News Reports about Wests Tigers

@crusader said:
Sad sad people here. Wtf is this
\
\
_Posted using RoarFEED 2012_

Sad indeed. How can you call yourself a supporter when you openly admit to hating one half of the JV. You're not a supporter, you're a troll. Pretty pathetic
 
@Karma Tiger said:
@Benjirific said:
@Gary Bakerloo said:
@Rambo2714 said:
Unless there is a name of some one from the club in the report , and what they said in quotation marks , don't believe it .

Ok - can we believe and discuss the quotes in this article?

http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/league-news/farah-considers-offer-from-eels-20120922-26dmk.html

Primarily:

_Wests Magpies director Rick Wayde said the state of Balmain's finances should soon change the perception about who was the dominant partner in the merger. ''Balmain people might then need to ask, 'Wests, can you help us? There's a huge [financial] burden at the moment,'' Wayde said. ''There's an element who'd like to pay [Sheens] out but they can't come up with the money … and Balmain couldn't come up with their half of the payout at this time.''_

Mr Wayde isn't a director of Wests Tigers, so I wouldn't be taking his comments about the JV very seriously. On his comments however, I would like a situation where there wouldn't be a 'dominant' partner in the merger, or is the 50/50 claims by the Western Suburbs side just a façade for them wanting to be back in the NRL?

Mr Wayde is a director of Wests Magpies which is a 50% owner of Wests tigers so his opinion should be given more respect to what you're allowing.You are right in saying there shouldnt be a dominant partner because in reality Balmain and Wests both have given about 50% over the years and I must say in regards to balmains debt wests silence has been deafening as they continue to support their jv partner and its struggle.This in the face of Humphreys saying get stuffed wests im showing more love to Ryde Eastwood that 0% owner of the jv.I think you will find the only "facade" as you put it is by fans such as yourself who feel a little intimidated at what Wests are rightfully claiming is theirs a 50%share in this jv.

What I was trying to say was that as he is not a director of the Wests Tigers, it is probably inappropriate for him to be commenting on their finances, he should be leaving such public comment to the Wests Tigers directors from the Wests Group if that is an issue which they feel needs discussing (personally I don't think the finances of the club is something that should be discussed publicly, it is for the knowledge of the board and members of the respective Leagues and Football clubs). As for the intimidation factor, that is extremely far from the truth. I believe there should be a more 50/50 split in the joint-venture, but more importantly I think it should be along the lines of promoting Wests Tigers as one brand rather than simply promoting Wests Magpies more than we currently do to even the share. There should be a better emphasis on the Wests side for sure, but I'm sick to death of people calling for things to be Balmain branded and Wests branded. We should be one club and act as such, promote everything as WESTS TIGERS, have our celebrations in the heritage rounds as well as one of the Leichhardt and Campbelltown games each, then leave the remainder for celebrating our club as one and it's future.
 
@Karma Tiger said:
@Rambo2714 said:
In the last few weeks we have had the print and online media writing all sorts of stuff a bout Wests Tigers

Only thing to be reported correctly was beau and Heighno

We had numerous reports that Sheens had been sacked

Then it was that Sheens had quit

There were reports that Matt Parish would be coach next year

Reports that Ayshford was being shopped around
\
\
And all turned out to BS , way off the mark no one was even close including our friend georgeb ….

Lesson is its not official until its official

Hunphries was heard on radio telling Wests fans something that Benji said earlier in the year

Unless there is a name of some one from the club in the report , and what they said in quotation marks , don't believe it .
\
\
_Posted using RoarFEED 2012_

And what if one week from now sheens quits before he ws sacked and parish is coach.You may need to revisit your statement.

Well no I won't need to , because the reports all put dates to the Claims

IE dean Ritchie and Josh Massoud bot made made separate reports to effect that

Tim Sheens was gona be sacked last Thursday
Tim Sheens quit on MONDAY AFTERNOON

Dean Ritchie went on to say that Sheens said his goodbyes to players , but not Benji or Robbie , and he also told Brian Hyderabad that he wouldn't have a job

It is now known that of that was a load of crap , and we know for fact that Sheens did not quit on Monday Afternoon . And he wasn't sacked on Thursday .
\
\
_Posted using RoarFEED 2012_
 
@Rambo2714 said:
@Karma Tiger said:
@Rambo2714 said:
In the last few weeks we have had the print and online media writing all sorts of stuff a bout Wests Tigers

Only thing to be reported correctly was beau and Heighno

We had numerous reports that Sheens had been sacked

Then it was that Sheens had quit

There were reports that Matt Parish would be coach next year

Reports that Ayshford was being shopped around
\
\
And all turned out to BS , way off the mark no one was even close including our friend georgeb ….

Lesson is its not official until its official

Hunphries was heard on radio telling Wests fans something that Benji said earlier in the year

Unless there is a name of some one from the club in the report , and what they said in quotation marks , don't believe it .
\
\
_Posted using RoarFEED 2012_

And what if one week from now sheens quits before he ws sacked and parish is coach.You may need to revisit your statement.

Well no I won't need to , because the reports all put dates to the Claims

IE dean Ritchie and Josh Massoud bot made made separate reports to effect that

Tim Sheens was gona be sacked last Thursday
Tim Sheens quit on MONDAY AFTERNOON

Dean Ritchie went on to say that Sheens said his goodbyes to players , but not Benji or Robbie , and he also told Brian Hyderabad that he wouldn't have a job

It is now known that of that was a load of crap , and we know for fact that Sheens did not quit on Monday Afternoon . And he wasn't sacked on Thursday .
\
\
_Posted using RoarFEED 2012_

The Ritchie report was accurate right up to the point where he said sheens never called benji and Robbie. That is absolutely false. It is a fact that he had a 1 and 1/2 hour conversation with one of those two. I could repeat the whole conversation to you if you like.
Please Rambo don't believe everything you read in the DT or what humpty chooses to sugarcoat .
\
\
_Posted using RoarFEED 2012_
 
I could repeat the whole conversation to you if you like.

Go for it. :unamused:

Please rambo dont believe the DT….just believe george
 
Ah Rambo. It goes like this. Rick is right. Rothfield is wrong. Georgebeema and Ritchie are partly right or wrong. Benji and Robbie are either telling the truth or lying. Sheens you don't know if he's coming or going. Balmain is gone, so is Beau and Heino. I'm probably half right here, but Rambo didn't you say you were getting WT gold memberships. You were so happy, rubbing your hands together, but now your not going to, right or wrong. Enjoy the view and the ride.
\
\
_Posted using RoarFEED 2012_
 
@georgebeema said:
@innsaneink said:
I could repeat the whole conversation to you if you like.

Go for it.

Please rambo dont believe the DT….just believe george

COULD not would
\
\
_Posted using RoarFEED 2012_

Bluff called and folded :laughing:
 
Anyone hear on the 8.30 2KY news bulletin where they said Sheens won't be accepting another role with the club? Literally five minutes after Humphreys had been on there saying that wasn't determined yet?
 
@Chris said:
He hasn't decided yet. Don't expect a decision any time soon on what Tim is going to do.

If he has any respect for himself he would leave rather than accept a menial job.
They are giving him a bit of time to find something else - in reality it is of no real consequence unless it lessens the payout.
He's gone from having any more influence over our first grade team and we should all be glad of that.
 
The situation Tim finds himself in isn't as black and white as what everyone thinks. He wont be controlling the NRL team, that's the bottom line. What he does now is really immaterial in the grand scheme of things, right? All the fans and players wanted him sacked as coach, that's happened now. Instead of climbing all over the bloke's back, how about we start worrying who the new coach is going to be. Isn't that the most important thing now?
 
@cktiger said:
@Chris said:
He hasn't decided yet. Don't expect a decision any time soon on what Tim is going to do.

If he has any respect for himself he would leave rather than accept a menial job.
They are giving him a bit of time to find something else - in reality it is of no real consequence unless it lessens the payout.
He's gone from having any more influence over our first grade team and we should all be glad of that.

I think if he isnt happy with whatever he is left with, he is left with no choice but to leave [no payout]… All they have to do is have the new job title for the incoming Coach different to 'Head Coach'?

He will be foolish to stick around, and Humpty may have saved the Club some good coin!
 
@Tiger Watto said:
@cktiger said:
@Chris said:
He hasn't decided yet. Don't expect a decision any time soon on what Tim is going to do.

If he has any respect for himself he would leave rather than accept a menial job.
They are giving him a bit of time to find something else - in reality it is of no real consequence unless it lessens the payout.
He's gone from having any more influence over our first grade team and we should all be glad of that.

I think if he isnt happy with whatever he is left with, he is left with no choice but to leave [no payout]… All they have to do is have the new job title for the incoming Coach different to 'Head Coach'?

He will be foolish to stick around, and Humpty may have saved the Club some good coin!

I don't think Sheens is that stupid , he must have a Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon card up his sleeve
 
Back
Top