Aladinsane
New member
I have been thinking this since the Cowboys game, that Sheens persistence of using 16 playeres for 95% of a match and our poor completion rate this year, was the main reason why we had those four losses lately.
That Cowboys win was a very costly one, not only for losing Tim Moltzen for the year, but the fact we played for most of that match with only 15 players and had to make 64 more tackles than the Cowboys. Being the second leg of a massive road trip, playing the Raiders in Canberra the week before, the Wests Tigers were always going to struggle against the Bulldogs. It didn't help that ref, Jarred Maxwell, had his house on the Bulldogs being the first try scorers , and hence burnt out the Wests Tigers in the first half with the Bulldogs enjoying 60% possession in the first half, and the rest is history. The WT had to make another friggin 66 tackles in that match, and with injuries increasing and Sheens refusal to use the interchange bench properly ( he only played Geoff Daniela(17) for 12 minutes & Willie Mataka(19) for 14 minutes) the main core of the team was burning out fast.
It continued in Round 7 against the Panthers, where the fatigue was starting to show on our team , where they made a massive 89 more tackles than Penrith , and Sheens lack of use of the bench kept on happening , where he left Geoff Daniela warming the bench for 79 minutes….Sheens must have thought he might as well shake hands with the opposition.
Sheens kept the practice of not utilizing the bench again in Round 8 against the Roosters, where the WT were up 8 Nil at half time, only to be run down in the second half by the Rossters 12-8., and yes you guess it, he only used Nathan Waters for 10 minutes in the second half, and Mitch Brown didn't even a start, and as Willow said in his Match report..."Worked on his tan throughout the game sitting on the bench and engaged in several conversations with his manager I think" :laughing: if it wasn't so sad.
In fact ,Sheens's use of Daniel Fitzhenry,from the bench started the burnout, with only playing him for 4 minutes in each of the first 2 games.
In the first 9 games this year, the Wests Tigers have made an incredible 249 tackles than their opposition. I am happy to say the tide changed last night....
1) the lads had to come out committed, and it showed right from the start, except for that Ben Rogers great solo try.The team only had 16 missed tackles.
2) The team's compeletion rate was 83% hence
3) They made 71 FEWER tackles than Newcastle
4) The 3 main interchange players & starting squad all had great games, hence I can understand Sheens only using Brown for 5 minutes or so.
\
\
Anyway, hopefully Sheens has learnt his lesson finally about a bigger pack , so the team doesn't get outmuscled, and that the team keeps focusing on what they did so well last night....a good completetion rate, a low missed tackle count and a 17 man team effort., playing for each other and the pride of our great jersey... :sign:
I still think , that if this balance can be maintained ,the boys stay loyal to each other... **we can make the top 4...**as this comp is a weak one, and up for grabs for any team committed for the entire 80 minutes and a coach willing to learn from his mistakes of the past
What do you guys think ?
That Cowboys win was a very costly one, not only for losing Tim Moltzen for the year, but the fact we played for most of that match with only 15 players and had to make 64 more tackles than the Cowboys. Being the second leg of a massive road trip, playing the Raiders in Canberra the week before, the Wests Tigers were always going to struggle against the Bulldogs. It didn't help that ref, Jarred Maxwell, had his house on the Bulldogs being the first try scorers , and hence burnt out the Wests Tigers in the first half with the Bulldogs enjoying 60% possession in the first half, and the rest is history. The WT had to make another friggin 66 tackles in that match, and with injuries increasing and Sheens refusal to use the interchange bench properly ( he only played Geoff Daniela(17) for 12 minutes & Willie Mataka(19) for 14 minutes) the main core of the team was burning out fast.
It continued in Round 7 against the Panthers, where the fatigue was starting to show on our team , where they made a massive 89 more tackles than Penrith , and Sheens lack of use of the bench kept on happening , where he left Geoff Daniela warming the bench for 79 minutes….Sheens must have thought he might as well shake hands with the opposition.
Sheens kept the practice of not utilizing the bench again in Round 8 against the Roosters, where the WT were up 8 Nil at half time, only to be run down in the second half by the Rossters 12-8., and yes you guess it, he only used Nathan Waters for 10 minutes in the second half, and Mitch Brown didn't even a start, and as Willow said in his Match report..."Worked on his tan throughout the game sitting on the bench and engaged in several conversations with his manager I think" :laughing: if it wasn't so sad.
In fact ,Sheens's use of Daniel Fitzhenry,from the bench started the burnout, with only playing him for 4 minutes in each of the first 2 games.
In the first 9 games this year, the Wests Tigers have made an incredible 249 tackles than their opposition. I am happy to say the tide changed last night....
1) the lads had to come out committed, and it showed right from the start, except for that Ben Rogers great solo try.The team only had 16 missed tackles.
2) The team's compeletion rate was 83% hence
3) They made 71 FEWER tackles than Newcastle
4) The 3 main interchange players & starting squad all had great games, hence I can understand Sheens only using Brown for 5 minutes or so.
\
\
Anyway, hopefully Sheens has learnt his lesson finally about a bigger pack , so the team doesn't get outmuscled, and that the team keeps focusing on what they did so well last night....a good completetion rate, a low missed tackle count and a 17 man team effort., playing for each other and the pride of our great jersey... :sign:
I still think , that if this balance can be maintained ,the boys stay loyal to each other... **we can make the top 4...**as this comp is a weak one, and up for grabs for any team committed for the entire 80 minutes and a coach willing to learn from his mistakes of the past
What do you guys think ?