Poor Attitude - Yes you on the forum
- Thread starter Roysta59
- Start date
simonthetiger
New member
@TIGER said:
I disagree.
We will see tonight when they come back from that disappointing loss and smash the eels.
:sign:
king_sirro
Well-known member
Things like that Anti Fizty facebook site is not on. I also am against booing your team or a certain player from your team. I dont care how critical i am of someone, at the end of the day i want them to play great and would never ever boo a tiger. I also remember there was some clown that continually harassed John Morris with some terrible stuff, again, totally unacceptable.
However, seeing faults and areas where u believe the team, club, coaching staff and administration can improve, and expressing it is totally fine and should be encouraged.
However, seeing faults and areas where u believe the team, club, coaching staff and administration can improve, and expressing it is totally fine and should be encouraged.
tiger4ever
Active member
@simonthetiger said:
Your like me simon you never say anything bad about your team you always stick solid and always have.
Not like some on here that only come out after a loss to have a big cry
Exactly. We've won 2 from 3 so the coaching staff can't be the bumbling boobs some people make them out to be. But don't worry they'll all be back after the next loss to point the finger.
@king sirro said:
Whilst personally I am a bit over optimistic about our team and performances each week, I have no problem with attitudes like yours sirro. I think fans can be critical and make discussion about what they would like to change, but to openly boo a player or the team I think is unacceptable. You are meant to support the team, and there is a difference between being critical vs wild accusations and player harrassment. I don't think any fan should cross that line.
southerntiger
New member
@Illek said:
Illek you have summed up what I have been trying to say for a few weeks.
tiger_tigers
New member
@simonthetiger said:
mate he retired from selling nuts … but i still occasionly see him in the campbelltown area whilst im busy working
@simonthetiger said:
No longer "Simon the Tiger" now "Simon the Psychic"!! :sign: :righton:
Balmain_Bug
New member
@Yossarian said:
Yossarian,
Finger pointing occurs when players are picked out of position. Like Moltz at 1.
When the Fonz picks players in their right position, (Like Moltz at 7) we win.
When he doesn't, we lose more than we win.
Bumbling Boobs ?
Thats arguable either way.
southerntiger
New member
Bug
You still cant what Sheens was trying to do with Moltz at 1? That mystifies me.
Whether you agree or disagree, surely you can see that Sheens was trying to develop Moltz's game in that position. Surely you recognise (despite his faults at the back) there are aspects of Moltz's game that are clearly suitable to full back. If he could have got rid of those faults, Moltz could have been one of the top 3 fullbacks in the game (IMHO) and I thinks that is what Sheens saw.
You still cant what Sheens was trying to do with Moltz at 1? That mystifies me.
Whether you agree or disagree, surely you can see that Sheens was trying to develop Moltz's game in that position. Surely you recognise (despite his faults at the back) there are aspects of Moltz's game that are clearly suitable to full back. If he could have got rid of those faults, Moltz could have been one of the top 3 fullbacks in the game (IMHO) and I thinks that is what Sheens saw.
Year_of_the_Tiger
Well-known member
ST, I can see what Sheens is trying (was trying) to do with Moltz at 1, and I think he could be (would have been) a great 1, but I hope Sheens looks hard at what is staring us all in the face.
simonthetiger
New member
@Suzie-Q said:
I guess the moths arent psychic Suze….they only seem to come on here after a loss.
:laughing: :laughing:
southerntiger
New member
@Year of the Tiger said:
Agreed. The future is now :wink:
Moltz could have been a great hole running fullback ala Billy slater, but whether he could develop the defensive and aggressive running back is questionable. I see what sheens was trying, not sure if it would have ever worked, there was potential but moltzen needed more hunger and passion to be that fullback who puts his body on the line. Beau on the other hand showed the passion yet doesn't have the skill of moltzen, and worked perfectly. If only moltzen could have done that then we would have been dynamic…oh well, good luck to him at 7 and beau at 1
AmericanHistoryX
Well-known member
see after a win - the forum has mostly a good atittude.
@Balmain Bug said:
You want to play Marshall at centre though so according to you he's playing out of position. But I take your point and it's fair enough to put your POV. I'm more referring to the types who come on after a loss and open fire but then vanish after a win and don't want to give any of the coaching side some credit.
I thought Sheens tactics were superb on Friday night…
