tony soprano
Well-known member
We obviously need a big talker and leader in the 7 in this team. Hastings type player.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@tyga said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1357268) said:@strongee said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1357220) said:@tyga said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1356941) said:Feel for Brooksy. His time is up at the Tigers the club and player would be better off severing ties. Too many years of battling has drained his confidence. He can be a good NRL player at another club he has the talent just doesn’t look like he’s thinking at all about his footy.
People say this , and it’s probably true , but I think what they’re really saying , is “im off him and I’m sick of watching him lose , so I want anyone else “ . Just my opinion , if it’s the Jock Madden era soon I’m all for it , but I will always think we messed up a good un, in brooks .
For me it’s clear he’s cooked at the Tigers. Douihei is basically a rookie half and a way better player. We are not winning anything for years. Better off trying youth and giving them a chance. We are losing anyway squad is not up to standard.
Brooks to the Raiders or Rabbits would be the best move if they move on from their halfbacks. We would have to cover 300 or so but it’s the smart play for all parties.
@geo said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1357251) said:Defensively about the only one who did his job tonight
@2005magic said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1357293) said:Ive said my piece on Brooks before but my only observation is and I want people to be honest in their hearts in responding to this. Would Roosters / Storm / Raiders, or most any other club, have persisted with Brooks 'ón potential' for this long? Look how ruthless they are with team selections, recruitment and dismissal.
Where are they and where are we?
@2005magic said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1357293) said:Ive said my piece on Brooks before but my only observation is and I want people to be honest in their hearts in responding to this. Would Roosters / Storm / Raiders, or most any other club, have persisted with Brooks 'ón potential' for this long? Look how ruthless they are with team selections, recruitment and dismissal.
Where are they and where are we?
@bagnf05 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1357378) said:@2005magic said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1357293) said:Ive said my piece on Brooks before but my only observation is and I want people to be honest in their hearts in responding to this. Would Roosters / Storm / Raiders, or most any other club, have persisted with Brooks 'ón potential' for this long? Look how ruthless they are with team selections, recruitment and dismissal.
Where are they and where are we?
Difference is we’re expecting brooks to carry around a bunch or outcasts, rejects and want to be’s. Those clubs just ask a half to come in and get the basics right.
@tigerap said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1357307) said:Brooks game management has been poor this year...he cannot put a decent grubber into the in goal.... his cross field kicks are mostly ineffectual....both the club and he needs a change of scenery
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1357382) said:@bagnf05 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1357378) said:@2005magic said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1357293) said:Ive said my piece on Brooks before but my only observation is and I want people to be honest in their hearts in responding to this. Would Roosters / Storm / Raiders, or most any other club, have persisted with Brooks 'ón potential' for this long? Look how ruthless they are with team selections, recruitment and dismissal.
Where are they and where are we?
Difference is we’re expecting brooks to carry around a bunch or outcasts, rejects and want to be’s. Those clubs just ask a half to come in and get the basics right.
Or maybe we can’t attract decent players because they know Brooks will be the half !
Even Geo said it would be better for both parties to part ways .
@camel2281 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1357360) said:@geo said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1357251) said:Defensively about the only one who did his job tonight
And was the teams worst with Cini in attack
@2005magic said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1357293) said:Ive said my piece on Brooks before but my only observation is and I want people to be honest in their hearts in responding to this. Would Roosters / Storm / Raiders, or most any other club, have persisted with Brooks 'ón potential' for this long? Look how ruthless they are with team selections, recruitment and dismissal.
Where are they and where are we?
@2005magic said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1357293) said:Ive said my piece on Brooks before but my only observation is and I want people to be honest in their hearts in responding to this. Would Roosters / Storm / Raiders, or most any other club, have persisted with Brooks 'ón potential' for this long? Look how ruthless they are with team selections, recruitment and dismissal.
Where are they and where are we?
@jc99 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1357434) said:Needs a few weeks in reserves. He is playing average, predictable football. Madden deserves a chance too based off his form.
@bagnf05 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1357285) said:@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1357262) said:@bagnf05 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1357249) said:@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1357246) said:@bagnf05 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1357198) said:@weststigerman said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1357184) said:He's got zero confidence and is a liability out there.
Madden is probably not the answer right now, but he's got potential to one day be it. No point watching Brooks make the same mistakes over and over again.
I hope he picks madden so when we concede over 30 and lose and you all have no scapegoat
And if Madden slays it ?
Will you concede ?
My very argument is that the halfback is far from our worst problem. So Madden slaying it will likely still result in countless tries down our edges and a disappointing loss. So no net change.
But if we’re winning it doesn’t matter
I don’t think this team will win many more games this year. Nathan Cleary in the 7 wouldn’t make much difference
@cktiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1357441) said:@bagnf05 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1357285) said:@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1357262) said:@bagnf05 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1357249) said:@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1357246) said:@bagnf05 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1357198) said:@weststigerman said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1357184) said:He's got zero confidence and is a liability out there.
Madden is probably not the answer right now, but he's got potential to one day be it. No point watching Brooks make the same mistakes over and over again.
I hope he picks madden so when we concede over 30 and lose and you all have no scapegoat
And if Madden slays it ?
Will you concede ?
My very argument is that the halfback is far from our worst problem. So Madden slaying it will likely still result in countless tries down our edges and a disappointing loss. So no net change.
But if we’re winning it doesn’t matter
I don’t think this team will win many more games this year. Nathan Cleary in the 7 wouldn’t make much difference
Yes he would.
@izotope said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1357438) said:@jc99 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1357434) said:Needs a few weeks in reserves. He is playing average, predictable football. Madden deserves a chance too based off his form.
Or a few months, really just no way he can continue as our 7. Douehi is what 6 games in to 5/8 and running rings around him already. At this stage we may as well just play a prop for 7.