Kyle Stanley

[GNR4LIFE]

Dane Nielsen is apparently looking for a new club. He'd be a better option than Stanley.

 

[innsaneink]

yes difinitely better

 

[pHyR3]

**When most sides have 80% of their cap tied up in 4 or 5** players you have to "toss the coin" on a number of fringe players. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose.

Toss the coin on Stanley, you just never know.

_Posted using RoarFEED 4.1.4_

really? most teams have 4-5 players on well over a million dollars a year?

for example, we have farah on 900k, but 700k on the cap due to veteran player allowance.

 

[851]

yes difinitely better

Whilst he ain't no world beater, the warriors would be footing some of his contract.

 

[Chipofftheoldblock]

Dane Nielsen is apparently looking for a new club. He'd be a better option than Stanley.

Now he would be a good purchase.

 

[GNR4LIFE]

Dane Nielsen is apparently looking for a new club. He'd be a better option than Stanley.

Now he would be a good purchase.

Yeah, i'd definitely take him.

 

[dazza65]

Absolutely Nielson >> Stanley

_Posted using RoarFEED 4.1.4_

 

[Gray]

No thanks. Both well below par players. Nielson was horrible for the warriors and was dropped for a lot of the season even.

_Posted using RoarFEED 4.1.4_

 

[GNR4LIFE]

No thanks. Both well below par players. Nielson was horrible for the warriors and was dropped for a lot of the season even.

_Posted using RoarFEED 4.1.4_

Both are about the best caliber of player we can attract atm

 

[Tony33]

No thanks. Both well below par players. Nielson was horrible for the warriors and was dropped for a lot of the season even.

_Posted using RoarFEED 4.1.4_

I agree Gray. Neilsen was their equivalent of Lawernce for us this year. It would be like any other club saying, Lawerence wouldn't a bad signing for the right price. I know there isn't much out there to sign but I'd rather save the money and take a gamble on Seve rather then sign a player of Neilsen's quality.

_Posted using RoarFEED 4.1.4_

 

[steve-o]

id take neilson for sure. no thanks to stanley