Round 21 discussion *Spoilers

@Geo said in [Round 21 discussion \*Spoilers](/post/1045047) said:
@Tiger_Steve said in [Round 21 discussion \*Spoilers](/post/1045046) said:
Couple of observations:

**1. Becoming obvious that we just have to keep winning. Hoping others lose will not get us to the top right**.
2. Penrith are dumb in their use of Kikau. They just give him early ball and hope for the best. Need a half to go deep into the line with him running angles etc


You don't say..


Starting to think you’re just waiting to jump on my posts.

Despite your ever increasing sarcastic barbs, my point is we aren’t getting any favours therefore we need to keep winning. A fairly simple statement to understand I’d think .

In your words - carry on
 
@Tiger_Steve said in [Round 21 discussion \*Spoilers](/post/1045052) said:
@Geo said in [Round 21 discussion \*Spoilers](/post/1045047) said:
@Tiger_Steve said in [Round 21 discussion \*Spoilers](/post/1045046) said:
Couple of observations:

**1. Becoming obvious that we just have to keep winning. Hoping others lose will not get us to the top right**.
2. Penrith are dumb in their use of Kikau. They just give him early ball and hope for the best. Need a half to go deep into the line with him running angles etc


You don't say..


Starting to think you’re just waiting to jump on my posts.

Despite your ever increasing sarcastic barbs, my point is we aren’t getting any favours therefore we need to keep winning. A fairly simple statement to understand I’d think .

In your words - carry on

Been saying it for weeks...other results mean nothing...

We control our destiny..Win..make it...lose..nope..
 
@happy_tiger said in [Round 21 discussion \*Spoilers](/post/1045055) said:
Didn't watch the Manly v Warriors game ...guessing they might have been flat after the Melbourne game ??

Wobblers won
 
@Tiger_Steve said in [Round 21 discussion \*Spoilers](/post/1045056) said:
Last thing we need tonight is a blow out with Panthers fixing up their for and against.

It was actually a compliment Steve for saying how it is..

Sick of seeing mainly over FB ..Oh Broncos won Penrith win this team wins that team wins..

We just need to win it will takes care of itself..
 
@Geo said in [Round 21 discussion \*Spoilers](/post/1045060) said:
@Tiger_Steve said in [Round 21 discussion \*Spoilers](/post/1045056) said:
Last thing we need tonight is a blow out with Panthers fixing up their for and against.

It was actually a compliment Steve for saying how it is..

Sick of seeing mainly over FB ..Oh Broncos won Penrith win this team wins that team wins..

We just need to win it will takes care of itself..


All good mate. Still fired up after last night’s abomination.
 
@GNR4LIFE said in [Round 21 discussion \*Spoilers](/post/1045062) said:
The only time you worry about other results is when your fate is out of your hands.


I agree with that absolutely but our history suggests we won’t win all games therefore it’s not unreasonable (in my opinion) that we sweat on other results giving us some breathing space
 
@TheDaBoss said in [Round 21 discussion \*Spoilers](/post/1045058) said:
@happy_tiger said in [Round 21 discussion \*Spoilers](/post/1045055) said:
Didn't watch the Manly v Warriors game ...guessing they might have been flat after the Melbourne game ??

Wobblers won

I think seeing that I mentioned the Melbourne game last week I may have mysteriously guessed that by some miracle I knew the score and who won
 
@Tiger_Steve said in [Round 21 discussion \*Spoilers](/post/1045063) said:
@GNR4LIFE said in [Round 21 discussion \*Spoilers](/post/1045062) said:
The only time you worry about other results is when your fate is out of your hands.


I agree with that absolutely but our history suggests we won’t win all games therefore it’s not unreasonable (in my opinion) that we sweat on other results giving us some breathing space

I wouldn’t be sweating on this game. It benefits us no matter who loses.
 
@voice_of_reason said in [Round 21 discussion \*Spoilers](/post/1045066) said:
@TheDaBoss said in [Round 21 discussion \*Spoilers](/post/1045064) said:
That is absolutely buggered


If that happens anywhere else on the field it's play on.

so if i put 2 fingers on a player, that is on his knees and 2 m out from the tryline

its a tackle?? nice
 
@happy_tiger said in [Round 21 discussion \*Spoilers](/post/1045065) said:
@TheDaBoss said in [Round 21 discussion \*Spoilers](/post/1045058) said:
@happy_tiger said in [Round 21 discussion \*Spoilers](/post/1045055) said:
Didn't watch the Manly v Warriors game ...guessing they might have been flat after the Melbourne game ??

Wobblers won

I think seeing that I mentioned the Melbourne game last week I may have mysteriously guessed that by some miracle I knew the score and who won

No Warriors actually aimed up for once and smashed them...Manly played well and flew home late after Blair was sent to the bin..
 
@TheDaBoss said in [Round 21 discussion \*Spoilers](/post/1045068) said:
@voice_of_reason said in [Round 21 discussion \*Spoilers](/post/1045066) said:
@TheDaBoss said in [Round 21 discussion \*Spoilers](/post/1045064) said:
That is absolutely buggered


If that happens anywhere else on the field it's play on.

so if i put 2 fingers on a player, that is on his knees and 2 m out from the tryline

its a tackle?? nice


If the arm carrying the ball is on the ground then yes. The tackle is complete
 

Latest posts

Staff online

Back
Top