Luke Brooks

Status
Not open for further replies.
@merlot said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1453458) said:
@tony-soprano said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1453453) said:
@the_patriot said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1453436) said:
@cochise said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1453431) said:
@the_patriot said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1453429) said:
@cochise said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1453421) said:
Enough of the personal stuff, anything further will be deleted.

Sorry Cochise but I've done very little wrong here.

Have the balls to call out the troublemaker.

Too be honest, I don't know who started it or who said what and I am not going back and reading through that tripe to find out. It stops now.

Ok thanks.

That's me done for this year.

That's a pathetic response and I'm not going to just accept it.

Don't let it get to you just use the block function

bring in a hug button

?
 
Brooks is fine. Someone suggest an alternative and I'll listen. I'd take Brooks over Moses, too.

You all are way over top reactionary. yeah, yeah...no finals, can't manage a game, but he's a good player, and probably best defensive halfback behind Cleary. You all realise how many EXTRA tries we'd leak with just about any other half in the game?

Also, I think he plays with heart and is getting better. Is he up there with Cleary, Hughes, Keary, DCE? No, but even DCE looks bog average when team around him is not going well.

Again, if we have a better alternative lets go for it, and lets go for a number of up and coming halves, but we've got nothing better out there so you all need to get off Brooks' back.

The extent of criticism of Brooks with absolutely no alternative offered is ridiculous.
 
@watersider said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1453465) said:
Brooks is fine. Someone suggest an alternative and I'll listen. I'd take Brooks over Moses, too.

You all are way over top reactionary. yeah, yeah...no finals, can't manage a game, but he's a good player, and probably best defensive halfback behind Cleary. You all realise how many EXTRA tries we'd leak with just about any other half in the game?

Also, I think he plays with heart and is getting better. Is he up there with Cleary, Hughes, Keary, DCE? No, but even DCE looks bog average when team around him is not going well.

Again, if we have a better alternative lets go for it, and lets go for a number of up and coming halves, but we've got nothing better out there so you all need to get off Brooks' back.

The extent of criticism of Brooks with absolutely no alternative offered is ridiculous.

Mate anyone is an alternative , literally anyone. You cannot have your halfback have absolutely zero traits of what it takes to be a halfback. It’s like saying a forward should be kept in the team because he can catch a bomb. He gives us zero game management , he gives us zero field position. He has no voice. Enough is enough.
 
@tigerpower said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1453475) said:
@watersider said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1453465) said:
Brooks is fine. Someone suggest an alternative and I'll listen. I'd take Brooks over Moses, too.

You all are way over top reactionary. yeah, yeah...no finals, can't manage a game, but he's a good player, and probably best defensive halfback behind Cleary. You all realise how many EXTRA tries we'd leak with just about any other half in the game?

Also, I think he plays with heart and is getting better. Is he up there with Cleary, Hughes, Keary, DCE? No, but even DCE looks bog average when team around him is not going well.

Again, if we have a better alternative lets go for it, and lets go for a number of up and coming halves, but we've got nothing better out there so you all need to get off Brooks' back.

The extent of criticism of Brooks with absolutely no alternative offered is ridiculous.

Mate anyone is an alternative , literally anyone. You cannot have your halfback have absolutely zero traits of what it takes to be a halfback. It’s like saying a forward should be kept in the team because he can catch a bomb. He gives us zero game management , he gives us zero field position. He has no voice. Enough is enough.

Ok, I’m gonna throw out a name. Billy Walters.
 
@gnr4life said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1453481) said:
@tigerpower said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1453475) said:
@watersider said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1453465) said:
Brooks is fine. Someone suggest an alternative and I'll listen. I'd take Brooks over Moses, too.

You all are way over top reactionary. yeah, yeah...no finals, can't manage a game, but he's a good player, and probably best defensive halfback behind Cleary. You all realise how many EXTRA tries we'd leak with just about any other half in the game?

Also, I think he plays with heart and is getting better. Is he up there with Cleary, Hughes, Keary, DCE? No, but even DCE looks bog average when team around him is not going well.

Again, if we have a better alternative lets go for it, and lets go for a number of up and coming halves, but we've got nothing better out there so you all need to get off Brooks' back.

The extent of criticism of Brooks with absolutely no alternative offered is ridiculous.

Mate anyone is an alternative , literally anyone. You cannot have your halfback have absolutely zero traits of what it takes to be a halfback. It’s like saying a forward should be kept in the team because he can catch a bomb. He gives us zero game management , he gives us zero field position. He has no voice. Enough is enough.

Ok, I’m gonna throw out a name. Billy Walters.

He won't be here next year.
 
@tigerpower said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1453475) said:
@watersider said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1453465) said:
Brooks is fine. Someone suggest an alternative and I'll listen. I'd take Brooks over Moses, too.

You all are way over top reactionary. yeah, yeah...no finals, can't manage a game, but he's a good player, and probably best defensive halfback behind Cleary. You all realise how many EXTRA tries we'd leak with just about any other half in the game?

Also, I think he plays with heart and is getting better. Is he up there with Cleary, Hughes, Keary, DCE? No, but even DCE looks bog average when team around him is not going well.

Again, if we have a better alternative lets go for it, and lets go for a number of up and coming halves, but we've got nothing better out there so you all need to get off Brooks' back.

The extent of criticism of Brooks with absolutely no alternative offered is ridiculous.

Mate anyone is an alternative , literally anyone. You cannot have your halfback have absolutely zero traits of what it takes to be a halfback. It’s like saying a forward should be kept in the team because he can catch a bomb. He gives us zero game management , he gives us zero field position. He has no voice. Enough is enough.

yeah, no worries. When you see 'anyone' running out there in our dumb team you'll be wishing we had Brooks back. Again, not the best halfback in the league but who is your alternative? Ash Taylor's available. You prefer him? Maybe we could nab Jr Flanagan? Harris-Tavita? Mitchell Pearce? None are better imo.

Remember how everyone couldn't wait to get rid of Benji so that our defense would improve and he was stifling our attack? Not saying I don't understand getting rid of Benji but neither our attack or defense has improved without him.
 
@gnr4life said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1453481) said:
@tigerpower said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1453475) said:
@watersider said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1453465) said:
Brooks is fine. Someone suggest an alternative and I'll listen. I'd take Brooks over Moses, too.

You all are way over top reactionary. yeah, yeah...no finals, can't manage a game, but he's a good player, and probably best defensive halfback behind Cleary. You all realise how many EXTRA tries we'd leak with just about any other half in the game?

Also, I think he plays with heart and is getting better. Is he up there with Cleary, Hughes, Keary, DCE? No, but even DCE looks bog average when team around him is not going well.

Again, if we have a better alternative lets go for it, and lets go for a number of up and coming halves, but we've got nothing better out there so you all need to get off Brooks' back.

The extent of criticism of Brooks with absolutely no alternative offered is ridiculous.

Mate anyone is an alternative , literally anyone. You cannot have your halfback have absolutely zero traits of what it takes to be a halfback. It’s like saying a forward should be kept in the team because he can catch a bomb. He gives us zero game management , he gives us zero field position. He has no voice. Enough is enough.

Ok, I’m gonna throw out a name. Billy Walters.

Except Billy Walters lol. Jokes aside how do we know? Look at gamble he looked rubbish in his couple of games here. He looked pretty good this year. How will we ever know. What I do know is that 160 games later and brooks doesn’t have it.
 
@watersider said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1453465) said:
Brooks is fine. Someone suggest an alternative and I'll listen. I'd take Brooks over Moses, too.

You all are way over top reactionary. yeah, yeah...no finals, can't manage a game, but he's a good player, and probably best defensive halfback behind Cleary. You all realise how many EXTRA tries we'd leak with just about any other half in the game?

Also, I think he plays with heart and is getting better. Is he up there with Cleary, Hughes, Keary, DCE? No, but even DCE looks bog average when team around him is not going well.

Again, if we have a better alternative lets go for it, and lets go for a number of up and coming halves, but we've got nothing better out there so you all need to get off Brooks' back.

The extent of criticism of Brooks with absolutely no alternative offered is ridiculous.

Aiden Sezar.
He'd be great.
Ahumdililah.
 
@watersider said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1453485) said:
@tigerpower said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1453475) said:
@watersider said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1453465) said:
Brooks is fine. Someone suggest an alternative and I'll listen. I'd take Brooks over Moses, too.

You all are way over top reactionary. yeah, yeah...no finals, can't manage a game, but he's a good player, and probably best defensive halfback behind Cleary. You all realise how many EXTRA tries we'd leak with just about any other half in the game?

Also, I think he plays with heart and is getting better. Is he up there with Cleary, Hughes, Keary, DCE? No, but even DCE looks bog average when team around him is not going well.

Again, if we have a better alternative lets go for it, and lets go for a number of up and coming halves, but we've got nothing better out there so you all need to get off Brooks' back.

The extent of criticism of Brooks with absolutely no alternative offered is ridiculous.

Mate anyone is an alternative , literally anyone. You cannot have your halfback have absolutely zero traits of what it takes to be a halfback. It’s like saying a forward should be kept in the team because he can catch a bomb. He gives us zero game management , he gives us zero field position. He has no voice. Enough is enough.

yeah, no worries. When you see 'anyone' running out there in our dumb team you'll be wishing we had Brooks back. Again, not the best halfback in the league but who is your alternative? Ash Taylor's available. You prefer him? Maybe we could nab Jr Flanagan? Harris-Tavita? Mitchell Pearce? None are better imo.

Remember how everyone couldn't wait to get rid of Benji so that our defense would improve and he was stifling our attack? Not saying I don't understand getting rid of Benji but neither our attack or defense has improved without him.

Ash Taylor yes
Harris Tavita yes
Jamal Fogerty yes
Toby Sexton yes
 
@demps said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1453488) said:
@watersider said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1453465) said:
Brooks is fine. Someone suggest an alternative and I'll listen. I'd take Brooks over Moses, too.

You all are way over top reactionary. yeah, yeah...no finals, can't manage a game, but he's a good player, and probably best defensive halfback behind Cleary. You all realise how many EXTRA tries we'd leak with just about any other half in the game?

Also, I think he plays with heart and is getting better. Is he up there with Cleary, Hughes, Keary, DCE? No, but even DCE looks bog average when team around him is not going well.

Again, if we have a better alternative lets go for it, and lets go for a number of up and coming halves, but we've got nothing better out there so you all need to get off Brooks' back.

The extent of criticism of Brooks with absolutely no alternative offered is ridiculous.

Aiden Sezar.
He'd be great.
Ahumdililah.

But he’s a Turk ?
Lebs only ?
 
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1453491) said:
@demps said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1453488) said:
@watersider said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1453465) said:
Brooks is fine. Someone suggest an alternative and I'll listen. I'd take Brooks over Moses, too.

You all are way over top reactionary. yeah, yeah...no finals, can't manage a game, but he's a good player, and probably best defensive halfback behind Cleary. You all realise how many EXTRA tries we'd leak with just about any other half in the game?

Also, I think he plays with heart and is getting better. Is he up there with Cleary, Hughes, Keary, DCE? No, but even DCE looks bog average when team around him is not going well.

Again, if we have a better alternative lets go for it, and lets go for a number of up and coming halves, but we've got nothing better out there so you all need to get off Brooks' back.

The extent of criticism of Brooks with absolutely no alternative offered is ridiculous.

Aiden Sezar.
He'd be great.
Ahumdililah.

But he’s a Turk ?
Lebs only ?

Big fan of Sezar.
He'd be great for us.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top