happy_tiger
Well-known member
@ said:They're Very creative accountants over there.
O'Sullivan is now at the Warriors Spartan …..
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@ said:They're Very creative accountants over there.
@ said:@ said:They're Very creative accountants over there.
O'Sullivan is now at the Warriors Spartan …..
@ said:@ said:@ said:@ said:Sharks are offering 450k take it or leave it to the Dogs. I know the deal was signed off by the Sharks last week.
I don’t rate Woods but it makes no sense paying 450k for him to play elsewhere for the Dogs a capable replacement would cost at least 350k. It saves peanuts.
Doubt they would agree to that, but at that price, I certainly would not mind him back.
We won’t commit that money to another prop in either case. Other holes to fill Woods doesn’t fit he is a high minute plodder ala Tolman. We have good props but need an impact prop off the bench basically the opposite of Woods. To run hard, hit hard and cover for 30 minutes a game.
A Sam Moa, Ava type player.
Bunty Afoa.
@ said:@ said:They're Very creative accountants over there.
O'Sullivan is now at the Warriors Spartan …..
@ said:@ said:@ said:@ said:Doubt they would agree to that, but at that price, I certainly would not mind him back.
We won’t commit that money to another prop in either case. Other holes to fill Woods doesn’t fit he is a high minute plodder ala Tolman. We have good props but need an impact prop off the bench basically the opposite of Woods. To run hard, hit hard and cover for 30 minutes a game.
A Sam Moa, Ava type player.
Bunty Afoa.
Matagi from parra. I don’t understand why Arthur keeps leaving him out of the team. He’s better than 29-minute Mannah
@ said:Apparently Bulldogs don't want to pay anything and sharks wont budge unless Dogs pay majority.
Trent said today Roosters are definitely not interested.
Can only see Newcastle paying a huge amount but that might not be a good enough club to carry Woods to a finals series like he wants.
Good player but no where near 900k, I am glad we didn't sign him for that much.
@ said:Terrible handling?
@ said:Somehow the Mbye thread has turned into the woods thread…
@ said:Somehow the Mbye thread has turned into the woods thread…
@ said:@ said:Apparently Bulldogs don't want to pay anything and sharks wont budge unless Dogs pay majority.
Trent said today Roosters are definitely not interested.
Can only see Newcastle paying a huge amount but that might not be a good enough club to carry Woods to a finals series like he wants.
Good player but no where near 900k, I am glad we didn't sign him for that much.
The only reason why Woods is on $800k-$900k is not because he is worth it (obviously other clubs aren't convinced)…its because the Tigers were offering him upwards of $1m per year to keep him here, and his Manager used that figure as a bargaining chip elsewhere and now regrettably the dogs fell for it....Woods is a $600k player tops....and now clubs are realizing this is his true value,... haha..If I were Woods I'd say to the Dogs..."I'm staying here for the next 3.5 years"...!
@ said:@ said:Apparently Bulldogs don't want to pay anything and sharks wont budge unless Dogs pay majority.
Trent said today Roosters are definitely not interested.
Can only see Newcastle paying a huge amount but that might not be a good enough club to carry Woods to a finals series like he wants.
Good player but no where near 900k, I am glad we didn't sign him for that much.
The only reason why Woods is on $800k-$900k is not because he is worth it (obviously other clubs aren't convinced)…its because the Tigers were offering him upwards of $1m per year to keep him here, and his Manager used that figure as a bargaining chip elsewhere and now regrettably the dogs fell for it....Woods is a $600k player tops....and now clubs are realizing this is his true value,... haha..If I were Woods I'd say to the Dogs..."I'm staying here for the next 3.5 years"...!
@ said:@ said:Apparently Bulldogs don't want to pay anything and sharks wont budge unless Dogs pay majority.
Trent said today Roosters are definitely not interested.
Can only see Newcastle paying a huge amount but that might not be a good enough club to carry Woods to a finals series like he wants.
Good player but no where near 900k, I am glad we didn't sign him for that much.
The only reason why Woods is on $800k-$900k is not because he is worth it (obviously other clubs aren't convinced)…its because the Tigers were offering him upwards of $1m per year to keep him here, and his Manager used that figure as a bargaining chip elsewhere and now regrettably the dogs fell for it....Woods is a $600k player tops....and now clubs are realizing this is his true value,... haha..If I were Woods I'd say to the Dogs..."I'm staying here for the next 3.5 years"...!