@twentyforty said in [Maguire seeking stable combinations](/post/1279985) said:@Strongee said in [Maguire seeking stable combinations](/post/1279974) said:@twentyforty said in [Maguire seeking stable combinations](/post/1279972) said:@Strongee said in [Maguire seeking stable combinations](/post/1279966) said:@twentyforty said in [Maguire seeking stable combinations](/post/1279960) said:The combo I’m keen to see develop is Jet & BJ. When they’re on the same side, given clean early ball to BJ. We now have a forward pack to keep defence more compact an get a quick PTB.
They will never be on the same side .It’s not union mate
The really good coaches & players not only know the rules but also know when to break them.
Union? They need to modify that game to bring it into this century.
Sorry mate but What ? That’s not modifying the game mate !That’s returning it to 1980. The fullback and opposite side half , both setup down that side to create the extra man .
The edge back rower and centre run various combinations of lines , to confuse the defence , with the second receiver and fullback creating the width , and variation to create the extra man .
The reason you can’t do what your saying is , if you do , all your backs are on one side and if the play dies , you now have to take a settler and waste a tackle , whilst also allowing the defence to adjust to any advantage you’ve gained on the other side of the field.
Sorry mate, I’m not really interested in union, was forced to play it for a couple of seasons, but couldn’t be bothered .
I don't think Strongee was talking about union mate.