Signings, Suggestions & Rumours Discussion

bptiger 0 said:
Really not hard to understand, so we reward players for walking out on ur team mates , I don’t care which way u wrap it up I say it’s wrong 😑
Click to expand...
Did he walk out?

I think we took advantage of an opportunity

We don't want him and he doesn't want to be here

We did a deal and it worked for both of us

Other than that we are stuck with the deal Tim Sheens signed him to

What more do you want?

We'd all love him gone but until some other club shows interest in him we owe him what we signed him to
 
phil1986 said:
Mate.

There’s no reward.

He isn’t earning more money.

He is owed the entire contract. We have paid forward portions. Which in turn give us salary cap space later on.

Most clubs will do this in some way. It just so happens our player went overseas for a period in between, which draws more attention to this.

He is still guaranteed the full amount of his entire contract. And now the next two years when we have the extra recruits and are recruiting, we have 200k and 250k extra to play with.
Click to expand...
I think I'm giving up on this one mate
 
A big Hi from Chiang Mai Thailand , seems no news on the comings and goings again , maybe after our presentation night there will be a list of see ya laters and a few new names joining .
i hope we are looking at RGC. He would make a huge difference and he would be able to see who we have coming like Bird , Turuva , Luai , Hunt , that’s not bad for a rebuild .
anyways back to the street food and Tiger Beers
 
The thing with Bateman is if we paid him say $700k this year, plus forward paid him $450k from future years into this year, and he earned $450k from playing in the super league, it means he was paid $1.6m this year. From a cash flow perspective, I don’t believe any player in the history of rugby league has ever had $1.6m of cash flow in a single season from on field earnings only. Not even in the Super League era?

I know the numbers are approximate and I know what has been forward paid he was owed anyway but I am talking about cash flow.

This would be right up there with the biggest rort of the century given Batemans’s output.
 
coivtny said:
I think you're right. Probably Aaron Woods is the exception. He definitely went backwards after he left us. I think the main reason is our players who leave will always go to better teams and will play and look better in quality teams. Tommy Talau is a good example. I don't think he's any better a player at Manly but he sure looks like it.
Click to expand...
i dont get how Woods earned kudos,he was a bludger in the U/20's n never changed,nor has d love 4 him
 
Wiz said:
The thing with Bateman is if we paid him say $700k this year, plus forward paid him $450k from future years into this year, and he earned $450k from playing in the super league, it means he was paid $1.6m this year. From a cash flow perspective, I don’t believe any player in the history of rugby league has ever had $1.6m of cash flow in a single season from on field earnings only. Not even in the Super League era?

I know the numbers are approximate and I know what has been forward paid he was owed anyway but I am talking about cash flow.

This would be right up there with the biggest rort of the century given Batemans’s output.
Click to expand...
Lucky him though

That's just the way it goes

Probably the only reason he did what he did

But it helped us so we needn't care

We allowed Sheens to give him this deal so we have to just deal with it
 
tiger05premier said:
Lucky him though

That's just the way it goes

Probably the only reason he did what he did

But it helped us so we needn't care

We allowed Sheens to give him this deal so we have to just deal with it
Click to expand...
Agree, it was just an observation.

We haven’t paid him any more or any less, we’ve just moved some of the money around.

It was a stupid deal to begin with and even us battlers could see it.
 
JB9918 said:
This is where we need to balance out on who can move on to what we pay.

Either pay out to leave or pay towards their salary at a new club.

Skelton was apparently about $235K. Bird $400K, unsure if the Dragons paying anything, doubt it. Hunt who knows but I'm guessing about $400K as well.

Means we still have $1 mil plus in the cap & whatever we saved this year on Nofa, Simpkin, Kepaoa & Bateman.

Montoya $300K & Hetherington $450K is fair.

So let's hope we can get someone to take a player or two off our hands.

Money isn't the issue. Spots are!
Click to expand...
god bless Walsh 4 taking a haircut,officially,hope our kids realise 50 mill dont go into 30
 
  • Like
Reactions: 851
PabloX said:
As in the rock band, The Radiators? If I'd know I would've been there in a heartbeat. I was on the lake instead, damn it was beautiful out there yesterday.

I generally try and get to Forster BC for Wednesday social comp. It's always a great day.
Click to expand...
I have to admit, I’m one said terrorist
 
Wiz said:
The thing with Bateman is if we paid him say $700k this year, plus forward paid him $450k from future years into this year, and he earned $450k from playing in the super league, it means he was paid $1.6m this year. From a cash flow perspective, I don’t believe any player in the history of rugby league has ever had $1.6m of cash flow in a single season from on field earnings only. Not even in the Super League era?

I know the numbers are approximate and I know what has been forward paid he was owed anyway but I am talking about cash flow.

This would be right up there with the biggest rort of the century given Batemans’s output.
Click to expand...
u b looking at it in the wrong light,contracts n lawyers ,squeeze every cent out of Bateman /his new team ,if they want him bad enough
 
we could send him to our sister team in NT if the fine print warrants it.Bateman wants out but at what price,WT need 2 stand tall n brake him,its pascoes n lee s fault,we need to change etc
 
probably with in rights(small print) to park Sullivan at Ryde Hawks.Think Bennet could unlock him,maybe we just need 2 lower our expectations on our returns from him.Or as bn suggested - eduacate the kid ,raise his value in reggies n shop him 26.imold school,talks like that usually finish the same way they start,with a pointed finger n eye contact
 
Kelce68 said:
Anyone who is worried about, or doesn't know how to identify, a rip, has no business in the ocean at all.

Stick to pools.

We've been surfing D.I. for eons.

Unless there's a monster swell rolling in with a fair bit of East in it, it's normally a pancake and perfectly safe to swim.
Click to expand...

The trouble is that rip areas almost always look smoother and the best place for novices to swim.

Flat as a swimming pool here on the beach in Nha Trang as darkness falls and happily reading that WT likely have an extra $450k cap space to spend over the next two seasons upon restructuring the Bateman deal.
 
Tim Sheens said:
The trouble is that rip areas almost always look smoother and the best place for novices to swim.

Flat as a swimming pool here on the beach in Nha Trang as darkness falls and happily reading that WT likely have an extra $450k cap space to spend over the next two seasons upon restructuring the Bateman deal.
Click to expand...
me dumb - is Bateman go 4 real
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Members online

Total: 3,842 (members: 16, guests: 3,826)
Back
Top