Shane Richardson

Richo has been cleared by the NRL and can move on to another club after being paid out on Thursday

From the SMH:

Shane Richardson has been given the green light by the NRL to return to the game after they found he had no case to answer over his conduct at the Wests Tigers.

The NRL and Richardson confirmed to Weekend Read that the integrity unit had ended their inquiries and found no breach of the NRL rules after a whistleblower raised concerns that proved unfounded.

“If you haven’t done anything wrong, you don’t have to worry,” Richardson told Weekend Read.

“As I said from the beginning, I did everything with the unanimous approval of the board.”
@Vicious

I guess you have some backtracking and apologising to do
 
Not at all.
If you are still fooled by the used car salesman, that’s on you.
500 pages of the hbg thread are littered with your accusations and it turns out you were wrong the entire time.

Have some self respect and acknowledge you got it wrong.. that maybe your sources had an axe to grind.

Otherwise you are the only fool here mate.
 
It may have been all legal but did he have the clubs best interest at heart or does family come first.
Seems like plenty of deals went to his sons companies.


Would you give a deal to someone you trust or a complete stranger

And if he declares it to the board and the board was obvious ok with it because it went ahead what's the problem
 
It may have been all legal but did he have the clubs best interest at heart or does family come first.
Seems like plenty of deals went to his sons companies.
Do you have any examples where the outcomes indicate the wests tigers interests werent at heart?
 
500 pages of the hbg thread are littered with your accusations and it turns out you were wrong the entire time.

Have some self respect and acknowledge you got it wrong.. that maybe your sources had an axe to grind.

Otherwise you are the only fool here mate.
As they say on Big Brother,"its time to go Vicious".......and don't let the door hit you on the way out,,,,,,,,,
 
500 pages of the hbg thread are littered with your accusations and it turns out you were wrong the entire time.

Have some self respect and acknowledge you got it wrong.. that maybe your sources had an axe to grind.

Otherwise you are the only fool here mate.
Clleared as there is nothing to regulate how much you pay for services.
 
Clleared as there is nothing to regulate how much you pay for services.
You are making the claims, so its time to back them up...

How much more expensive where the contracts with Rich Digital vs their competitors?

And was the scope of work like for like?
 
Last edited:
Clleared as there is nothing to regulate how much you pay for services.
Stump the hell up or STFU.

Seriously.
Richardson cleared his sons involvement with the board.
The board raised NOTHING.
Son is contracted.

then...
HBG moves to fire Barry O'Farrell and independent directors.
Then moves to fire Richo.
Then slings mud re contract with son.

I take and can hear the point that it's a "conflict of interest", it is. I am open to the points around that.

But you need a quote/bill of Materials showing Richardson's son overcharging for his services.
It is then on the directors, ALL OF THEM, to answer why weren't these concerns raised in a timely manner.

If the concerns were serious, they would have been raised sooner. Heck HBG seems more incestious then anything I have seen with Richo and his son

^BTW I am of the belief that NRL needs unique talent. Bringing people in who are family members to get the playing/coaching talent is a part of the game. I would happily make Payne Haas's mum ah Purdue's mum GM if it meant his signature.
 
Stump the hell up or STFU.

Seriously.
Richardson cleared his sons involvement with the board.
The board raised NOTHING.
Son is contracted.

then...
HBG moves to fire Barry O'Farrell and independent directors.
Then moves to fire Richo.
Then slings mud re contract with son.

I take and can hear the point that it's a "conflict of interest", it is. I am open to the points around that.

But you need a quote/bill of Materials showing Richardson's son overcharging for his services.
It is then on the directors, ALL OF THEM, to answer why weren't these concerns raised in a timely manner.

If the concerns were serious, they would have been raised sooner. Heck HBG seems more incestious then anything I have seen with Richo and his son

^BTW I am of the belief that NRL needs unique talent. Bringing people in who are family members to get the playing/coaching talent is a part of the game. I would happily make Payne Haas's mum ah Purdue's mum GM if it meant his signature.
Lol, what's the go crazy, not like you to be fiery and ruude.
 
500 pages of the hbg thread are littered with your accusations and it turns out you were wrong the entire time.

Have some self respect and acknowledge you got it wrong.. that maybe your sources had an axe to grind.

Otherwise you are the only fool here mate.
I don't know why you bother with that Magtard. This thread alone is enough evidence of just how dishonest, bad-faith and narcissistic he is.

You couldn't find a greater example of the Dunning-Kruger effect than @Vicious
 
Back
Top