T
tigerbalm
Guest
251 and 70 PCM for Doueihi is great. I cant recall if he had any 60m breaks so they would've been all hard meters. Good effort
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@tigerbalm said in [Player stats V Raiders](/post/1163142) said:251 and 70 PCM for Doueihi is great. I cant recall if he had any 60m breaks so they would've been all hard meters. Good effort
@InBenjiWeTrust said in [Player stats V Raiders](/post/1163060) said:Again not impressed with meters run by our forwards, only Aloiai and Twal run more than 100 m. Packer had another of his trademark games for WT, run 9 m ???, not far from his average for the WT! IMHO, Blocker would be more productive!
@Cultured_Bogan said in [Player stats V Raiders](/post/1163041) said:@formerguest said in [Player stats V Raiders](/post/1163037) said:@Cultured_Bogan said in [Player stats V Raiders](/post/1163023) said:@Geo said in [Player stats V Raiders](/post/1163022) said:@Cultured_Bogan said in [Player stats V Raiders](/post/1163017) said:
Here's the cropped stats from NRL.com if anyone is interested.
Yessss..oh we still lost..
Plus I dunno if it's just me but I can barely make em out
Got to love the PTB speed stat...imagine that guy responsible for compiling those..
You can zoom in once you click on the picture.
And yeah we still lost, someone made the comment the stats were more reliable on the NRL site so I obliged. I can't speak for everyone else, but I do like to look at the statistical performance of our players.
The PTB speeds confirm the improvement of Twal in finding his front this year and conversely, damning evidence of the work Seyfarth needs to do in that area.
I'm not sure if it's just me but I'd have Clark in preference of Seyfarth. I feel they offer the same in attack but we appear to get more workrate defensively out of Clark (even accounting for the fact that Clark has spent more time on the field than Seyfarth.)