Why do players necessarily have to defend in the same position as they play in attack ?
It’s a very robotic ideology that doesn’t have to be followed to a tee.
For example we want and likely need both Galvin and Latu Fainu in the team, so why can’t Galvin attack as our left sided edge back rower but not have to do the tough defensive role ? Maybe in defence he could play as the left sided centre with the experienced battle hardened Olam defending as an edge back rower.
It’s a very robotic ideology that doesn’t have to be followed to a tee.
For example we want and likely need both Galvin and Latu Fainu in the team, so why can’t Galvin attack as our left sided edge back rower but not have to do the tough defensive role ? Maybe in defence he could play as the left sided centre with the experienced battle hardened Olam defending as an edge back rower.