I'm picking up from "GuyOT's" comment about playing 80 minutes and maintaining strategy. I agree and, if my assumptions are correct, that is what Taylor is trying to instil in the WT's inexperienced players. That is what 'playing to the structure' and keeping the halves 'on the leash' is all about. Learning to play the grind every set. Ok you just ran in 22 unopposed points. Next set back into the grind. If the opportunity presents itself you will score again, if not you have maintained pressure.
The loss to Canberra will provide leadership training examples for the halves. How to take control of the side and the game. How to maintain pressure on the opponent and how and when to relieve pressure on your own team.
I make the assumption that this must be maddeningly frustrating for Robbie, having to take a back seat and watch while Moses and Brooks learn their trade. It may also be that the periods when Robbie is off the field will be the ones Taylor is most interested in as far as Brooks and Moses are concerned.
If I'm correct, Taylor has thrown Brooks and Moses in the deep end, is doing a great job working patiently to his plan and the Team have truly bought into it.
On the other hand of course this could be complete BS.
The loss to Canberra will provide leadership training examples for the halves. How to take control of the side and the game. How to maintain pressure on the opponent and how and when to relieve pressure on your own team.
I make the assumption that this must be maddeningly frustrating for Robbie, having to take a back seat and watch while Moses and Brooks learn their trade. It may also be that the periods when Robbie is off the field will be the ones Taylor is most interested in as far as Brooks and Moses are concerned.
If I'm correct, Taylor has thrown Brooks and Moses in the deep end, is doing a great job working patiently to his plan and the Team have truly bought into it.
On the other hand of course this could be complete BS.