Ok, So Who's Gonna Win It?

@happy tiger said:
@Geo. said:
@happy tiger said:
Just repeating what Paul Kent said last night

Perhaps a little research in future may be wise instead of spouting what you hear as gospel…. :laughing:

Kids Today,,,

Am I the only one who is concerned how quickly you popped up with all these Manly facts 😱pen_mouth: :astonished:

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Manly+Warringah+Sea+Eagles+Minor+Premiers
 
@Geo. said:
@happy tiger said:
@Geo. said:
@happy tiger said:
Just repeating what Paul Kent said last night

Perhaps a little research in future may be wise instead of spouting what you hear as gospel…. :laughing:

Kids Today,,,

Am I the only one who is concerned how quickly you popped up with all these Manly facts 😱pen_mouth: :astonished:

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Manly+Warringah+Sea+Eagles+Minor+Premiers

But the fact you knew that Manly had actually won the minor premiership hat trick twice to start with ….......

Another Geo cover up coming I feel ................

A few of us have had our doubts about you being a WT's supporter

Your actually Arko , aren't you
 
@happy tiger said:
@Geo. said:
@happy tiger said:
@Geo. said:
Perhaps a little research in future may be wise instead of spouting what you hear as gospel…. :laughing:

Kids Today,,,

Am I the only one who is concerned how quickly you popped up with all these Manly facts 😱pen_mouth: :astonished:

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Manly+Warringah+Sea+Eagles+Minor+Premiers

But the fact you knew that Manly had actually won the minor premiership hat trick twice to start with ….......

Another Geo cover up coming I feel ................

A few of us have had our doubts about you being a WT's supporter

Your actually Arko , aren't you

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_NRL_Premiers
 
@pHyR3 said:
@happy tiger said:
@Geo. said:
@happy tiger said:
[
Perhaps a little research in future may be wise instead of spouting what you hear as gospel…. :laughing:

Kids Today,,,

Am I the only one who is concerned how quickly you popped up with all these Manly facts 😱pen_mouth: :astonished:

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Manly+Warringah+Sea+Eagles+Minor+Premiers

But the fact you knew that Manly had actually won the minor premiership hat trick twice to start with ….......

Another Geo cover up coming I feel ................

A few of us have had our doubts about you being a WT's supporter

Your actually Arko , aren't you

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_NRL_Premiers

Oh God no , now one of our important (Fantasy League champion) Forum members has become a Manly man

Has the world finally flipped out (No pun intended Flip , at least your only a Broncos fan :laughing: )
 
@happy tiger said:
@Geo. said:
@happy tiger said:
Just repeating what Paul Kent said last night

Perhaps a little research in future may be wise instead of spouting what you hear as gospel…. :laughing:

Kids Today,,,

Am I the only one who is concerned how quickly you popped up with all these Manly facts 😱pen_mouth: :astonished:

Manly and Geo are cousins… One are the silver tails, and one is the silverback! :smiley:
 
@Tiger Watto said:
@happy tiger said:
@Geo. said:
@happy tiger said:
Just repeating what Paul Kent said last night

Perhaps a little research in future may be wise instead of spouting what you hear as gospel…. :laughing:

Kids Today,,,

Am I the only one who is concerned how quickly you popped up with all these Manly facts 😱pen_mouth: :astonished:

Manly and Geo are cousins… One are the silver tails, and one is the silverback! :smiley:

Yet still no silver lining
 
@happy tiger said:
@Tiger Watto said:
@happy tiger said:
Am I the only one who is concerned how quickly you popped up with all these Manly facts 😱pen_mouth: :astonished:

Manly and Geo are cousins… One are the silver tails, and one is the silverback! :smiley:

Yet still no silver lining

there is…Melbourne did it in the 00's but alas....

Note 3: On 22 April 2010, **Melbourne Storm were stripped** of their 2007 and 2009 premiership titles and their **2006, 2007 and 2008 minor premierships**, due to long-term salary cap breaches. The club was also stripped of all premiership points in 2010, resulting in a last-placed finish that year.

Same Coach too...
 
Just in between the domestic going on here guys….
I think the Rorters will be hard to beat,however,I think if the Cows put their best foot forward they could be the surprise packet....Broncos need all their stars to fire and they could end up with it....all in all my $20 will be on the Cows for a bit of value...
 
@Geo. said:
@happy tiger said:
@Tiger Watto said:
@happy tiger said:
Am I the only one who is concerned how quickly you popped up with all these Manly facts 😱pen_mouth: :astonished:

Manly and Geo are cousins… One are the silver tails, and one is the silverback! :smiley:

Yet still no silver lining

there is…Melbourne did it in the 00's but alas....

Note 3: On 22 April 2010, **Melbourne Storm were stripped** of their 2007 and 2009 premiership titles and their **2006, 2007 and 2008 minor premierships**, due to long-term salary cap breaches. The club was also stripped of all premiership points in 2010, resulting in a last-placed finish that year.

Same Coach too...

Doesn't count then Dopey , does it ??
 
@Fade To Black said:
Just don't get the myth that 'Storm know how to lift for finals'. Pretty sure they haven't won a finals match since 2012\. Roosters will pump them. The new cheats vs the old cheats….quite a spectacle.

Very selective. Yes that's 0 from the last 3, but they were 3/3 in 2012, 3/3 in 2009 and 14/21 (67%) since 2006.

They are 21/35 (60%) for all-time finals games.

I'm not going to do a comparison for all other sides, but anything over 55% win rate, especially in finals, is pretty convincing.
 
@jirskyr said:
@Fade To Black said:
Just don't get the myth that 'Storm know how to lift for finals'. Pretty sure they haven't won a finals match since 2012\. Roosters will pump them. The new cheats vs the old cheats….quite a spectacle.

Very selective. Yes that's 0 from the last 3, but they were 3/3 in 2012, 3/3 in 2009 and 14/21 (67%) since 2006.

They are 21/35 (60%) for all-time finals games.

I'm not going to do a comparison for all other sides, but anything over 55% win rate, especially in finals, is pretty convincing.

yeah convincing they know how to rort the books.

how many of those wins were with Gi, Folau and a Big 3 in their prime?

theyre getting older and slower, if their last win was in 2012 i dont see why theyd be better 3 years on.

not to say they can't win, they have a good squad and didnt get in the top 4 based on hopes and dreams.
 
@happy tiger said:
@Geo. said:
there is…Melbourne did it in the 00's **but alas**....

Note 3: On 22 April 2010, **Melbourne Storm were stripped** of their 2007 and 2009 premiership titles and their **2006, 2007 and 2008 minor premierships**, due to long-term salary cap breaches. The club was also stripped of all premiership points in 2010, resulting in a last-placed finish that year.

Same Coach too...

Doesn't count then Dopey , does it ??

Ummm yeah that would be what **but alas** means…. 😱pen_mouth: 😕 :unamused:
 
Chooks are specials,the cows are due some luck big time after being rorted two years in a row and the Dogs are always hard to beat in big games. The rest make up the numbers
 
Actually I did look at it, since 2000, you might not believe it but Tigers have best all-time finals record of 6 wins from 9 games (66.67%). It helps when you win the GF on 1 of your 3 finals campaigns.

Roosters are 17/26 in this time (65.38%) and Melbourne are 17/28 (60.71).

Parra come 4th with 10/17 (58.82%), and every other team are 50% or less.

Broncos surprise me, but they did have a few bad campaigns I suppose: 13/28 (46.43%). Even Dogs are surprising 11/23 (47.83%) though they've made grand 3 finals in this time.

Every team has played at least 4 finals games since 2000, with Raiders and Titans are the worst win record, 3/12 and 1/4 (25%) respectively.

Also interestingly, of the 13 teams to make a Grand Final since 2000, 6 of them have perfect GF records (Tigers, Souths, Knights, Broncos, Panthers, Dragons) and only 1 of those has played more than 2 GFs (Broncos with 2). Cowboys are the only single-appearance side not to win, with Warriors and Eels the only other sides to appear but not lift the premiership (twice each).

The teams that have made several grand finals have more modest records - since 2000 only Melbourne has made more than 3 GFs (5) and won more than 50%.

The other interesting trend since 2000 is that the two teams that have made the GF the most times - Roosters (6) and Storm (5), both lost their first GF appearance (ignoring that Melbourne actually won it in 1999, we have to draw line somewhere) and actually make up 40% of all GF losers in this period.

Thus recent history predicts, if Sharks make the GF this year, they are a really good chance of winning it, and I would not be surprised to see them face off against Roosters or Melbourne.
 
@Geo. said:
@happy tiger said:
@Geo. said:
there is…Melbourne did it in the 00's **but alas**....

Note 3: On 22 April 2010, **Melbourne Storm were stripped** of their 2007 and 2009 premiership titles and their **2006, 2007 and 2008 minor premierships**, due to long-term salary cap breaches. The club was also stripped of all premiership points in 2010, resulting in a last-placed finish that year.

Same Coach too...

Doesn't count then Dopey , does it ??

Ummm yeah that would be what **but alas** means…. 😱pen_mouth: 😕 :unamused:

Then don't bring it up :brick: :laughing:
 
@jirskyr said:
Actually I did look at it, since 2000, you might not believe it but Tigers have best all-time finals record of 6 wins from 9 games (66.67%). It helps when you win the GF on 1 of your 3 finals campaigns.

Roosters are 17/26 in this time (65.38%) and Melbourne are 17/28 (60.71).

Parra come 4th with 10/17 (58.82%), and every other team are 50% or less.

Broncos surprise me, but they did have a few bad campaigns I suppose: 13/28 (46.43%). Even Dogs are surprising 11/23 (47.83%) though they've made grand 3 finals in this time.

Every team has played at least 4 finals games since 2000, with Raiders and Titans are the worst win record, 3/12 and 1/4 (25%) respectively.

Also interestingly, of the 13 teams to make a Grand Final since 2000, 6 of them have perfect GF records (Tigers, Souths, Knights, Broncos, Panthers, Dragons) and only 1 of those has played more than 2 GFs (Broncos with 2). Cowboys are the only single-appearance side not to win, with Warriors and Eels the only other sides to appear but not lift the premiership (twice each).

The teams that have made several grand finals have more modest records - since 2000 only Melbourne has made more than 3 GFs (5) and won more than 50%.

The other interesting trend since 2000 is that the two teams that have made the GF the most times - Roosters (6) and Storm (5), both lost their first GF appearance (ignoring that Melbourne actually won it in 1999, we have to draw line somewhere) and actually make up 40% of all GF losers in this period.

Thus recent history predicts, if Sharks make the GF this year, they are a really good chance of winning it, and I would not be surprised to see them face off against Roosters or Melbourne.

I have to ask the question - Jirskyr are you David Middleton? :laughing:
 
@happy tiger said:
Whoever the NRL tell the refs to help

If Melbourne win this weekend I reckon they are a big chance

They match up well against most other sides (Brisbane ,Cowboys and Roosters)

My only issue would be if they faced the Dogs at some stage

Melbourne v Brisbane or Cowboys

Which Genius picked Melbourne ?? :wink:
 
Back
Top