If Nathan and Ivan become a combo team (that's still an IF, I haven't heard Nathan talk up playing under his dad too much), it's up to us to keep or loose them. Roosters, Panthers or hey a cashed up Bulldogs/whomever will be placing their bids. We know this, we know that if Nathan has the goods then the cash will flow.
Ivan too isn't a supercoach. He is a good club coach. He can get teams to the top 4 in the past but he isn't a Flanagan, Green let alone a Bennett or Bellamy. Don't get me wrong he is exactly what we need, but we shouldn't see supermoney go for him.
Yes the Roosters will offer corporate deals and yes some club somewhere will go all out. Yet we got Benji and Beau on TV, we can still do our deals. The Panthers will try their best to be a great club for Nathan and we can try our best to be a great club for Ivan. One of the big cat teams should get these two.
If the Roosters, Cronulla or anyone else sign the Duo, then we need to fire the board (barring the stupid Rugby League normal happenings or Ivan/Nathan not performing). Ivan has built the team here, he has selected the players and has a good relationship with them. Nathan and/or Ivan will want to play with their mates. Sure Nick Politis and others will call in the favours (if Nick even wants Ivan) but we should see Ivan stay with what he has built.
He might've won a premiership but to say Flanagan is worth mentioning in the same paragraph with Green, Bellamy, Bennett etc. is just folly.
Cleary may not be a supercoach but imo he would buy and sell Flanagan and he doesn't need to condone peptides to do it.
2017 showed how good Flanagan is .. to my mind not as good as Robinson, Arthur and a few others as well.
Robinson???
He has a superstar team and Nick Politis.
In the preliminary final, he played 2 backrowers in the centres and a winger on the bench.
He'd struggle to make the top 8 coaches in the NRL
If you read what I said correctly which was… Flanagan ( Mr Peptides) is not as good as Robinson.
Nothing else. I don't care if he played 17 back rowers, that is not the point.