OFFICIAL Kelma Tuilagi

50/50 at best after multiple views- not clear either way imo so advantage to attacker and called a try so should have been given
 
How many times do you hear given the inconclusive evidence we support the on-field decision..

Not the Klown Klien tho..blag bla blaaaaaah
 
I’m not sure what you guys are saying
No downward pressure?
He bounced it.
For him to bounce it, the ball would have to hit the turf. Otherwise he has dropped it.
When has downward pressure ever been a thing?
It only has to graze a blade of grass for it to be a try.
I’m outraged this has just been blown off so lightly.
Every other team would get 1000 looks to see if he had dropped it or maintained control.
I listened live but just watched the bunker replay. They pretty much claim he dropped it on the first view and then spend the next 4mins trying to determine how much of an impact Lomaxs contact is.
Fair dinkim get your priority’s right.
Get your pitchforks ready and start the March to HQ for Ansley’s performance review.
Should of just took the tap and set up for one of our superstar backs to score a try… oh wait 🤪
 
If that was a no try then the Burgass golden point try against us last year should have been a no try aswell

Still pissed with how quickly they dismissed it...especially after the warriors debacle earlier in the year
 
Still pissed with how quickly they dismissed it...especially after the warriors debacle earlier in the year

I said this is another thread and one poster said that my understanding was incorrect. It was stated that bunker looks at different views or something.

Personally I can see his hand on the ball and the ball on the ground. That is a try.

I can't believe it wasn't mentioned. Luc's try was a try as well. In both situations it appears they just don't even check.
 
I am as one eyed as anyone on here, but I thought he dropped the ball
I honestly don’t think you could tell with the available angles (to us viewers anyway). Unless the bunker saw some sort of alternate angle which confirmed it. Because it went up to them as a try.. So would need to be proven otherwise. It was seemingly dismissed too quickly, and I can’t say they made the right decision because of all the camera angles we saw, none actually confirmed that he didn’t ground it
 
I honestly don’t think you could tell with the available angles (to us viewers anyway). Unless the bunker saw some sort of alternate angle which confirmed it. Because it went up to them as a try.. So would need to be proven otherwise. It was seemingly dismissed too quickly, and I can’t say they made the right decision because of all the camera angles we saw, none actually confirmed that he didn’t ground it
That's the point I don't remember close try situation (sent up as try) with so few camera angles and few replays and no very slow motion .So I can't tell
Why?
 
Back
Top