Magpie_Magic
Well-known member
They certainly didn't want to give us to many looks at it.
We were right on top then.
They probably thought we got too much of an even break last week.
And correctly challenged 3 yes 3 decisions.
Is that a record?
OFFICIAL Kelma Tuilagi
- Thread starter Geo
- Start date
We were right on top then.
They probably thought we got too much of an even break last week.
And correctly challenged 3 yes 3 decisions.
Is that a record?
YOU MISSED IT!!!
Please take time to learn the rules in regards to bounced balls and buy some specatcles before making such ignorant observations in future!!
Fingernail - what bullshit!!
He had the ball grasped in BOTH hands when it touched the ground!!
Why double down on stupid???
Is this your TV??
C
Cobarcats
Guest
The bunker overuled that didn't he~she, that was a try.
The ref awarded it didn't he?
You cant tell me that with limited angles that there was significant proof of separation, it was inconclusive, so try!
I still believe they have to get rid of slow mo's.
If a penalty was awarded maybe it should have been a P.Try?
I think we need to wear sensor gloves and footballs with pressure pads so if there is hand/ball separation a red light comes on, a bit bit like snicko and hotspot technology. 🤪
Maybe we need 3 separate independent bunkers in different states and countries viewing same footage. People in different time zones, different ethnic groups, mixed genders, different religion denominations, a rep from each political party, military strategists, supporters from every club, TAB rep, players involved sit lie detectors, and finally 3 coins, heads try, tails no try and mixed inconclusive. Shouldn't take as much time as they do now to stuff it up. 🤣🤣🤣
Tigers_Wests
Well-known member
The way the bunker currently rules on groundings, it was a try for the majority of teams. They always use slow-mo and look for separation. There was none in slow-mo, therefore a try.
We got burned by a fingertip of Burgess in that match against Souths last year (and technically the on field ref ruled Burgess a knock on in that one too!)
It really does depend on the colour of your jersey!
We got burned by a fingertip of Burgess in that match against Souths last year (and technically the on field ref ruled Burgess a knock on in that one too!)
It really does depend on the colour of your jersey!
Definitely grounded.
And if it wasn't = penalty try.
Massive mistake by the ref's and co.
And if it wasn't = penalty try.
Massive mistake by the ref's and co.
100% - It really is that simple.
twentyforty
Well-known member
Gosh Ashley Klein seems to make a lot of blunders.
He penalised Rochow for not standing square while ptb and handed Broncos an easy penalty in front to give them that win in 2018.
He made the call last week on the Tupou tackle.
How many times has this guy been suspended?
How many times will the nrl apologise for Klein’s mistakes?
He penalised Rochow for not standing square while ptb and handed Broncos an easy penalty in front to give them that win in 2018.
He made the call last week on the Tupou tackle.
How many times has this guy been suspended?
How many times will the nrl apologise for Klein’s mistakes?
It was a no try acccording to the Annusley script book in the bunker,section 1A clearly states "If there is any possible reason to rule against the WT do it,if not make one up".Klein does not want to lose his spot on the NRL gravy train so he had no choice in the matter.
Big Bwana Annusley will probably say that the bunker was correct and that will be the end of it.Having Annusley in charge is like having Attilla the Hun in charge of cultural development.
twentyforty
Well-known member
If that’s the case, I hope his team gets the spoon.
liltiger
Well-known member
It should have been a penalty try
bathursttiger1
Well-known member
Not the ref the Bunker.
TigerJunior4
Well-known member
There’s been a plethora of tries awarded over the years due to no separation so if the bunker was being consistent then it should have been awarded. Even if he was deemed to be tackled in the air and just dropped the ball it should have been a penalty try.
The bunker has screwed us over continually this season and cost us at least two games. It’s equal parts farcical and disgusting. The NRL won’t do anything about it though because they’re useless.
The bunker has screwed us over continually this season and cost us at least two games. It’s equal parts farcical and disgusting. The NRL won’t do anything about it though because they’re useless.
Tiger-ferret
Well-known member
I swore he grounded it even taking my tigers goggles off where my mate (doggies supporter) I was watching with said no way they got it right.
A weird one. Decision where both sides are confident with their opinions. Different game if it was awarded.
A weird one. Decision where both sides are confident with their opinions. Different game if it was awarded.
Magpie_Magic
Well-known member
Can't ever remember 3 challenges correctly overruled. Along with this no try shows we are too easily passed over.
Time for a meeting with Anneslly.
Time for a meeting with Anneslly.
The other possibilities are even worse to contemplate,a more than slight tinge of bias or corruption
Magpie_Magic
Well-known member
Conspiracy has always been real in RL.
The rorts and injustices to the Magpies 70s and 80s were unbelievable and mostly in the 80s not televised.
I thought when Fox controlled things between 2000 and 2009 things were less biased than ever.
But now where back to the rorts.
Can anyone imagine Easts or Melbourne overturning 3 challenges and what the post match interviews would be about.
NRL360 would be talking about how the system has to change all week.
It can be said we have been dudded 3 games this year.
Staff online
-
DempsModerator