Not that it matters now (Woods and Farah)

@goldcoast tiger said:
@innsaneink said:
@hobbo2803 said:
@Geo. said:
Dene Halatau's name was also on the scoreboard if you look closely…Could have invited him up there for a 'quiet' moment ..with the Fox camera's and reporter..

3's a Crowd..?

Lol.. You are really showing your true colours with your constant little Farah digs .
I thought it was a great way for Robbie to say farewell to the club and reflect upon the time he spent with us .
My mrs even shed a tear while watching the footage ….

Yeh ayoub knows there plenty of gullible ones out there…. Uses people an dmedia to shore up support
Poor sad lonely robbie

Going by the crowds reaction at the game , I think the support for him greatly exceed what a few bitter and twisted Nuffies on a media forum think. It's not him that they boo whenever he is introduced at the ground , and I don't think that he will waste much time worrying what what is said here or on any forum. He has to sort out what he'l do with all that WTs money that they thought they'd save :laughing:
 
@goldcoast tiger said:
@GNR4LIFE said:
@goldcoast tiger said:
@GNR4LIFE said:
Probably why they signed him. Farah's one of the best hatchet men in the business.

And your source for this insightful tid bit is ?

The same one that says apparently Souths are picking up a marquee hooker for nothing.

I love your fantasy posts
I haven't seen a single post that said they were getting anyone for nothing.
**But as usual your post is is full of BS**
But if the more accurate ( thankfully ) SMH, report is correct,
Pascoe and Taylor were given a work over in the negotiations .
After all that crap that our dumbo Coachwe save about enough to buy a new ball boy .
Good work by our "professionly " run club. :crazy

What are you on about, you said yourself yesterday they were getting a marquee hooker cheap as if it were gospel. Nice selective memory there.
 
@Flippedy said:
Why is everyone trying to make some conspiracy theory about Farah sitting up on the scoreboard after the game? It's just called reminiscing! It's what people do when a career or a certain phase of their lives comes to an end - they go back to where it all began and reminisce! Robbie loves Leichhardt Oval, he has great memories from there, it was his final farewell to the only club he ever really wanted to play for and he won't be playing at Leichhardt, in that capacity, EVER again. Seriously guys, there was nothing sinister in it - I thought it was cool and I would've done the same thing.

Shhh you are making far to much sense for the tin foil hat brigade
 
Irrespective if you love or hate Robbie,he is gone and about to embark on another footballing adventure..

All the best Rob,Wests Tigers will power ahead as a club and team….

I personally cant wait to see some new talent at the club in the next couple of years,and that includes a new coach if need be...

" If you climb the ladder of life and help someone on the way,someone will also help you"
" If you climb the ladder of life and crap on someone on the way,some one will crap on you"

Quote from TTs book of knowledge....... :smiley:
 
@goldcoast tiger said:
@GNR4LIFE said:
@MacDougall said:
Fairly sure Maguire has a few enemies in the playing group at Souths so if Farah goes there it won't take long for rumours to surface.

Probably why they signed him. Farah's one of the best hatchet men in the business.

And your source for this insightful tid bit is ?

Absolute joke the whole Farah coach slayer crap. Most long serving players play under three coaches at least. Unless of course if you are Cam Smith Billy Slater and Cooper Cronk for the very simple reason their coach is a successful one!
Simon Mannering leaves Farah for dead - up to six - and led a senior playing group to oust Elliot who didn't suit their playing style. And yet was recently hailed by his club for 250 games - go figure.
 
@GNR4LIFE said:
@cktiger said:
@Harvey said:
@cktiger said:
Dene's afraid of heights .
Nice bloke and decent player but didn't quite reach Farah's level as a player either.

Which of them has played the most tests? Which has played the most finals? Which has played the most 1st grade games?

I'll put it more simply for you - Dene was never as good a player as Farah … ever.

Regardless, no need to denigrate a club legend at the expense of Farah

I wasn't denigrating Dene - he deserved his recognition and got it.
Some people are having a go at how Farah said his goodbyes however.
Comment in regards to their playing abilities is just a fact.
 
Probably time to wind up this thread don't you think? It was supposed to be about Farah and Woods. But once again, it's morphed into a Farah hard - done by or not thread.
 
@GNR4LIFE said:
@goldcoast tiger said:
@GNR4LIFE said:
@goldcoast tiger said:
And your source for this insightful tid bit is ?

The same one that says apparently Souths are picking up a marquee hooker for nothing.

I love your fantasy posts
I haven't seen a single post that said they were getting anyone for nothing.
**But as usual your post is is full of BS**
But if the more accurate ( thankfully ) SMH, report is correct,
Pascoe and Taylor were given a work over in the negotiations .
After all that crap that our dumbo Coachwe save about enough to buy a new ball boy .
Good work by our "professionly " run club. :crazy

What are you on about, you said yourself yesterday they were getting a marquee hooker cheap as if it were gospel. Nice selective memory there.

It's now obvious that you don't even read **your OWN posts. As well as other's posts**
Your fantasy post said that apparently they were picking up a Marquee hooker for NOTHING.
While I , at no stage said that. Or have even read that , in any posts or reports. After I stated that to you that fact, you then accuse me of selective memory.
I think your memory needs some help .
Your next sentence verified that you were wrong, and what I actually DID say , was "Cheap ". ( not , "for nothing) "
There can be quite a difference)

But thank you for admitting that you misquoted me in the beginning.
 
Splitting hairs now i see. That's where we're at. Nothing, cheap, whatever. Either way you're taking an article claiming we took a hit financially in this as gospel while laughing at others for posting hearsay because it goes against your agenda. You'll believe whatever suits you.
 
lol i hope this drags out until pre-season, otherwise off season is gonna be so bloody boring this year.

anyway, shouldn't this thread be in the NRL section now? or maybe super league.
 
RF deserved his moment in the spotlight. From where I sit his sitting on the scoreboard was a legitimate one. All his other recent ones have been just grabs for attention. There is so much talk on here about what a difference he might have made to the Raiders game if he was chosen to play. It can just as easily be speculated that if Tigers had dumped him months before they did they wouldn't have even had to be playing that game to make the final 8 because the would have already been there. Speculation…
 
@GNR4LIFE said:
Splitting hairs now i see. That's where we're at. Nothing, cheap, whatever. Either way you're taking an article claiming we took a hit financially in this as gospel while laughing at others for posting hearsay because it goes against your agenda. You'll believe whatever suits you.

You call misquoting , splitting hairs now, you said "they got him for nothing", I said they "got him cheap"Your inaccuracy amazes me, but it shouldn't
 
@goldcoast tiger said:
@GNR4LIFE said:
Splitting hairs now i see. That's where we're at. Nothing, cheap, whatever. Either way you're taking an article claiming we took a hit financially in this as gospel while laughing at others for posting hearsay because it goes against your agenda. You'll believe whatever suits you.

You call misquoting , splitting hairs now, you said "they got him for nothing", I said they "got him cheap"Your inaccuracy amazes me, but it shouldn't

Again with semantics. It doesn't change my point. You were digging the boot into the club for coming out on the losing end based off speculation in an article. Yet you expect a concrete source on hearsay that goes against your agenda.

Simple enough for you?
 
@GNR4LIFE said:
@goldcoast tiger said:
@GNR4LIFE said:
Splitting hairs now i see. That's where we're at. Nothing, cheap, whatever. Either way you're taking an article claiming we took a hit financially in this as gospel while laughing at others for posting hearsay because it goes against your agenda. You'll believe whatever suits you.

You call misquoting , splitting hairs now, you said "they got him for nothing", I said they "got him cheap"Your inaccuracy amazes me, but it shouldn't

Again with semantics. It doesn't change my point. You were digging the boot into the club for coming out on the losing end based off speculation in an article. Yet you expect a concrete source on hearsay that goes against your agenda.

Simple enough for you?

Simple alright, that you cannot make yourself admit that you were dopey enough to miss quote someone when it is in black and white. then want to slide out of the mistake.
So il make it even easier for you,
Tell me where and when I have posted that Souths were getting anyone for free , and I'll be happy to apologise profusely to you.
If you find that too hard to do, it says plenty about you.
You don't get shot for telling the truth here, GNR , or for being wrong.
Nice try on changing the subject though,
 
@goldcoast tiger said:
@GNR4LIFE said:
@goldcoast tiger said:
@GNR4LIFE said:
Splitting hairs now i see. That's where we're at. Nothing, cheap, whatever. Either way you're taking an article claiming we took a hit financially in this as gospel while laughing at others for posting hearsay because it goes against your agenda. You'll believe whatever suits you.

You call misquoting , splitting hairs now, you said "they got him for nothing", I said they "got him cheap"Your inaccuracy amazes me, but it shouldn't

Again with semantics. It doesn't change my point. You were digging the boot into the club for coming out on the losing end based off speculation in an article. Yet you expect a concrete source on hearsay that goes against your agenda.

Simple enough for you?

Simple alright, that you cannot make yourself admit that you were dopey enough to miss quote someone when it is in black and white. then want to slide out of the mistake.
So il make it even easier for you,
Tell me where and when I have posted that Souths were getting anyone for free , and I'll be happy to apologise profusely to you.
If you find that too hard to do, it says plenty about you.
You don't get shot for telling the truth here, GNR , or for being wrong.
Nice try on changing the subject though,

Geezus. I'm not denying anything. You got me, i got the wording wrong. Feel better?

Now that that is cleared up, i'll say for a 3rd time that it doesn't change the point i made. Hope it finally registers.
 
This story is 100% true, even if it is not. I believe all anti-Farah press. There's no reason it's not true. We all know Robbie Farah is one of the least liked men in the NRL, therefore there is no chance of disproving the allegations. Sorry, **facts**.

Unfortunately, a huge majority of this club, a lot of which use the Wests Tigers official Facebook page, are as clueless as Donald Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon supporters over in Yankville.

Anywho, enjoy the off season everyone. May your god (Farah for some of you) be with you.

![](http://i.imgur.com/Sy0bS5V.jpg?1)
 
@GNR4LIFE said:
@goldcoast tiger said:
@GNR4LIFE said:
@goldcoast tiger said:
You call misquoting , splitting hairs now, you said "they got him for nothing", I said they "got him cheap"Your inaccuracy amazes me, but it shouldn't

Again with semantics. It doesn't change my point. You were digging the boot into the club for coming out on the losing end based off speculation in an article. Yet you expect a concrete source on hearsay that goes against your agenda.

Simple enough for you?

Simple alright, that you cannot make yourself admit that you were dopey enough to miss quote someone when it is in black and white. then want to slide out of the mistake.
So il make it even easier for you,
Tell me where and when I have posted that Souths were getting anyone for free , and I'll be happy to apologise profusely to you.
If you find that too hard to do, it says plenty about you.
You don't get shot for telling the truth here, GNR , or for being wrong.
Nice try on changing the subject though,

Geezus. I'm not denying anything. You got me, i got the wording wrong. Feel better?

Now that that is cleared up, i'll say for a 3rd time that it doesn't change the point i made. Hope it finally registers.

You got the facts wrong . End of story
 
@goldcoast tiger said:
@GNR4LIFE said:
@goldcoast tiger said:
@GNR4LIFE said:
Again with semantics. It doesn't change my point. You were digging the boot into the club for coming out on the losing end based off speculation in an article. Yet you expect a concrete source on hearsay that goes against your agenda.

Simple enough for you?

Simple alright, that you cannot make yourself admit that you were dopey enough to miss quote someone when it is in black and white. then want to slide out of the mistake.
So il make it even easier for you,
Tell me where and when I have posted that Souths were getting anyone for free , and I'll be happy to apologise profusely to you.
If you find that too hard to do, it says plenty about you.
You don't get shot for telling the truth here, GNR , or for being wrong.
Nice try on changing the subject though,

Geezus. I'm not denying anything. You got me, i got the wording wrong. Feel better?

Now that that is cleared up, i'll say for a 3rd time that it doesn't change the point i made. Hope it finally registers.

You got the facts wrong . End of story

The facts are you took the article about the 750k as gospel, then expected a concrete source on Farah's behaviour when both stories are as skeptical as each other. All to suit your agenda. Then tried to deflect when got found out. End of story.
 

Latest posts

Staff online

Members online

Back
Top