I must admit I was disappointed in seeing Brooks walking during the climb
Maybe if he was 110 +kg prop , you could excuse it
It would be expected for plenty of "hiking" during a mountain climb like that.
All the players would have been walking at various stages.
You'd have a lot of fast twitch fibre guys who would be very unsuited to this sort of training (and staff would be aware of it)
Pigs Goose
You run til you spew and then you run some more
All these namby pamby apologist , he has fast twitch muscles , he has an aerobic capacity /metabolism , he has an anaerobic capacity /metabolism
No reason he should have led the hill climbs or at least been in the Top 5
Tell you right now , I bet if Teddy had been there , he'd been in the Top 5 and he has fast twitch
all old school thinking.
when I was playing it was all about what you are talking about, times are a changing, and sports science works. Players are fitter, faster, stronger than they ever have been.
Billy Slater is as fit as you can be, tests the house down in repeat sprints (probably the best in the NRL), but on the long runs not so much, only tests mid field.
If they tried to get him to be an elite 3km runner, it would probably deaden his legs
I have no idea about Brooks' fitness, he may very well not be fit enough, but that sort of training is definitely not going to be suitable for loads of guys in every NRL club who are fit enough to fulfil their roles.