Here’s the thing with the Brooks debate . Anybody defending him has used stats , football knowledge , dissection of plays . Even offered tactical reasoning to explain why certain things have or haven’t happened in the game . And most , including me , have said that if a better solution presents itself , we should look to move him on for his sake as much as the tigers .
The brooks haters have “we haven’t made the finals in 10 years” . Neglecting the fact that for 6 of those years not the last 4 , I’ll give you that , but the first 6 , the team was built around other players . And in actuality , this is the first year , maybe last year at a pinch , that the team was actually built around brooks . So we have educated reasoning , backed up by evidence , on one side , and straight quackery and emotional hyperbole on the other .
This tone reminding anyone of any other debates going on at the moment . …