@mccarry2 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1407377) said:@frullens said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1407361) said:@cochise said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1407219) said:I am seriously lost today, Madge isn't getting it done but I don't believe in making change unless there is a very clear plan on what happens after that to make things better. Otherwise you are likely to end up in the same place in 2 years time. There are only 2 coaches that I think can walk in with a high probability of solving this problem and they won't be coming to the Wests Tigers there are serious problems with every other option. I really don't know what we should do to get out of this and I am arrogant enough to believe that if I can't see the solution than no one else can. The most hopeless I have ever felt about the team.
I think its best to stick with Madge.
How does changing another coach help? Unless they are Robinson or Bellamy. Even they would need 3 or 4 years to get there systems in place.
As gould says, the clubs at the bottom are there because they look for quick fix and not develop their own talent.
We can't rely on signings, we need to build from within. The most popular thread on this forum is the signings thread - even us as fans keep.looking for the one saviour signings to fix everything- coach or player. It ain't going to happen.
If we are to turn this around it has to be a team effort. Can't all sit with madge. Players, coaching staff, executives, board, all need to be pulling in the right direction.
Get amdge more help in the coaching team.
Give the club time to let the juniors come through with stability in the coaching system.
And let's see what happens.
I've watched the last 10 years of changing coaches bc players aren't putting in - and it hasn't worked. So let's try something different.
Have some trust, faith and hope.
Almost word for word this has been my opinion for a few years.
My opinion is shifting though.
The Tigers are putting systems in around the club that are bigger than the coach. Front office is profitable. Infrastructure is improving. Recruitment has been patient and excellent at getting the cream of available young talent.
Our lower grades are strong. Soon we will have Sheens playing a role driving growth in players and stability in pathways.
At that point, when the coach isn’t the corner stone holding up the club… then if we are not getting results we can ask three questions that should be asked of all people leaders;
1. How frequently do team members perform near the top of their potential
2. Are team members growing in impact
3. Can the leader attract talented people to their team
If the answers are not where they need to be we should start benching for an alternative coach.
We would only trigger a change when the alternate people leader (coach) is likely to get better outcomes to the 3 questions above.
Absolutely agree!
I'd also add that all the change with recruitment and juniors, etc has come about since Madge has come on board.
I'm not inside the club but I would think he has been driving a lot of that change and trying to build the structures that are bigger than him.
But at the beginning, it was just him and so it takes a lot of effort to be doing a lot of jobs.
I still think there is more support that needs to be put in place in the coaching structure for the top 30, to take the pressure and responsibility off madge. And just let him be the 'manager
Once we do that, it's easier to remove the figurehead but remain stable.