Properossi
Well-known member
Just an attempt to destabilise the mighty Wests Tigers before their journey towards the 2012 Minor Premiership/Premiership!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@TigerDave81 said:Basically that the story was a disgrace and wouldn't eveb pass as a fiction piece. The fact that Robbie had to organise a press conference to defend the rubbish, especially during the difficult time in his life was terrible and that journos need to be more responsible in what they write in regards to the damage to the club, supporters and sponsors it can cause. Obviously they tried to defend him but I got cut off when my point was starting to make them look silly.
\
\
Posted using RoarFEED
@Flippedy said:I was visiting my mum in hospital today and she had a copy of the Sunday Telegraph there, so I thought I'd take a squiz at what crap they were dishing out now.
They will not let this story go! Rothfield (I think) wrote quite a nasty little piece about Farah blowing up at Sheens after missing out on the test match. He also alluded, AGAIN, to the supposed rift between he and Benji and finished off with a low jibe at Benji saying he should be called the CEO, as he has all the say in what goes on at the club (i.e. Moltzen affair). To print this rubbish after Farah and WT management had already issued a statement refuting this BS is the height of ignorance. These people have no conscience whatsoever.
@innsaneink said:@TigerDave81 said:Basically that the story was a disgrace and wouldn't eveb pass as a fiction piece. The fact that Robbie had to organise a press conference to defend the rubbish, especially during the difficult time in his life was terrible and that journos need to be more responsible in what they write in regards to the damage to the club, supporters and sponsors it can cause. Obviously they tried to defend him but I got cut off when my point was starting to make them look silly.
\
\
Posted using RoarFEED
I heard you mate, they basically wouldnt back down…Zorba calling it a mighty stoush....once you mentioned Robbies mums illness I think they realized how low theyd sunk, terminated the call pretty quick after
Then Jimmy Smith has the hide to say ''if you dont like it; dont read it /buy it"....Zorba said "You people lap it up"
It really has crossed a line, I mentioned this in another thread yet laT cannot see my point, we as league fans DO lap it up, but we want genuine, interesting, factual news on our team players and our game, thats why we read, watch, listen...we DO NOT want fabricated creative writing BS!
@Balmain Bug said:But, it is fact that Farah and Sheens are not mates. It is absolute fact.
@Balmain Bug said:The BS parts about the story were that Robbie was going to leave, and that there is friction with him and Benji. Both are absolute fairy tales.
But, it is fact that Farah and Sheens are not mates. It is absolute fact.
@Cultured Bogan said:@Balmain Bug said:The BS parts about the story were that Robbie was going to leave, and that there is friction with him and Benji. Both are absolute fairy tales.
But, it is fact that Farah and Sheens are not mates. It is absolute fact.
It may be a fact Bug, but if they couldn't maintain a working relationship one or the other would have left a long time ago.
And if you knew it was BS about Robbie leaving, why would you start a thread that only served in further perpetuating the angst and division around the rumour?
@Balmain Bug said:The BS parts about the story were that Robbie was going to leave, and that there is friction with him and Benji. Both are absolute fairy tales.
But, **it is fact that Farah and Sheens are not mates.** It is absolute fact.
@happy tiger said:@Flippedy said:I was visiting my mum in hospital today and she had a copy of the Sunday Telegraph there, so I thought I'd take a squiz at what crap they were dishing out now.
They will not let this story go! Rothfield (I think) wrote quite a nasty little piece about Farah blowing up at Sheens after missing out on the test match. He also alluded, AGAIN, to the supposed rift between he and Benji and finished off with a low jibe at Benji saying he should be called the CEO, as he has all the say in what goes on at the club (i.e. Moltzen affair). To print this rubbish after Farah and WT management had already issued a statement refuting this BS is the height of ignorance. These people have no conscience whatsoever.
My whole understanding of the situation ( please feel free to correct me if I am wrong) Was that Farah was named as a likely replacement for Cronk as he a broken nose and was not likely to play . Come the fitness test Cronk passed and was put in the squad ahead of Farah .Couple of things I don't get
Why would Farah get upset in the first place if he was only named as a back up and was covering for a possible injured player who passed a fitness test
Is their something that I don't understand or I have wrong
Robbie said he was upset at the time ?? I am confused Was he guaranteed a spot by Sheens ??
@Flippedy said:@happy tiger said:@Flippedy said:I was visiting my mum in hospital today and she had a copy of the Sunday Telegraph there, so I thought I'd take a squiz at what crap they were dishing out now.
They will not let this story go! Rothfield (I think) wrote quite a nasty little piece about Farah blowing up at Sheens after missing out on the test match. He also alluded, AGAIN, to the supposed rift between he and Benji and finished off with a low jibe at Benji saying he should be called the CEO, as he has all the say in what goes on at the club (i.e. Moltzen affair). To print this rubbish after Farah and WT management had already issued a statement refuting this BS is the height of ignorance. These people have no conscience whatsoever.
My whole understanding of the situation ( please feel free to correct me if I am wrong) Was that Farah was named as a likely replacement for Cronk as he a broken nose and was not likely to play . Come the fitness test Cronk passed and was put in the squad ahead of Farah .Couple of things I don't get
Why would Farah get upset in the first place if he was only named as a back up and was covering for a possible injured player who passed a fitness test
Is their something that I don't understand or I have wrong
Robbie said he was upset at the time ?? I am confused Was he guaranteed a spot by Sheens ??
That's how I saw it too, Happy - Farah in for the injured Cronk. Don't know if Sheens guaranteed him a run or not, regardless of injuries. Maybe Robbie got his hopes up too high, thinking it would be impossible for Cronk to be fit in time and when he was available he got upset, which is understandable, but who knows?
Anyway, my point was that this Rothfield idiot had the audacity to print this second article in yesterday's paper, reigniting the rumours, while completely ignoring Farah's refutation of Ritchie's BS story during the week. I particularly didn't like his jibe at the end about Benji being the 'real' CEO of the WTs either. You could just tell it was written with a real disdain for Benji and the club. Grub of the highest order, imo.