OFFICIAL Luke Garner [Discussion]

@Spud_Murphy said in [Garner suspended](/post/1047580) said:
Anyone still think the NRL is a fair competition? The disparities in refereeing, judiciary sentences and decisions made by head office over the course of this season have just been so damn blatant, irrational, outrageous and arrogant! Makes me want to puke.

You can drop someone on their head and get away with it if your names Jake Trbojevic
 
Look it does not surprise he got suspended.
Unfortunate but it hasn’t been until this week that the NRL, well Annesley have come out and mentioned the crackdown, pushed all the way from the commission.
We were just stupid enough not to get the message from the most recent suspensions of Sims and Kikau. Fairs fair in this case.
No late hits.
Exact same thing happened last year when taking out a kicking half was outlawed.
We just need to be smarter.
Next time, just don’t make a tackle give them a hug instead, every other tackler seems to be able to do it on a half.
 
Not shocked, not surprised.

Waste of time trying to fight it.

he plays for the wrong type of club.

You cant beat this type of corruption.
 
@innsaneink said in [Garner suspended](/post/1047549) said:
Smh 😢
1,week
Does anyone know. What's happening here?

He doesn't play for the Rooster Souths Broncos or the Storm.
 
This is all well and good if they book all the other blokes for a week for every remaining match this year.

Fair enough Kikau had the book thrown at him for a similarly inoffensive incident, so if this is the precedent they want to set, I want to see them all go.

Chris Smith should have got half a week's suspension because his was half as bad as Garners, something like 20 ms reaction time rather than 40 ms.

God forbid the bloke who follows through with 80 ms reaction time!!!
 
@851 said in [Garner suspended](/post/1047568) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Garner suspended](/post/1047567) said:
@willow said in [Garner suspended](/post/1047563) said:
Wow...I'm still stunned he was even charged but suspended...what planet are these people from???

Does this mean the NRL have drawn a line in the sand in regards to late hits ?

Only if your wearing a Tigers jersey ?


Smith copped the same charge, didn’t bother fighting it

Because he didn't have any carry over points and was free to play this round either way.
 
As much as I don't like Gus Gould, he said the other day that all these decisions ( MRC, Judiciary, Referees) are controlled by the knobs of the NRL.
I looks like he is right, just another way to try and squeeze us out of the NRL.
 
The reason Garner was suspended is he had carry over points so taking an early plea still cost him a game..

The joke is the carry over point weren't for the same offence it was a high tackle from last season not dangerous contact..

The whole system needs an overhaul..he wasn't suspended because he wears a Wests Tigers jersey ..he was suspended because the system is flawed..
 
@Geo said in [Garner suspended](/post/1047607) said:
The reason Garner was suspended is he had carry over points so taking an early plea still cost him a game..

The joke is the carry over point weren't for the same offence it was a high tackle from last season not dangerous contact..

The whole system needs an overhaul..he wasn't suspended because he wears a Wests Tigers jersey ..he was suspended because the system is flawed..


At an exponential rate I’m struggling to agree with this. There was a segment on fox tonight showing the favouritism towards the storm in how long a defender lies on the tackled player. Blatant favouritism. It’s just becoming ridiculous.
 
Well! The idiots at Nrl Hq have set an unrealistic standard/precedence of how the human body is supposed to stop mid-action within a matter of seconds, which is anatomically impossible to do unless your playing freeze frame..
 
@Tiger_Steve said in [Garner suspended](/post/1047611) said:
@Geo said in [Garner suspended](/post/1047607) said:
The reason Garner was suspended is he had carry over points so taking an early plea still cost him a game..

The joke is the carry over point weren't for the same offence it was a high tackle from last season not dangerous contact..

The whole system needs an overhaul..he wasn't suspended because he wears a Wests Tigers jersey ..he was suspended because the system is flawed..


At an exponential rate I’m struggling to agree with this. There was a segment on fox tonight showing the favouritism towards the storm in how long a defender lies on the tackled player. Blatant favouritism. It’s just becoming ridiculous.

What show please @Tiger_Steve?
 
@bathursttiger said in [Garner suspended](/post/1047606) said:
As much as I don't like Gus Gould, he said the other day that all these decisions ( MRC, Judiciary, Referees) are controlled by the knobs of the NRL.
I looks like he is right, just another way to try and squeeze us out of the NRL.


Same with me in regards to Gus “bull frog” Gould ..
But I’d love to see him oust Greenberg and his cronies from the NRL Penthouse

Gus does love Leichhardt on a Sunday afternoon!
 
@Tiger_Steve said in [Garner suspended](/post/1047611) said:
@Geo said in [Garner suspended](/post/1047607) said:
The reason Garner was suspended is he had carry over points so taking an early plea still cost him a game..

The joke is the carry over point weren't for the same offence it was a high tackle from last season not dangerous contact..

The whole system needs an overhaul..he wasn't suspended because he wears a Wests Tigers jersey ..he was suspended because the system is flawed..


At an exponential rate I’m struggling to agree with this. There was a segment on fox tonight showing the favouritism towards the storm in how long a defender lies on the tackled player. Blatant favouritism. It’s just becoming ridiculous.

Oh I agree there ...but that has nothing to do with the flawed judicial system..Any player who has carry over points faces suspension for a grade 1 charge taking the plea wont save them so you fight the charge
 
The NRL are the most disgraceful and unfair sporting organization on the planet

Garner plays for rorters or donkeys there wouldn't even of been a sinbinning or suspension

Todd Greenburg is a dud and should walk away from the job
 
@Geo said in [Garner suspended](/post/1047607) said:
The reason Garner was suspended is he had carry over points so taking an early plea still cost him a game..

The joke is the carry over point weren't for the same offence it was a high tackle from last season not dangerous contact..

The whole system needs an overhaul..he wasn't suspended because he wears a Wests Tigers jersey ..he was suspended because the system is flawed..


In that case why wasn’t he advised to plead guilty instead of not guilty if he had carryovers?...He probably would have got off...👎
 
@Geo said in [Garner suspended](/post/1047617) said:
@Tiger_Steve said in [Garner suspended](/post/1047611) said:
@Geo said in [Garner suspended](/post/1047607) said:
The reason Garner was suspended is he had carry over points so taking an early plea still cost him a game..

The joke is the carry over point weren't for the same offence it was a high tackle from last season not dangerous contact..

The whole system needs an overhaul..he wasn't suspended because he wears a Wests Tigers jersey ..he was suspended because the system is flawed..


At an exponential rate I’m struggling to agree with this. There was a segment on fox tonight showing the favouritism towards the storm in how long a defender lies on the tackled player. Blatant favouritism. It’s just becoming ridiculous.

Oh I agree there ...but that has nothing to do with the flawed judicial system..Any player who has carry over points faces suspension for a grade 1 charge taking the plea wont save them so you fight the charge

Was Lional Hutz Garners lawyer ?
Burgess seems to get off despite having a rap sheet longer than Adolf Hitler !
 
@Tigerlily said in [Garner suspended](/post/1047619) said:
@Geo said in [Garner suspended](/post/1047607) said:
The reason Garner was suspended is he had carry over points so taking an early plea still cost him a game..

The joke is the carry over point weren't for the same offence it was a high tackle from last season not dangerous contact..

The whole system needs an overhaul..he wasn't suspended because he wears a Wests Tigers jersey ..he was suspended because the system is flawed..


In that case why wasn’t he advised to plead guilty instead of not guilty if he had carryovers?...He probably would have got off...?

No if he pleads guilty the reduction plus his carry over points he still misses a game..thar's the point..

If he pleads not guilty and wins he's free to play..no carry over points from the current charge
 
Back
Top