Your a stats guy I just read this
The Wests Tigers have now won more games against Top 8 sides then the Bulldogs
It's an interesting stat, I think perhaps a little overstated if we look at the draw.
By a quirk of the draw, Bulldogs haven't yet played Warriors or Storm, i.e. 2 of the current Top 4. Against the other 6 clubs they've beaten Raiders and Sharks, who are tricky opponents. Dogs then had a 2-pt loss to Panthers and a weird flogging by Dolphins. The remaining team is Broncos who have the wood on Dogs this year with 2L.
So their Top 8 form is 2W 4L. It's possible that they lose to Storm and Warriors to extend a poor record, but you can't count a result before it's happened.
Tigers form against the Top 8 is 3W 7L - over Dolphins (early season), Sharks and Dogs. So we've played Top 8 sides 4 more times than Dogs, and obviously not being a Top 8 team ourselves adds an extra opponent because the Dogs cannot play themselves. So basically we had beaten 7th and 8th before playing Bulldogs.
Dogs run home is against 4th, 9th, 2nd, 5th, 7th, which is a tough run. So I would be less concerned about Bulldogs' current form against Top 8 sides compared to their form in this run-home. I am a firm believer that end-season form is the best predictor of who will win the comp. Nearly all teams that limp into the Finals get destroyed and there's a good reason why the Top 4 is so dominant in the Finals period.
I personally don't think Dogs are that good a team and I do think that, per your stat, they make their season banking wins against lower sides. I think they are maxxing out their performances with an average roster, but with a few key elite players like Kikau and Crichton. I rate Preston and Kiraz very highly. Burton can be good. Rest of their side quite meh.
2024 Bulldogs were certainly undone rapidly in the Finals. I think Dogs are getting a little worse week on week, say compared to the Panthers, and I think it bodes poorly for their Finals aspirations.