happy_tiger
Well-known member
@BAGNF05 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1248755) said:@willow said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1248750) said:@tony-soprano said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1248614) said:@Russell said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1248611) said:@4jtigers said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1248596) said:@Jedi_Tiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1248591) said:I can't believe some on here are happy to not make at least a play for Harry Grant if he comes on the market some are content with Liddle and Simpkin, i guess some are happy to finish 9th too
change it up
if we could get Harry and keep Simpkin and land JAC or Suali awesome, if it means losing Liddle then so be it
Liddle has more talent than Harry Grant... Lids has just been injured that's all... big difference in how he provides service... very noticeable... Harry is a good player but I wouldn't say he is better than Liddle... both has strengths and I would back Liddle instead of Harry
Agree Mate - I think he has more talent than Grant as well.
Grant is a better defender, Liddle a better DH and neither have a kicking game at this stage.
If we got Grant, I would be keeping Liddle and getting rid of Simpkin if one of them had to go.
Liddle is average
You're kidding yourself with that comment.
If you ranked NRL hookers he’d be below more than 10 - that’s middle/average
I don't know how you can rate Liddle at this stage
He hasn't played enough back to back games ...and I haven't seen enough to convince me he still has that speed that put him above Brandon Smith as an NYC player