tigermaniac
Well-known member
Good call. Was hoping he wouldn't face us.
\
\
_Posted using RoarFEED 2012_
\
\
_Posted using RoarFEED 2012_
Mini gets off.
- Thread starter tigermaniac
- Start date
TigerFlame
New member
What? You said good call and you were hoping he would not face us?
Fraze23
Well-known member
Compare that to what Blair got for a leg pull. Absolutely ridiculous. There's no consistency anywhere in the NRL.
\
\
_Posted using RoarFEED 2012_
\
\
_Posted using RoarFEED 2012_
TigerFlame
New member
lol you need to have a look at the roosters forum they are going off in anger lol
tigermaniac
Well-known member
@TigerFlame said:
He's a gun player for them and I fear him. I think the judiciary made the right call. That is it that I have confused you with. Read the thread title.
\
\
_Posted using RoarFEED 2012_
TigerFlame
New member
@tigermaniac said:
oh sorry just got it lol
Tuiaki4life
New member
With or without Mini if we can't beat the Chooks then we have no right being in the 8.
\
\
_Posted using RoarFEED 2012_
\
\
_Posted using RoarFEED 2012_
Still cant see what OP is getting at
G
Guest
Guest
@innsaneink said:
Poorly phrased to say the least. In short however, Minichello was cleared by the judiciary and will now line up against the Tigers on Sunday arvo.
I don't care whether or not he plays against us, if we are serious about making the 8 we should win regardless. However after seeing the footage, I don't know how the hell he got off. Inglis got 3 weeks for less, Burns got something like 9 for something similar and Mini gets 0.
If Blair takes his head off I expect him to get off too. The NRL have set a very dangerous precedence now.
If Blair takes his head off I expect him to get off too. The NRL have set a very dangerous precedence now.
851
Well-known member
@Fraze23 said:
The officialdom on and off the field this year has been disgraceful.
PYMBLEPETE
New member
Can the NRL not get anything right?
Apparently had he been charged with dangerous contact or careless high he would have almost certainly been suspended. It was the more serious charge of striking which was not proven that got him off - with nothing! Too bad Blair wasnt charged with striking.
A fair dinkum farcial joke when compared with Blair getting a week. And coming in the same week as the Hampstead circus!
Apparently had he been charged with dangerous contact or careless high he would have almost certainly been suspended. It was the more serious charge of striking which was not proven that got him off - with nothing! Too bad Blair wasnt charged with striking.
A fair dinkum farcial joke when compared with Blair getting a week. And coming in the same week as the Hampstead circus!
@willow said:
Yes That part is clear, he also said ''its good''…then said he hopes we dont face him...but with him getting off he WILL face us, so how its good has me baffled
\
\
Anyway....this is one of the worst decisions Ive seen in a long long time....not what you know its who you know, this stinks to high heaven...almost to a corrupt level
Go_Moltzen
Member
W A F Joke.
Precedent precedent precedent.
Shame shame shame.
Precedent precedent precedent.
Shame shame shame.
happy_tiger
Well-known member
@willow said:
Any idea Willow why What precedent or reason they used for dropping a grading 3 charge to nothing ??
After what happened on Friday and with the FTA rights I am quickly losing faith in the ARLC even at this stage
Maybe young Grant has been told he won't be resigned and Daddy's pissed about it
Staff online
-
DempsModerator