, we know where you stand.

 

[Tiger5150]

did josh make the video did Josh post it
geez guys cut him some slack

Is Josh the one abusing the girl?