Report this postReply with quoteRe: Flanagan or Fulton
by ron burgandy » Sun 06 Jun, 2010 6:01 pm
>
bbobb wrote:
Fulton versus Flanagan - choice is easy. Fulton
>
1) Can make 40+ tackles in a game
2) Is the best-on-one tackler in the side
3) Has proven utility value
4) Is a much better ball player then Flanagan
5) Can run a good angle and hit a hole.
>
Don't get me wrong - I think Flanagan goes well however in my opinion he tries to play a brand of bash and barge football which isn't suited to his frame and while I don't mean to be overly critical of one incident, I doubt Fulton would have missed Luke Lewis in the Penrith game.
>
Fulton is essential as his ruck defence is excellent and will be relied upon in semi-final type football
>
actually statistically flanagan is outpointing fulton, and just for the record, how many games of super league did you watch flanagan play? He was a 5/8th over there so he would have to have ball playing skills
In what areas is he "statistically" outponting Fulton. I did not see Mark's superleague career (and given he played about 5 games, you would have to be very lucky to see it). I was referring to what we have witnssed in NRL - which BTW is more extensive than his SL career.
\
\
I am not bagging Flannagan - he has a real dig. Merely stating that in a two horse race, Fulton would be the clear choice
by ron burgandy » Sun 06 Jun, 2010 6:01 pm
>
bbobb wrote:
Fulton versus Flanagan - choice is easy. Fulton
>
1) Can make 40+ tackles in a game
2) Is the best-on-one tackler in the side
3) Has proven utility value
4) Is a much better ball player then Flanagan
5) Can run a good angle and hit a hole.
>
Don't get me wrong - I think Flanagan goes well however in my opinion he tries to play a brand of bash and barge football which isn't suited to his frame and while I don't mean to be overly critical of one incident, I doubt Fulton would have missed Luke Lewis in the Penrith game.
>
Fulton is essential as his ruck defence is excellent and will be relied upon in semi-final type football
>
actually statistically flanagan is outpointing fulton, and just for the record, how many games of super league did you watch flanagan play? He was a 5/8th over there so he would have to have ball playing skills
In what areas is he "statistically" outponting Fulton. I did not see Mark's superleague career (and given he played about 5 games, you would have to be very lucky to see it). I was referring to what we have witnssed in NRL - which BTW is more extensive than his SL career.
\
\
I am not bagging Flannagan - he has a real dig. Merely stating that in a two horse race, Fulton would be the clear choice