Elderslie_Tiger
Well-known member
Cronulla said the same thing about MORRIS had a meeting with him 24hrs later he was gone
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@gallagher said in [Maguire's job not on the line: Lee Hagipantelis](/post/1347338) said:@happy_tiger said in [Maguire's job not on the line: Lee Hagipantelis](/post/1347334) said:@gallagher said in [Maguire's job not on the line: Lee Hagipantelis](/post/1347331) said:@twentyforty said in [Maguire's job not on the line: Lee Hagipantelis](/post/1347317) said:@gallagher said in [Maguire's job not on the line: Lee Hagipantelis](/post/1347308) said:@twentyforty said in [Maguire's job not on the line: Lee Hagipantelis](/post/1347297) said:@gallagher said in [Maguire's job not on the line: Lee Hagipantelis](/post/1347238) said:@willow said in [Maguire's job not on the line: Lee Hagipantelis](/post/1347208) said:@jadtiger said in [Maguire's job not on the line: Lee Hagipantelis](/post/1347199) said:@newtown said in [Maguire's job not on the line: Lee Hagipantelis](/post/1347034) said:But we’re not getting the results that we all want. It’s the entire club’s responsibility, and we’re one-in, all-in.”
Somebody should tell that to the 2 mongrels on the board that are excellent at backstabbing and protecting their own interests.Undoubtedly the leaks are coming from at least 1 of them and unfortunately they are seemingly "untouchable" themselves.
That particular cancer still needs to be removed from the club and i dont care who they are
I have no doubt the board is part of the problem, but how do you solve that aspect? Private ownership might be the way to go, but no one would seriously consider buying this club at the moment.
You'd only need interested in the license. Buying the actual club would be cheapish atm.
WT is member owned just like other successful clubs, Panthers, Raiders, Roosters and a few others. While it may present an issue in some cases, ownership is not the real big’n if the organisational structure is sound. Clubs generally don’t publicly display their OC, which is odd? The Broncos are more transparent due to regulatory circumstances, but the others not so. They operate more like a church, with a different kind of religion. The successful clubs seem to have a kind of military precision aura about them.
We're not really member owned. You can't become a member then vote on anything.
If the club wasn’t a “not for profit” then the ATO would call them to account..hahaha
Lol, true.
Maybe that cousins be next year's cliche.
2022 Wests Tigers - Not for profit.
Prefer 2022 Wests Tigers : Up For Sale
Free to a good home.
@happy_tiger said in [Maguire's job not on the line: Lee Hagipantelis](/post/1347343) said:@gallagher said in [Maguire's job not on the line: Lee Hagipantelis](/post/1347338) said:@happy_tiger said in [Maguire's job not on the line: Lee Hagipantelis](/post/1347334) said:@gallagher said in [Maguire's job not on the line: Lee Hagipantelis](/post/1347331) said:@twentyforty said in [Maguire's job not on the line: Lee Hagipantelis](/post/1347317) said:@gallagher said in [Maguire's job not on the line: Lee Hagipantelis](/post/1347308) said:@twentyforty said in [Maguire's job not on the line: Lee Hagipantelis](/post/1347297) said:@gallagher said in [Maguire's job not on the line: Lee Hagipantelis](/post/1347238) said:@willow said in [Maguire's job not on the line: Lee Hagipantelis](/post/1347208) said:@jadtiger said in [Maguire's job not on the line: Lee Hagipantelis](/post/1347199) said:@newtown said in [Maguire's job not on the line: Lee Hagipantelis](/post/1347034) said:But we’re not getting the results that we all want. It’s the entire club’s responsibility, and we’re one-in, all-in.”
Somebody should tell that to the 2 mongrels on the board that are excellent at backstabbing and protecting their own interests.Undoubtedly the leaks are coming from at least 1 of them and unfortunately they are seemingly "untouchable" themselves.
That particular cancer still needs to be removed from the club and i dont care who they are
I have no doubt the board is part of the problem, but how do you solve that aspect? Private ownership might be the way to go, but no one would seriously consider buying this club at the moment.
You'd only need interested in the license. Buying the actual club would be cheapish atm.
WT is member owned just like other successful clubs, Panthers, Raiders, Roosters and a few others. While it may present an issue in some cases, ownership is not the real big’n if the organisational structure is sound. Clubs generally don’t publicly display their OC, which is odd? The Broncos are more transparent due to regulatory circumstances, but the others not so. They operate more like a church, with a different kind of religion. The successful clubs seem to have a kind of military precision aura about them.
We're not really member owned. You can't become a member then vote on anything.
If the club wasn’t a “not for profit” then the ATO would call them to account..hahaha
Lol, true.
Maybe that cousins be next year's cliche.
2022 Wests Tigers - Not for profit.
Prefer 2022 Wests Tigers : Up For Sale
Free to a good home.
Drop us off at the doors of RSPCA you reckon ??
@elderslie_tiger said in [Maguire's job not on the line: Lee Hagipantelis](/post/1347341) said:Cronulla said the same thing about MORRIS had a meeting with him 24hrs later he was gone
@gallagher said in [Maguire's job not on the line: Lee Hagipantelis](/post/1347353) said:@happy_tiger said in [Maguire's job not on the line: Lee Hagipantelis](/post/1347343) said:@gallagher said in [Maguire's job not on the line: Lee Hagipantelis](/post/1347338) said:@happy_tiger said in [Maguire's job not on the line: Lee Hagipantelis](/post/1347334) said:@gallagher said in [Maguire's job not on the line: Lee Hagipantelis](/post/1347331) said:@twentyforty said in [Maguire's job not on the line: Lee Hagipantelis](/post/1347317) said:@gallagher said in [Maguire's job not on the line: Lee Hagipantelis](/post/1347308) said:@twentyforty said in [Maguire's job not on the line: Lee Hagipantelis](/post/1347297) said:@gallagher said in [Maguire's job not on the line: Lee Hagipantelis](/post/1347238) said:@willow said in [Maguire's job not on the line: Lee Hagipantelis](/post/1347208) said:@jadtiger said in [Maguire's job not on the line: Lee Hagipantelis](/post/1347199) said:@newtown said in [Maguire's job not on the line: Lee Hagipantelis](/post/1347034) said:But we’re not getting the results that we all want. It’s the entire club’s responsibility, and we’re one-in, all-in.”
Somebody should tell that to the 2 mongrels on the board that are excellent at backstabbing and protecting their own interests.Undoubtedly the leaks are coming from at least 1 of them and unfortunately they are seemingly "untouchable" themselves.
That particular cancer still needs to be removed from the club and i dont care who they are
I have no doubt the board is part of the problem, but how do you solve that aspect? Private ownership might be the way to go, but no one would seriously consider buying this club at the moment.
You'd only need interested in the license. Buying the actual club would be cheapish atm.
WT is member owned just like other successful clubs, Panthers, Raiders, Roosters and a few others. While it may present an issue in some cases, ownership is not the real big’n if the organisational structure is sound. Clubs generally don’t publicly display their OC, which is odd? The Broncos are more transparent due to regulatory circumstances, but the others not so. They operate more like a church, with a different kind of religion. The successful clubs seem to have a kind of military precision aura about them.
We're not really member owned. You can't become a member then vote on anything.
If the club wasn’t a “not for profit” then the ATO would call them to account..hahaha
Lol, true.
Maybe that cousins be next year's cliche.
2022 Wests Tigers - Not for profit.
Prefer 2022 Wests Tigers : Up For Sale
Free to a good home.
Drop us off at the doors of RSPCA you reckon ??
Hessian bag and into the creek ?
@jirskyr said in [Maguire's job not on the line: Lee Hagipantelis](/post/1347295) said:Michael Chammas has an agenda against Madge I reckon. He's got two articles ready to roll immediately after the match: lead article on Sunday, analysis on Monday. Nothing about the individual player performances, only commentary on the coach.
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Maguire's job not on the line: Lee Hagipantelis](/post/1347355) said:@elderslie_tiger said in [Maguire's job not on the line: Lee Hagipantelis](/post/1347341) said:Cronulla said the same thing about MORRIS had a meeting with him 24hrs later he was gone
I thought it was outstanding his mother spoke out against the way the Sharks' Board had treated him. Sign him up now. His mother as well.
@jirskyr said in [Maguire's job not on the line: Lee Hagipantelis](/post/1347295) said:Michael Chammas has an agenda against Madge I reckon. He's got two articles ready to roll immediately after the match: lead article on Sunday, analysis on Monday. Nothing about the individual player performances, only commentary on the coach.
@jadtiger said in [Maguire's job not on the line: Lee Hagipantelis](/post/1347213) said:@willow said in [Maguire's job not on the line: Lee Hagipantelis](/post/1347208) said:@jadtiger said in [Maguire's job not on the line: Lee Hagipantelis](/post/1347199) said:@newtown said in [Maguire's job not on the line: Lee Hagipantelis](/post/1347034) said:But we’re not getting the results that we all want. It’s the entire club’s responsibility, and we’re one-in, all-in.”
Somebody should tell that to the 2 mongrels on the board that are excellent at backstabbing and protecting their own interests.Undoubtedly the leaks are coming from at least 1 of them and unfortunately they are seemingly "untouchable" themselves.
That particular cancer still needs to be removed from the club and i dont care who they are
I have no doubt the board is part of the problem, but how do you solve that aspect? Private ownership might be the way to go, but no one would seriously consider buying this club at the moment.
I honestly wish i knew how to solve it but sacking the coach is a knee jerk reaction and will not work.Having unsackable white ants on the board is a certain recipe for continual failure.
@tony-soprano said in [Maguire's job not on the line: Lee Hagipantelis](/post/1347369) said:@jirskyr said in [Maguire's job not on the line: Lee Hagipantelis](/post/1347295) said:Michael Chammas has an agenda against Madge I reckon. He's got two articles ready to roll immediately after the match: lead article on Sunday, analysis on Monday. Nothing about the individual player performances, only commentary on the coach.
I’ve heard him speak about Madge before he had high hopes for us at the start of the season. Some of it is based on facts and the other headlines.
@twentyforty said in [Maguire's job not on the line: Lee Hagipantelis](/post/1347297) said:@gallagher said in [Maguire's job not on the line: Lee Hagipantelis](/post/1347238) said:@willow said in [Maguire's job not on the line: Lee Hagipantelis](/post/1347208) said:@jadtiger said in [Maguire's job not on the line: Lee Hagipantelis](/post/1347199) said:@newtown said in [Maguire's job not on the line: Lee Hagipantelis](/post/1347034) said:But we’re not getting the results that we all want. It’s the entire club’s responsibility, and we’re one-in, all-in.”
Somebody should tell that to the 2 mongrels on the board that are excellent at backstabbing and protecting their own interests.Undoubtedly the leaks are coming from at least 1 of them and unfortunately they are seemingly "untouchable" themselves.
That particular cancer still needs to be removed from the club and i dont care who they are
I have no doubt the board is part of the problem, but how do you solve that aspect? Private ownership might be the way to go, but no one would seriously consider buying this club at the moment.
You'd only need interested in the license. Buying the actual club would be cheapish atm.
WT is member owned just like other successful clubs, Panthers, Raiders, Roosters and a few others. While it may present an issue in some cases, ownership is not the real big’n if the organisational structure is sound. Clubs generally don’t publicly display their OC, which is odd? The Broncos are more transparent due to regulatory circumstances, but the others not so. They operate more like a church, with a different kind of religion. The successful clubs seem to have a kind of military precision aura about them.
@tony-soprano said in [Maguire's job not on the line: Lee Hagipantelis](/post/1347381) said:Madge has coached wins over Australia with NZ. Can only coach good players.
@happy_tiger said in [Maguire's job not on the line: Lee Hagipantelis](/post/1347382) said:@tony-soprano said in [Maguire's job not on the line: Lee Hagipantelis](/post/1347381) said:Madge has coached wins over Australia with NZ. Can only coach good players.
Yet no NZ players are racing to join the WT's .....
That is damning
@elleryhanley said in [Maguire's job not on the line: Lee Hagipantelis](/post/1347379) said:This stat really needs to be in every Madge thread as it gives context of his last two years before us...
**In Maguire’s last 51 games in charge of a star-studded Rabbitohs side, his success rate was even worse (18 wins) than it is now at the Wests Tigers.**
I.e. he has been very bad for several seasons now.
Of coaches who have coached 100 games since 2015, he has, by far, the worst record.
@spartan117 said in [Maguire's job not on the line: Lee Hagipantelis](/post/1347431) said:I am 100% in the Madge Maguire camp.
There is no other coach available that could do better with this club that has been underperforming for almost every year except 3 odd.
@gallagher said in [Maguire's job not on the line: Lee Hagipantelis](/post/1347452) said:@spartan117 said in [Maguire's job not on the line: Lee Hagipantelis](/post/1347431) said:I am 100% in the Madge Maguire camp.
There is no other coach available that could do better with this club that has been underperforming for almost every year except 3 odd.
Bennett or Flanagan would be handy.