Round 3 Discussion *SPOILERS*

@mike said in [Round 3 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1154456) said:
@trentrunciman said in [Round 3 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1154444) said:
@cochise said in [Round 3 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1154441) said:
@trentrunciman said in [Round 3 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1154437) said:
where's Ponga???

You bet $100 without looking at the team they were fielding?

sums up my life really

Your comeback might be happening
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

![53c35dc0-335f-421d-b25a-9f29a44e0b24-image.png](/assets/uploads/files/1590911105940-53c35dc0-335f-421d-b25a-9f29a44e0b24-image.png)
 
Poor Ivan :rolling_on_the_floor_laughing: :rolling_on_the_floor_laughing: :rolling_on_the_floor_laughing: :rolling_on_the_floor_laughing: :rolling_on_the_floor_laughing: :rolling_on_the_floor_laughing: :rolling_on_the_floor_laughing: :rolling_on_the_floor_laughing: :rolling_on_the_floor_laughing: :rolling_on_the_floor_laughing:
 
@trentrunciman said in [Round 3 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1154469) said:
knights got no field goal kickers right?
Click to expand...

Mann will probably take it. Maybe Tex Hoy the debutant
 
@gallagher said in [Round 3 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1154463) said:
Our game and this one shows that teams can work themselves back into a game under the new rules.
Click to expand...

Except the Pamfers are rubbish and had more tackles in the Knight 20 to win 20 games...nothing to do with rules..they have had close to 63% possession...
 
@Geo said in [Round 3 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1154472) said:
@gallagher said in [Round 3 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1154463) said:
Our game and this one shows that teams can work themselves back into a game under the new rules.

Except the Pamfers are rubbish and had more tackles in the Knight 20 to win 20 games...nothing to do with rules..they have had close to 63% possession...
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

Panthers should be winning by 20 points
 
@trentrunciman said in [Round 3 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1154475) said:
panthers look better . Making more yards
Click to expand...

They have all game..unless you are trying the reverse malachie..
 
@Geo said in [Round 3 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1154472) said:
@gallagher said in [Round 3 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1154463) said:
Our game and this one shows that teams can work themselves back into a game under the new rules.

Except the Pamfers are rubbish and had more tackles in the Knight 20 to win 20 games...nothing to do with rules..they have had close to 63% possession...
Click to expand...



@Geo said in [Round 3 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1154472) said:
@gallagher said in [Round 3 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1154463) said:
Our game and this one shows that teams can work themselves back into a game under the new rules.

Except the Pamfers are rubbish and had more tackles in the Knight 20 to win 20 **games...nothing to do with rules**..they have had close to 63% possession...
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

That was my point, that the rules won't stop a team from coming back.
 
@gallagher said in [Round 3 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1154485) said:
@WT2K said in [Round 3 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1154482) said:
Golden point ?

I can see a coach whinging at a 6 to go call coming.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

Hopefully Ivan
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Members online

Total: 1,012 (members: 22, guests: 990)
Back
Top