@Red88_Tiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1237677) said:
How is sailors defence. Don’t recall seeing him play
About as good as any other rookie half, not very good ?
Then Reynolds/Walters are better, at least they can tackle. We need players who can tackle.
Until we stop leaking 30 points a game, we’ll never go anywhere.
He is better than Reynolds and Walters.
Walters will miss a chunk of the season recovering from his ACL at best he is a reserve anyway.
That’s a ridiculous statement. He’s played 3 games off the interchange bench at an ordinary team and missed about half the tackles he’s attempted.
There is potential sure, but he ain’t better than what we have.
So many fans seem to only look at the attack.
How is it ridiculous so many fans have blinkers on.
I analyze players on and off the ball, for defense & attack structures outside of the play efforts - always have.
Walters misses and falls off a heap of tackles its why he didn’t last at hooker. Because he couldn’t hold his man. The only thing he offers was spark in attack
Reynolds hits players high as part of his aggressive defense style and gets brushed off with ease, he also rushes up and gets beat every game. Again everyone talks about his energy but that also is in attack.
Sailor hits around the waste, he does arm grab but most kids do these days. His attack is better than the other 1.
Defense is at a similar level for all 3. Sailor age, lack of experience, body growth and skill level is however better value. His defense in juniors was fine. He needs time to adapt to the nrl.
I’m comparing apples with apples, thats not ridiculous because Reynolds, Walters and Sailor are all reggie players. Sailor is already a more value add offering than the other 2.
No to Sailor from me. Prefer Burton, Clifford or Drinkwater.