@atown said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1424158) said:
@tiger-tarl said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1424112) said:
@finnzo said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1424107) said:
@tiger-tarl said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1424099) said:
Why not Manu?
To play centre? What would you pay him? I’d go as night as 750 or 800
Centre is a position we desperately need a top line athlete to fill. $750k doesn't seem too unreasonable.
Are we just talking about random signings that we think would be great? Cool, we should sign Cleary as well.
Seems like these baseless, unrealistic pipe dreams should be separate thread.
I suggested making a play at him at Billy Smith at the same time to try and get at least one of them but since reading @facepalmer ’s post I’ve changed my tack on what we recruit.
Let me preface this by saying what we need / want is very very different to what is possible.
We went down the dogs path, albeit with worse signings but with our coach at the time the players we recruited were with a goal to change our culture, instil a winning attitude in the club.
Packer was a becoming a premium prop when we signed him. Just represented NZ so his stocks were pretty high.
Market rate with a top 4 team about 450-500. We signed him for 300k more. Not even signing his good mate Matolino and reuniting him with his former coach was enough of an attraction to come across unless he was getting well paid.
I could say the same about Josh Reynolds. With no other bidders than the dogs low ball offer of $450 for 2 years he was not prepared to come across without us almost doubling the dogs deal in both length and dollars.
So you have to ask why?
Now take Finucane for an example.
I’ve been pushing his barrow for a while as a ‘circuit breaker’ signing but I’ve come around. Finucane is not going to win a premiership here. Not in the next 3 years. So what is the draw card?
He will go for a bit of money or he’ll stay at the Storm. But none of the clubs he goes to will he win another premiership again. None of those sides are close to top 4 teams. Maybe Newcastle could be the closest with Gagai coming across as well but other than money there has to be another attraction.
In recruiting a player you have to understand the players needs. Finucane is a country boy, low key. The attraction of living outside of a major city must be attractive for him.
Like Finucane, Manu isn’t going to give up a chance to play in a top side unless, like someone mentioned he doubles his salary either that our he’ll go home to NZ which you find often players return ‘home’ for a reasons other than the contract itself.
Peter Wallace did this with Penrith.
RTS did this with the Warriors.
Capewell even recently did this with the Broncos.
Look at the Fifita scenario. Arguably probably paid almost double his expected value.
You have to ask yourself what benefit are the Titans getting in paying well over the market in getting him?
Look at what it has done to the team. What are they gaining other than jagging a few wins on brilliance?
I would claim Tino on a lesser salary was a much more important signing for that club.
So what is the attraction for us?
Or more so who are the players that would find playing with us attractive.
Sure it would be nice to recruit a ‘star’ just to make us fans feel better about watching the tigers play but really we need the core group we have to become ‘stars’ in their own right and recruit young and old. Players that will assist with that and not recruit players that don’t have same goal in mind.