FARANGALANG
New member
@Tigerpete said:
Aint sheens that does contracts,its Humphreys.Of which he gave tim three years too many.Not tim but Humpty.
Aint sheens that does contracts,its Humphreys.Of which he gave tim three years too many.Not tim but Humpty.
innsaneink
Well-known member
@LaT said:
Sorry
Wrong.
Yet again.
Please dont attribute your fabricated BS to me!!! :angry:
innsaneink
Well-known member
@mtd said:
I explained it already in the other thread
Its not Benjis word….get that thru your head, it was a clause in his deal.
Benji "I **WANT** to play under no one but sheens"
Sheens (apparently) "I **WILL** walk away if we miss the semis"
What Marshall says is his desire....its not all in his control, salary caps, new clubs, player rosters...all have a say there
What Sheens apparently said only concerns him, he CAN do what he said he would.
Nothing stopping him but him.
Its not that difficult a concept to grasp...very simple really
\
\
**pushing them across the forum like they are fact,**
Errr...no....you too are twisting BS my way....at no stage did I ever say it was fact, never did I allude to that.
Find a comment and prove me wrong.
You wont!!
@Defiant said:
Possible but unlikely. Ch 9 have already paid a pretty hefty down payment and without NRL they'd have a massive black hole in their schedule. The current Ch 9 ownership might be stuffed but there are only 3 FTA channels in the country. Someone will want what they have.
G
Guest
Guest
Alrighty, this thread is going to take a turn for the worse unless some members stop getting personal with one another. The childish arguing stops now, or this thread ends.
benny elias should pay tim out benny has cost the WT heaps when making decisions if the magpies should choose to go alone who could blame them currently the magpies have licensed clubs west ashfield ,west luemeah and tennis club and the camden resort golf club also lake side golf club and the cambelltown golf club yet are a mere token in the franchise whereas balmain is based at fivedock bowling club a minnow in cash benefit.
@wtfl1981 said:
I'm inclined to claim sensationalism, but if that is true, it's a massive kick in the teeth for the NRL.
westTAHger
Well-known member
if Tim Sheens does actually engage solicitors, well its his decision. ,
if a lump sum payment can not be made, pay him off over the two years.
like other clubs pay a players contract for a period of time, who is not with them
wouldn't that be better for all concerned.
if a lump sum payment can not be made, pay him off over the two years.
like other clubs pay a players contract for a period of time, who is not with them
wouldn't that be better for all concerned.
Tiger_Watto
New member
It would be cheaper to send some naughty boys around to 'communicate' a mutual settlement?! :wink:
@willow said:
arguing/debating is part of a forum, if we all agreed on everything there'd be no purpose for it and it would cease to exist.. we are not here to blow smoke up each others behinds and tell each other how much we love each…take a chill pill man.
_*edit, the rest wasnt worth it :slight_smile:_
insane, my point is you would find something negative about sheens's decison whether he walked away or stayed… "im glad sheens left, but whatever happeend to the good old days when a man would honour his contract". i dont need to track down your posts, your bias is obvious. confirmed word vs rumoured word.. yet the rumoured word seems to hold more weight in your head, probably cause oyu dont want to lose benji but dislike sheens... anyawy i'll leave it there before we get other ppls nickers in a knot.
@Tiger Watto said:
Bryce would probably do it for free :laughing:
Saturnalia
Well-known member
@Yossarian said:
be a cheap cab ride for him too!
innsaneink
Well-known member
@mtd said:
I make no secret of or attempt to hide any bias…yes I do not like Sheens or Humpreys....
You know what really annoys me though?
Its when people like you and Lat say things like this:
@MTD said:
\
@LaT said:
Despite me posting this below very early on in the other thread….and you guys continuing to post the BS above.
@ink said:
You both coincidentally - hmmmmm
either misinterpreted what I said, or totally ignored it
S
system
Guest
http://www.nrl.com/clubs-to-receive-…0/default.aspx
NRL.com Wed, Oct 17, 2012 - 6:00 PM
The NRL has today negotiated for the Nine Network to make a $30million funding payment under the new broadcasting agreement.
In turn $8m is being distributed across the sixteen NRL clubs this evening delivering on an agreement made between the ARL Commissioners and the clubs last year to provide a 2012 television rights bonus if practical. The payment comes after an intensive week of negotiations with the Nine Network which has resulted in the ‘long-form’ television rights agreement being sufficiently resolved to allow the payment. “From the moment we signed the Heads of Agreement with our broadcast partners we have been working towards providing this payment to the clubs,” ARLC Interim Chief Executive, Mr Shane Mattiske, said today.
“This afternoon we reached a point where Nine was sufficiently comfortable to make the payment. This is just the start of the benefits the new broadcast rights deal will provide to the game’s stakeholders over the term of the agreement but it is a significant step for the clubs. At the same time it is a reflection of the positive partnership between the Commission and Channel Nine who have demonstrated the Rugby League is a key priority for the network. It is important now that we finalise discussions around future club funding and that we address the Collective Bargaining Agreement. We are already in the process of confirming our next round of meetings with the players and the RLPA.”
\
\
That should help :slight_smile:
NRL.com Wed, Oct 17, 2012 - 6:00 PM
The NRL has today negotiated for the Nine Network to make a $30million funding payment under the new broadcasting agreement.
In turn $8m is being distributed across the sixteen NRL clubs this evening delivering on an agreement made between the ARL Commissioners and the clubs last year to provide a 2012 television rights bonus if practical. The payment comes after an intensive week of negotiations with the Nine Network which has resulted in the ‘long-form’ television rights agreement being sufficiently resolved to allow the payment. “From the moment we signed the Heads of Agreement with our broadcast partners we have been working towards providing this payment to the clubs,” ARLC Interim Chief Executive, Mr Shane Mattiske, said today.
“This afternoon we reached a point where Nine was sufficiently comfortable to make the payment. This is just the start of the benefits the new broadcast rights deal will provide to the game’s stakeholders over the term of the agreement but it is a significant step for the clubs. At the same time it is a reflection of the positive partnership between the Commission and Channel Nine who have demonstrated the Rugby League is a key priority for the network. It is important now that we finalise discussions around future club funding and that we address the Collective Bargaining Agreement. We are already in the process of confirming our next round of meetings with the players and the RLPA.”
\
\
That should help :slight_smile:
Demonborger
New member
Yeah that'll go straight to paying out Sheens you'd think
