NRL Rd 11 *Spoilers

That was fair enough. Can't fault the decision there. But these sin binnings that are for a soft tap to the head are awful.
 
@hobbo1 said in [NRL Rd 11 \*Spoilers](/post/1366946) said:
@wt2k said in [NRL Rd 11 \*Spoilers](/post/1366942) said:
Who had Lolo in anytime sinbin?

Is there such a market ?

There should be a market for the player that is the recipient of high tackles that results in a send off. Tedesco would be shoe in.
 
![e1409483-5205-440c-a210-7b12b6b3daf2-image.png](/assets/uploads/files/1621506720459-e1409483-5205-440c-a210-7b12b6b3daf2-image.png)
 
@hobbo1 said in [NRL Rd 11 \*Spoilers](/post/1366946) said:
@wt2k said in [NRL Rd 11 \*Spoilers](/post/1366942) said:
Who had Lolo in anytime sinbin?

Is there such a market ?

Not yet I don't think. Can't be far off though ?
 
@wt2k said in [NRL Rd 11 \*Spoilers](/post/1366955) said:
@hobbo1 said in [NRL Rd 11 \*Spoilers](/post/1366946) said:
@wt2k said in [NRL Rd 11 \*Spoilers](/post/1366942) said:
Who had Lolo in anytime sinbin?

Is there such a market ?

Not yet I don't think. Can't be far off though ?

Time for ice hockey helmets me thinks ?
 
Honestly this sin bin crap is just destroying the game. A penalty would’ve been sufficient for both of those ‘high’ shots.
 
Back
Top