Positive for and against

@fibrodreaming said in [Positive for and against](/post/1057721) said:
@rustycage said in [Positive for and against](/post/1057381) said:
Playing for a softly fought draw makes complete sense.

That's happened before in World Cup Soccer - two teams that need only a draw to go through to the next round amazingly play a nil all draw.

If we and the Sharks appeared to contrive a draw there would be outrage across the board and not only from NRL headquarters. I'd rather lose than do that.


I have not seen a good old fashioned kicking duel in ages
 
@fibrodreaming said in [Positive for and against](/post/1057721) said:
@rustycage said in [Positive for and against](/post/1057381) said:
Playing for a softly fought draw makes complete sense.

That's happened before in World Cup Soccer - two teams that need only a draw to go through to the next round amazingly play a nil all draw.

If we and the Sharks appeared to contrive a draw there would be outrage across the board and not only from NRL headquarters. I'd rather lose than do that.

I wouldn't. I'd laugh hysterically.
 
Could you trust the Sharks word on doing that.

Balmain trusted Souffs years ago and look how that turned out.
 
Back
Top