dazza65
Well-known member
50/50 at best after multiple views- not clear either way imo so advantage to attacker and called a try so should have been given
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Mate… it has to be conclusive to overturn a decision. Ref didn’t even seem to instruct them on the second inspection - has to be a TRY !50/50 at best after multiple views- not clear either way imo so advantage to attacker and called a try so should have been given
and more than likely give it 2 them any way without conclusive evidence.when things change the comp will even outLike I said if that was Easts they would have looked at every angle seventeen times to be sure he got a finger to it.
I’m not paying/watching until such timeand more than likely give it 2 them any way without conclusive evidence.when things change the comp will even out
lets hope hell doesnt need 2 freeze over and we can all enjoy a fair contest soonI’m not paying/watching until such time
Whenever that will be...and more than likely give it 2 them any way without conclusive evidence.when things change the comp will even out
Should of just took the tap and set up for one of our superstar backs to score a try… oh wait 🤪I’m not sure what you guys are saying
No downward pressure?
He bounced it.
For him to bounce it, the ball would have to hit the turf. Otherwise he has dropped it.
When has downward pressure ever been a thing?
It only has to graze a blade of grass for it to be a try.
I’m outraged this has just been blown off so lightly.
Every other team would get 1000 looks to see if he had dropped it or maintained control.
I listened live but just watched the bunker replay. They pretty much claim he dropped it on the first view and then spend the next 4mins trying to determine how much of an impact Lomaxs contact is.
Fair dinkim get your priority’s right.
Get your pitchforks ready and start the March to HQ for Ansley’s performance review.
If it was Souffs it would have been an 8-point try and Lomax would have been sent offLike I said if that was Easts they would have looked at every angle seventeen times to be sure he got a finger to it.
Same hopeless ref as well.If that was a no try then the Burgass golden point try against us last year should have been a no try aswell
Still pissed with how quickly they dismissed it...especially after the warriors debacle earlier in the year
And it’s the only way they’ll stop the bias and general incompetence against usI hope the club is giving Annesley a tough time.
Legitimately getting screwed out of wins.
I'm not a conspiracy theorist so I put it down to human bias and gross incompetence.
Still pissed with how quickly they dismissed it...especially after the warriors debacle earlier in the year
I honestly don’t think you could tell with the available angles (to us viewers anyway). Unless the bunker saw some sort of alternate angle which confirmed it. Because it went up to them as a try.. So would need to be proven otherwise. It was seemingly dismissed too quickly, and I can’t say they made the right decision because of all the camera angles we saw, none actually confirmed that he didn’t ground itI am as one eyed as anyone on here, but I thought he dropped the ball
That's the point I don't remember close try situation (sent up as try) with so few camera angles and few replays and no very slow motion .So I can't tellI honestly don’t think you could tell with the available angles (to us viewers anyway). Unless the bunker saw some sort of alternate angle which confirmed it. Because it went up to them as a try.. So would need to be proven otherwise. It was seemingly dismissed too quickly, and I can’t say they made the right decision because of all the camera angles we saw, none actually confirmed that he didn’t ground it