Revised structure key to Tigers' prosperity, says Trodden

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guest
  • Start date Start date
@LaT said:
Trodden speaks the truth.

We are being held back by people who are stuck in the past, the sad thing is they seem to revel in being known as a dinosaur. The time has come to get on board, or get out.

Nicely said.
 
@wtfl1981 said:
This article highlights Trodden's push for WT to become a new club before Balmain goes under and control of Balmain's 50% is bought out (most likely) by Ashfield.

A magpies Bundy cup side has NO financial impact on WT. changing from a JV to a merged entity. The WT now have a unified nsw cup team and a pathway from juniors to nrl…

The real reason why trodden wants a merged club is so that it relieves Balmain's obligation as half owner to contribute to the JV that it is currently struggling to do so.
\
\
_Posted using RoarFEED 2012_

Despite what you perceive his motivations to be (to be honest I disagree in this regard, but not my point), do you agree with the principle of a structure that sees the club stand alone as a representative of both club's history and future?
 
Why didn't he try his best to unify the JV when he had the power, or maybe it wasn't a concern then. Should've, could've, would've but didn't.
\
\
_Posted using RoarFEED 2012_
 
@LaT said:
Trodden speaks the truth.

We are being held back by people who are stuck in the past, the sad thing is they seem to revel in being known as a dinosaur. The time has come to get on board, or get out.

Fair enough, let's do the following:

1\. Home games
6 x games at SFS
6 x games at Campbelltown

Sufficient exposure in both Sydney and Campbelltown to satisfy growth areas for sponsors. State of the art stadiums with consumer comfort and excellent corporate facilities.

2\. Feature matches
Heritage round: Brisbane (first team we played in 2000)
Rivalry round: St. George-Illawarra or North Qld

I wonder how many would agree to this? Again, many use Wests Tigers and as per your claim to "get on board or get out" when it best suits either Balmain or Western Suburbs.

Hence the language from Trodden.
 
@LaT said:
Trodden speaks the truth.

We are being held back by people who are stuck in the past, the sad thing is they seem to revel in being known as a dinosaur. The time has come to get on board, or get out.

The thing is, people only tend to ever acknowledge the dinosaurs on ''the other side'' and excuse the ones from the side they use to support. Make no mistake, both sides have them
 
@Gary Bakerloo said:
@LaT said:
Trodden speaks the truth.

We are being held back by people who are stuck in the past, the sad thing is they seem to revel in being known as a dinosaur. The time has come to get on board, or get out.

Fair enough, let's do the following:

1\. Home games
6 x games at SFS
6 x games at Campbelltown

Sufficient exposure in both Sydney and Campbelltown to satisfy growth areas for sponsors. State of the art stadiums with consumer comfort and excellent corporate facilities.

2\. Feature matches
Heritage round: Brisbane (first team we played in 2000)
Rivalry round: St. George-Illawarra or North Qld

I wonder how many would agree to this? Again, many use Wests Tigers and as per your claim to "get on board or get out" when it best suits either Balmain or Western Suburbs.

Hence the language from Trodden.

If we were to do a stadium split which would be best for WT moving forward I would suggest the following

2 x Sunday afternoon @ Leichhardt (ties into nostalgia, satisfies a niche)
3 x SFS (Blockbuster games of larger drawing teams)
3 x Blutongue Stadium ( Best place to allocate some lower named teamms as we have a massive support base on the CC. Would also serve to give a more optioned breakdown of Season Tickets and likely increase our overall count)
4 x CSS. (Derby games where we can. At least one Monday night early in the season as during Daylight Saving it makes attendence from people with younger folk in the area more likely, also maintains our presence in the South West)
 
In fact with the Bluetongue allocation I would play exclusively interstate teams there. Not only would it sell tickets to see stars like Slater, Thurston, Hodges and Taylor but it throws an extra couple of hours in a bus on top of a plane ride which can take a toll
 
@Gary Bakerloo said:
@LaT said:
Trodden speaks the truth.

We are being held back by people who are stuck in the past, the sad thing is they seem to revel in being known as a dinosaur. The time has come to get on board, or get out.

Fair enough, let's do the following:

1\. Home games
6 x games at SFS
6 x games at Campbelltown

Sufficient exposure in both Sydney and Campbelltown to satisfy growth areas for sponsors. State of the art stadiums with consumer comfort and excellent corporate facilities.

2\. Feature matches
Heritage round: Brisbane (first team we played in 2000)
Rivalry round: St. George-Illawarra or North Qld

I wonder how many would agree to this? Again, many use Wests Tigers and as per your claim to "get on board or get out" when it best suits either Balmain or Western Suburbs.

Hence the language from Trodden.

It would suck for leichhardt, but at least for once it would be a goddamn unified course of action.

Something, anything for crying out loud. Dump this us v them crap!

Would you agree to this?
 
@magpiecol said:
@Chunk said:
Hello…........elephant in the room.

There is only one side of the venture holding us back....guess!

The one with the money?

Typical.

The Tigers brand is the Wests Tigers.

Wests are dead without it…wake up!
 
@LaT said:
It would suck for leichhardt, but at least for once it would be a goddamn unified course of action.

Something, anything for crying out loud. Dump this us v them crap!

Would you agree to this?

No. I would like to see Leichhardt retain some exposure.

I would however like to see our feature matches move to those indicated above.
 
WT have 200 years of combined history.. Do we have less rugby league significance than Melbourne Storm? I dont think so…

If we should all 'move on and get over it' ad history and tradition is out the window under a new structure then do we also stop playing at Leichhardt also? Do we stop relying on Ashfield & Campbelltown leagues clubs to back the club financially as they are of Wests Magpies origin? Do we stop wearing victa and philips jerseys as they are linked to balmain & wests?

WT is a business and sporting legacy of Wests & Balmain - thats why it was formed. Even if it reverted to a merged club from top to bottom, the club would need a viable leagues club or private owner behind it. A person or business that has an interest in taking it on. Do we want to be in a newcastle with tinkler situation?

Trodden is a Tigers man from top to bottom.. He wants to see the Tigers brand live on before balmain are declared bankrupt and WT ownership reverts to wests group or a 3rd party private owner.. Highlighting the nsw cup situation as a reason for moving to a merged club is a cover up of the real issue concerning WT - that is the financial demise of Balmain
\
\
\
_Posted using RoarFEED 2012_
 
@Snodgrass said:
@Chunk said:
@magpiecol said:
@Chunk said:
Hello…........elephant in the room.

There is only one side of the venture holding us back....guess!

The one with the money?

Typical.

The Tigers brand is the Wests Tigers.

Wests are dead without it…wake up!

Which Wests is that … I'm confused ?

The half baked mob that rarely if never have had a the full house sign up at Campbo.

The side of the merger which make up less than 40% of supporters.

The side of the JV that can't bring in corporate sponsorship.

That the Wests I'm talking about
 
Alright, before this degenerates I'll say that as long as this remains a vigorous debate the thread will stay open.

The minute personal sniping and deliberate trolling takes place, it will be locked.
 
@wtfl1981 said:
WT have 200 years of combined history.. Do we have less rugby league significance than Melbourne Storm? I dont think so…

If we should all 'move on and get over it' ad history and tradition is out the window under a new structure then do we also stop playing at Leichhardt also? Do we stop relying on Ashfield & Campbelltown leagues clubs to back the club financially as they are of Wests Magpies origin? Do we stop wearing victa and philips jerseys as they are linked to balmain & wests?

WT is a business and sporting legacy of Wests & Balmain - thats why it was formed. Even if it reverted to a merged club from top to bottom, the club would need a viable leagues club or private owner behind it. A person or business that has an interest in taking it on. Do we want to be in a newcastle with tinkler situation?

Trodden is a Tigers man from top to bottom.. He wants to see the Tigers brand live on before balmain are declared bankrupt and WT ownership reverts to wests group or a 3rd party private owner.. Highlighting the nsw cup situation as a reason for moving to a merged club is a cover up of the real issue concerning WT - that is the financial demise of Balmain
\
\
\
_Posted using RoarFEED 2012_

The Tigers are going nowhere, the NRL will see to that, the TIGERS brand is too strong, they are the ones handed out the dollars now, not the Leagues club.

Balmain may struggle but not the Tigers.

Wests Magpies need to face this reality
 
@wtfl1981 said:
WT have 200 years of combined history.. Do we have less rugby league significance than Melbourne Storm? I dont think so…

**If we should all 'move on and get over it' ad history and tradition is out the window under a new structure then do we also stop playing at Leichhardt also? Do we stop relying on Ashfield & Campbelltown leagues clubs to back the club financially as they are of Wests Magpies origin? Do we stop wearing victa and philips jerseys as they are linked to balmain & wests?**

WT is a business and sporting legacy of Wests & Balmain - thats why it was formed. Even if it reverted to a merged club from top to bottom, the club would need a viable leagues club or private owner behind it. A person or business that has an interest in taking it on. Do we want to be in a newcastle with tinkler situation?

Trodden is a Tigers man from top to bottom.. He wants to see the Tigers brand live on before balmain are declared bankrupt and WT ownership reverts to wests group or a 3rd party private owner.. Highlighting the nsw cup situation as a reason for moving to a merged club is a cover up of the real issue concerning WT - that is the financial demise of Balmain
\
\
\
_Posted using RoarFEED 2012_

Why would history and tradition go out the window by moving on? The history won't change, what matters is the future.

If angry old men are going to sit back and cry about how this and that are Balmain/Wests influenced decisions everytime something pops up they don't like, things are just going to go round and round in circles.

I will always be a Balmain fan, but I bought my Magpies heritage jersey and wear it proud. I've got nothing against respecting our history, but there is only one way forward.
 
@Chunk said:
@magpiecol said:
@Chunk said:
Hello…........elephant in the room.

There is only one side of the venture holding us back....guess!

The one with the money?

**Typical.**

The Tigers brand is the Wests Tigers.

Wests are dead without it…wake up!

Whats typical is your arrogant pig headed mentality. The only time you ever pop up is to have a dig at the Pies. Its clear you've accepted the JV. 😕
 
If anyone wants to have a discussion about the issue please let me know.

This is going down the usual path of this forum though so I am out.

Enjoy your niggle fest kids
 
Back
Top