NRL FINALS SYSTEM CHANGED for 2012

underdog

Well-known member
source: http://www.nrl.com/nrl-finals-system-changed/tabid/10874/newsid/65960/default.aspx

The Australian Rugby League Commission has announced a change to the 2012 Telstra Premiership Finals Series at today’s NRL Chief Executives’ meeting in Sydney.

On the day of the official season launch, the Commission informed clubs that it had accepted a recommendation to move away from the McIntyre system which had been a part of the Telstra Premiership since 1999.

For the first time since 1996, the competition will split the top four and the bottom four finalists into separate pools in week one of the Telstra Premiership Finals Series (The Australian Rugby League used such a model in both 1995 and 1996).

Whereas the McIntyre system ‘seeded’ the eight finalists so that the top four played the bottom four, the 2012 system will see the top four teams and bottom four teams split into separate pools in the first week.

“As the competition has become closer and the impact of ‘home and away’ finals matches even more significant, the system has become a source of increasing debate,” ARLC Chief Executive, Mr David Gallop, said today.

“The allocation of ‘home venues’ in the second week of the McIntyre system has been a particular concern.

“After going through a thorough process we are confident that this is the right time for this change.”

The recommendation to the Commission follows an extensive review process conducted by ARLC General Manager of Football Operations, Mr Nathan McGuirk.

“Over the past few months we have been conducting a review with clubs and with the recently formed Competition Committee,” Mr McGuirk said.

“An overwhelming majority of clubs have shifted their support away from the McIntyre system and to one where the top four teams play each other in week one.

“It offers greater protection for the top four teams and the possibility of even closer matches.

“Each of the top four teams needs only to win two finals matches to reach the Grand Final, while the bottom four ranked teams must win three.

“The Minor Premiers and Team 2 are each guaranteed two home games.”

The Telstra Premiership finals system will continue to be played on the basis of ‘home city’ venues in week one and two and ‘home region’ venues in week three.

![](http://www.rugbyleague.com.au/finals_series_620.jpg)
\
\
- THATS MASSIVE!
 
Great news.

I like the fact the top 4 teams are guaranteed two weeks, and the top 2 teams are guaranteed two 'home' games.
 
Good to see the commission making the big decisions. So far they don't seem to be afraid to admit that things aren't working and change them.

Lets hope it keeps up.
 
I hope this is a sign from the commission that they'll have the guts to CONSTANTLY make the decisions that need to be made, and not just a one-off thing to make them look like they're doing something. Keep it up!
 
this makes me sad. i think im one of the few people that prefer the mcintyre system. its more exciting in my opinion. biggest flaw with this new system is that if team 1 or 2 lose in week one, they cant meet in the grandfinal
 
I like it, the top 4 are rewarded and teams 1 and 2 justifiably get 2 home games. Works for me whether the Tigers get there or not.
 
excellent news
this system is fairer.

stevo-o, you are wrong

Week 1:
T1 v T4, T1 wins

Week 2:
T4 v T5/T8, T4 wins
T1 has week off

Week 3:
T4 vs winner of T2 v T3 from week 1, T4 wins
T1 vs loser (presumable) of T2 v T3 from Week 1, T1 wins

Grand Final:
T1 vs T4
 
@Kul said:
excellent news
this system is fairer.

stevo-o, you are wrong

Week 1:
T1 v T4, T1 wins

Week 2:
T4 v T5/T8, T4 wins
T1 has week off

Week 3:
T4 vs winner of T2 v T3 from week 1, T4 wins
T1 vs loser (presumable) of T2 v T3 from Week 1, T1 wins

Grand Final:
T1 vs T4

what? i think u misunderstood… i said if either team 1 or team 2 lose their game in week one they cant meet in the grandfinal. "they" being teams 1 and 2\. im not wrong.
 
What about adopting the American style where they they have devisional championships. For example we have 16 teams so 4 divisions of 4 teams. E.g tigers/paramatta/penrith/bulldogs. And then the top team from each division plus the next2 or 4 best ranked teams make the finals. Then have the top 4 teams ranked and they get drawn a wild card team. I would love to see a home and away series (like soccer) to decide preliminary finals and then one grand final.

In all it's silly how team 8 of 16 can win a final. We need 6 finals teams. So 4\. Divisions with 2 wild cards.

West division: tigers-eels-bulldogs-panthers.

East div: roosters-souths-manly-dragons

Northern div: Brisbane-titans-cowboys-knights

Southern: new Zealand-Canberra-Melbourne-sharks
\
\
Posted using RoarFEED
 
I actually think Week 1 of the McIntyre is superior - 1 should be playing 8, as reward. Problem was always week 2 cross-over, which lead to arbitrary matchups (e.g. 2011 3rd place Broncos belt 6th placed Warriors but cop 5th placed Dragons in Wk2, Warriors cop 4th placed Tigers).

The weakness of this new system is the reliance on home grounds to give advantage. If Tigers take SFS as home ground again, any matchup against a Sydney team nullifies the advantage. E.g. if Tigers finish first and Roosters 4th, the first final at SFS would mean no effective difference between 1st and 4th - both teams get SFS home, both teams get a second chance Wk2 at home.

Similarly, 5th vs 8th is a knock out, but if the teams share a HG there is no effective advantage.

Bottom line is you want to make sure as hell you are in the Top 4.
 
Week 1 - Is perfect as can be.

Week 2 - What's with the structured format?

The highest placed teams over 26 rounds should always get the advantage.

In this system if the top two teams lose in week 1 the format is:

1 plays 5.
2 plays 6.

How does Team 1 get the advantage as Team 2 plays a lower ranked opponent?
 
Back
Top