Signings, Suggestions & Rumours Discussion

@Mighty_Tiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1285441) said:
@willow said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1285437) said:
@Everything-WT said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1285427) said:
Madge wants McInnes. Coached him at Souths. He and Hartigan met with him and his manager at cafe yesterday morning, McInnes wants to see how things with Griffin go but is very tempted. Tigers around $700K, Dragons currently $575K. Quite confident we’ll get him

That suggests we're not going to bother going after the block of cheese then. 700k for McInnes is too much. Drop it by 150k and you're close to the mark IMO.

Or Smith is QLD bound which is more likely.

Yeah it makes sense. If he ends up at the GC then they're going to have one hell of a forward pack for 2022.
 
@Everything-WT said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1285427) said:
Madge wants McInnes. Coached him at Souths. He and Hartigan met with him and his manager at cafe yesterday morning, McInnes wants to see how things with Griffin go but is very tempted. Tigers around $700K, Dragons currently $575K. Quite confident we’ll get him

So do we want him for hooker or lock? If hooker predominantly, where does that leave Liddle and/or Simpkins?

Is the plan to start Liddle at hooker, McInnes at lock, and when Liddle needs a spell, move McInnes in to give him a break?
 
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1285436) said:
@JC99 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1285435) said:
@Kazoo-Kid said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1285434) said:
@JC99 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1285430) said:
@Everything-WT said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1285427) said:
Madge wants McInnes. Coached him at Souths. He and Hartigan met with him and his manager at cafe yesterday morning, McInnes wants to see how things with Griffin go but is very tempted. Tigers around $700K, Dragons currently $575K. Quite confident we’ll get him

They’re offering $700k? That’s probably overs. He’s a good player but he’s not a game breaker, more a consistent performer who won’t let you down.

He offers more than just his ability. His presence and attitude are second to none. Captaincy material.

That’s true, he’s a fantastic leader. His work ethic is second to none. Could also play some time at lock so we can carry a hooker on the bench, assuming he wants to play hooker which is what I’ve read

He’s a good player but he’s not worth $700k

I think so too. Even $600k is a better price
 
@JD-Tiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1285443) said:
@Everything-WT said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1285427) said:
Madge wants McInnes. Coached him at Souths. He and Hartigan met with him and his manager at cafe yesterday morning, McInnes wants to see how things with Griffin go but is very tempted. Tigers around $700K, Dragons currently $575K. Quite confident we’ll get him

So do we want him for hooker or lock? If hooker predominantly, where does that leave Liddle and/or Simpkins?

Is the plan to start Liddle at hooker, McInnes at lock, and when Liddle needs a spell, move McInnes in to give him a break?

He wants to play hooker is what I’ve heard. Then you can have a hooker on the bench and he shifts to lock

Question is if Madge is looking at McInnes to play hooker, what will he do with Liddle/Simpkin
 
@JC99 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1285445) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1285436) said:
@JC99 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1285435) said:
@Kazoo-Kid said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1285434) said:
@JC99 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1285430) said:
@Everything-WT said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1285427) said:
Madge wants McInnes. Coached him at Souths. He and Hartigan met with him and his manager at cafe yesterday morning, McInnes wants to see how things with Griffin go but is very tempted. Tigers around $700K, Dragons currently $575K. Quite confident we’ll get him

They’re offering $700k? That’s probably overs. He’s a good player but he’s not a game breaker, more a consistent performer who won’t let you down.

He offers more than just his ability. His presence and attitude are second to none. Captaincy material.

That’s true, he’s a fantastic leader. His work ethic is second to none. Could also play some time at lock so we can carry a hooker on the bench, assuming he wants to play hooker which is what I’ve read

He’s a good player but he’s not worth $700k

I think so too. Even $600k is a better price

$500k maybe. I don’t think he’s worth more than that. He’s a pretty good hooker and a pretty good lock. Cheese is much better in both positions.
 
I think he would be a great buy. Not at that price though.

And all the hype around cheese.....that will die off. "One swallow does not a summer make"
 
@JC99 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1285446) said:
@JD-Tiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1285443) said:
@Everything-WT said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1285427) said:
Madge wants McInnes. Coached him at Souths. He and Hartigan met with him and his manager at cafe yesterday morning, McInnes wants to see how things with Griffin go but is very tempted. Tigers around $700K, Dragons currently $575K. Quite confident we’ll get him

So do we want him for hooker or lock? If hooker predominantly, where does that leave Liddle and/or Simpkins?

Is the plan to start Liddle at hooker, McInnes at lock, and when Liddle needs a spell, move McInnes in to give him a break?

He wants to play hooker is what I’ve heard. Then you can have a hooker on the bench and he shifts to lock

Question is if Madge is looking at McInnes to play hooker, what will he do with Liddle/Simpkin

Liddell would have to go, if they think he improves us?
 
@Everything-WT said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1285427) said:
Madge wants McInnes. Coached him at Souths. He and Hartigan met with him and his manager at cafe yesterday morning, McInnes wants to see how things with Griffin go but is very tempted. Tigers around $700K, Dragons currently $575K. Quite confident we’ll get him

That would be an atrocious signing. He's a 500k player at most. He's nothing special. No game changer and we have two potentially elite hookers at the club already.

Dragons fans have said he was highly ineffective at lock and is an average hooker. Trying hard isn't enough, you need talent too. I'd take him as a squad player who had to fight for good spot and be willing to play Bench or NSW cup as required
 
@JC99 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1285446) said:
@JD-Tiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1285443) said:
@Everything-WT said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1285427) said:
Madge wants McInnes. Coached him at Souths. He and Hartigan met with him and his manager at cafe yesterday morning, McInnes wants to see how things with Griffin go but is very tempted. Tigers around $700K, Dragons currently $575K. Quite confident we’ll get him

So do we want him for hooker or lock? If hooker predominantly, where does that leave Liddle and/or Simpkins?

Is the plan to start Liddle at hooker, McInnes at lock, and when Liddle needs a spell, move McInnes in to give him a break?

He wants to play hooker is what I’ve heard. Then you can have a hooker on the bench and he shifts to lock

Question is if Madge is looking at McInnes to play hooker, what will he do with Liddle/Simpkin

No wonder we have problems keeping players.McInnes is a good player,but why? We nursed Liddle because we saw his talent,now he's fit buy someone else? Simkin touted as the next big thing,finally gets into grade and boom we sign another DH,.,Its rediculous and demoralising for the young players,
 
@hammertime said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1285390) said:
Benji won us a grand final. Ted didn't even get us to top 8. Benji is his era wins hands down.

And Pat Richards, was sitting on his banana chair!
 
@Goanna57 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1285393) said:
@AJ1 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1285171) said:
@Goanna57 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1285170) said:
@Tigerbuck63 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1285155) said:
@teddy23 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1284997) said:
@Tigerbuck63 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1284972) said:
@Newtown said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1284787) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1284753) said:
@Jedi_Tiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1284739) said:
any truth to the rumour we are signing benji for one year and letting walters go to broncos

Hard to imagine a more stupid turn of events if true

'Life's not all about money': Benji Marshall opens up on future
By Zachary Gates
2 hours ago

Legendary playmaker Benji Marshall has spoken for the first time since knocking back a monster pay deal with Super League club Hull FC, declaring "life's not all about money". Hopes of Marshall's illustrious NRL career ending on a fairytale note at Wests Tigers were dashed when coach Michael Maguire in August told him he wouldn't be offered a contract for 2021.

And while the 2005 premiership hero was reportedly in talks to join the North Queensland Cowboys on a $150,000 contract, and later Hull on a blockbuster $722,000 deal, neither agreement eventuated. Marshall said he had opted to prioritise family over money. "Life's not all about money and when I thought about the pros and cons, the pros were just about the money," Marshall told Triple M. "If it was about the money I probably would've retired five years ago. "

Good luck Benji your not missed and its not about the $.
Culture is already looking better at WT without having a sook around the team.

When you think Wests Tigers, you think Benji Marshall and vice versa it’s as simple as that... and I don’t see that changing anytime soon

Yes he’s not the player he once was, but that doesn’t mean we should disrespect the greatest player in the clubs history whom had put this team on the map leading us to our first and only premiership, more so respect his decision to wanna play on and wish him all the best and cherish the memories he had once demonstrated at this team and give him the respect he deserves and allow him to do whatever he wishes as we owe him that at the very least wouldn’t you think, I don’t understand why everyone’s so bothered about him believing in himself that he can play another season, it has no barring on us whatsoever if he plays on somewhere else to try further his legacy that’s fine, for all he has done for this club we should support a club legends aspirations not put him down....

I’m not upset we didn’t re-sign benji, I personally think it was the correct decision in terms of this club moving forward however I do think he deserves to be respected and appreciated for the things he has done for this great club, and should be able to make whatever decision he thinks is right for himself and be supported by us fans

Think what you like its your choice, we all have our own thoughts, second time round one things why ask him to come back he never developed any players it was all about him.

I wished him all the best, he was a sook that's not being disrespectful just stating the facts on how he left.

I think you will find he has rubbed a lot of long term supporters the wrong way not only how he left this time but also the prior time as well. Maybe you don't recall history but he was one of the main instigators in having Sheens removed then the following season did not see out his contract and went to play rugby union.

**Herald Sun - 18/07/2013**

BENJI Marshall has walked out on the Wests Tigers _ but wants a return to the club in coming years.

Marshall posted a four minute video on the club's website today revealing why he made the contentious decision to quit.

"It's been a hard time for myself and my family but as you all know I have made my decision to move on from the club at the end of this year. It was probably the hardest decision I have had to make," Marshall said.

"I feel like I have done everything in the game at this club, including winning a premiership, representing my country, captaining my country, winning a Four Nations, winning a World Cup and winning the Golden Boot. Without (the fans) support, a lot of that couldn't have been achieved.

"I feel like I am the person I am today based upon what I have done at this club. At the end of the day, my decision was based on what was best for myself and my family. Not only that but what was best for the club also.

"I know some people won't be happy but some will be happy to see me go. That's life, rugby league is a game and the club is bigger than me.

"I will honour my words about not playing for another (NRL) club. There is no other NRL club for me to play for. The Tigers are my home and will always be my home.

"I have seen guys like Mark O'Neill leave, go to England and then come back to the club. I am hoping to do the same in some capacity after I retire, maybe be involved with the club. Hopefully get back into it somewhere."

Marshall said he was not angry at the club.

"There is no hard feeling between myself or the club," he said.

"A the end of they day they did what they thought they could in the (salary) cap to keep me but this decision goes far further beyond than money.

"If it was in the past I could have take more money to go elsewhere. I feel like I have given my life to the club. Eleven years is a long time. I will never forget the years I had here."

Well he did not play for another club but more than one, was given a lifeline to come back, Madge selected him also to play for NZ after 7 years being exiled.

Lastly 2005 was not all about Marshall there is no i in Team.
Agree Marshall will be remembered for being a great player for the Tigers but he will also now be remembered for being someone that wanted to play on too long as should have retired back in 2018.

Say what you like about him does not take away from the fact
he is the greatest player to have played for west’s tigers

Tedesco says hi

Mate Tedesco is a dog who turned he’s back on the club after we stood by him after 2 bad injuries. He left as he was about to reach his peak so no he is nowhere near our best

His contract was up, he did not break a contract.

Everyone is saying there is no loyalty (club or player) - e.g. Offer Noffo x amount, if he doesn't like it, tell him to rack off.

When a player does it (contract has run out) - he is a dog and turned his back on the club.

Mate! You cannot have it both ways.
 
If we are looking at spending $700,000 on McInnes , someone needs there head read , I would not pay that to get Smith , maybe $600,000 , but we need to give Liddle and Simpkin a go at the spot , we need a backrower or two with that money
 
@Earl said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1285398) said:
@batboy said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1285380) said:
@Earl said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1285219) said:
@AJ1 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1285183) said:
@TSupps05 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1285172) said:
@AJ1 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1285171) said:
@Goanna57 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1285170) said:
@Tigerbuck63 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1285155) said:
@teddy23 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1284997) said:
@Tigerbuck63 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1284972) said:
@Newtown said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1284787) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1284753) said:
@Jedi_Tiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1284739) said:
any truth to the rumour we are signing benji for one year and letting walters go to broncos

Hard to imagine a more stupid turn of events if true

'Life's not all about money': Benji Marshall opens up on future
By Zachary Gates
2 hours ago

Legendary playmaker Benji Marshall has spoken for the first time since knocking back a monster pay deal with Super League club Hull FC, declaring "life's not all about money". Hopes of Marshall's illustrious NRL career ending on a fairytale note at Wests Tigers were dashed when coach Michael Maguire in August told him he wouldn't be offered a contract for 2021.

And while the 2005 premiership hero was reportedly in talks to join the North Queensland Cowboys on a $150,000 contract, and later Hull on a blockbuster $722,000 deal, neither agreement eventuated. Marshall said he had opted to prioritise family over money. "Life's not all about money and when I thought about the pros and cons, the pros were just about the money," Marshall told Triple M. "If it was about the money I probably would've retired five years ago. "

Good luck Benji your not missed and its not about the $.
Culture is already looking better at WT without having a sook around the team.

When you think Wests Tigers, you think Benji Marshall and vice versa it’s as simple as that... and I don’t see that changing anytime soon

Yes he’s not the player he once was, but that doesn’t mean we should disrespect the greatest player in the clubs history whom had put this team on the map leading us to our first and only premiership, more so respect his decision to wanna play on and wish him all the best and cherish the memories he had once demonstrated at this team and give him the respect he deserves and allow him to do whatever he wishes as we owe him that at the very least wouldn’t you think, I don’t understand why everyone’s so bothered about him believing in himself that he can play another season, it has no barring on us whatsoever if he plays on somewhere else to try further his legacy that’s fine, for all he has done for this club we should support a club legends aspirations not put him down....

I’m not upset we didn’t re-sign benji, I personally think it was the correct decision in terms of this club moving forward however I do think he deserves to be respected and appreciated for the things he has done for this great club, and should be able to make whatever decision he thinks is right for himself and be supported by us fans

Think what you like its your choice, we all have our own thoughts, second time round one things why ask him to come back he never developed any players it was all about him.

I wished him all the best, he was a sook that's not being disrespectful just stating the facts on how he left.

I think you will find he has rubbed a lot of long term supporters the wrong way not only how he left this time but also the prior time as well. Maybe you don't recall history but he was one of the main instigators in having Sheens removed then the following season did not see out his contract and went to play rugby union.

**Herald Sun - 18/07/2013**

BENJI Marshall has walked out on the Wests Tigers _ but wants a return to the club in coming years.

Marshall posted a four minute video on the club's website today revealing why he made the contentious decision to quit.

"It's been a hard time for myself and my family but as you all know I have made my decision to move on from the club at the end of this year. It was probably the hardest decision I have had to make," Marshall said.

"I feel like I have done everything in the game at this club, including winning a premiership, representing my country, captaining my country, winning a Four Nations, winning a World Cup and winning the Golden Boot. Without (the fans) support, a lot of that couldn't have been achieved.

"I feel like I am the person I am today based upon what I have done at this club. At the end of the day, my decision was based on what was best for myself and my family. Not only that but what was best for the club also.

"I know some people won't be happy but some will be happy to see me go. That's life, rugby league is a game and the club is bigger than me.

"I will honour my words about not playing for another (NRL) club. There is no other NRL club for me to play for. The Tigers are my home and will always be my home.

"I have seen guys like Mark O'Neill leave, go to England and then come back to the club. I am hoping to do the same in some capacity after I retire, maybe be involved with the club. Hopefully get back into it somewhere."

Marshall said he was not angry at the club.

"There is no hard feeling between myself or the club," he said.

"A the end of they day they did what they thought they could in the (salary) cap to keep me but this decision goes far further beyond than money.

"If it was in the past I could have take more money to go elsewhere. I feel like I have given my life to the club. Eleven years is a long time. I will never forget the years I had here."

Well he did not play for another club but more than one, was given a lifeline to come back, Madge selected him also to play for NZ after 7 years being exiled.

Lastly 2005 was not all about Marshall there is no i in Team.
Agree Marshall will be remembered for being a great player for the Tigers but he will also now be remembered for being someone that wanted to play on too long as should have retired back in 2018.

Say what you like about him does not take away from the fact
he is the greatest player to have played for west’s tigers

Tedesco says hi

I'd take prime Benji 2005-2011 over Teddy now

I wouldn't. Outside of 2005 Benji was incredibly inconsistent most of those years, often overplaying his hand or suffering a defensive lapse.
Tedesco is the complete package. At nine years younger than Benji he has already achieved more in the game.

Tedesco is the better player. He doesn't have the top end Benji had but he is more consistent. The problem is if you don't like Benji as a person Tedesco is heaps worse. He reminds me of a spoiled brat. I bet he was and is a spoiled brat.

Maybe he is a "Winner" Earl - And we just don't know what that and they look like???
Have had time with Teddy since before he made grade - He's not a brat - He works hard and has fought for where he is... Benji is probably more likeable - But the game is there to be won...
I'll take a winner every day.

I understand people's perspective is different. To me Tedesco is a loser and he always will be. A talented guy lacking the character of a champion.

Tedesco is nothing compared to Floyd Mayweather and comparing him to someone at that level is hilarious but the lack of challenging yourself is similar.

If Tedesco is a loser - we need more losers.
 
@TigerWest said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1285453) said:
@JC99 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1285446) said:
@JD-Tiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1285443) said:
@Everything-WT said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1285427) said:
Madge wants McInnes. Coached him at Souths. He and Hartigan met with him and his manager at cafe yesterday morning, McInnes wants to see how things with Griffin go but is very tempted. Tigers around $700K, Dragons currently $575K. Quite confident we’ll get him

So do we want him for hooker or lock? If hooker predominantly, where does that leave Liddle and/or Simpkins?

Is the plan to start Liddle at hooker, McInnes at lock, and when Liddle needs a spell, move McInnes in to give him a break?

He wants to play hooker is what I’ve heard. Then you can have a hooker on the bench and he shifts to lock

Question is if Madge is looking at McInnes to play hooker, what will he do with Liddle/Simpkin

Liddell would have to go, if they think he improves us?

Would he?
 
@Russell said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1285461) said:
@TigerWest said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1285453) said:
@JC99 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1285446) said:
@JD-Tiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1285443) said:
@Everything-WT said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1285427) said:
Madge wants McInnes. Coached him at Souths. He and Hartigan met with him and his manager at cafe yesterday morning, McInnes wants to see how things with Griffin go but is very tempted. Tigers around $700K, Dragons currently $575K. Quite confident we’ll get him

So do we want him for hooker or lock? If hooker predominantly, where does that leave Liddle and/or Simpkins?

Is the plan to start Liddle at hooker, McInnes at lock, and when Liddle needs a spell, move McInnes in to give him a break?

He wants to play hooker is what I’ve heard. Then you can have a hooker on the bench and he shifts to lock

Question is if Madge is looking at McInnes to play hooker, what will he do with Liddle/Simpkin

Liddell would have to go, if they think he improves us?

Would he?

I don’t know, would he?
Appears Madge thinks maybe.
 
@TigerWest said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1285462) said:
@Russell said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1285461) said:
@TigerWest said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1285453) said:
@JC99 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1285446) said:
@JD-Tiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1285443) said:
@Everything-WT said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1285427) said:
Madge wants McInnes. Coached him at Souths. He and Hartigan met with him and his manager at cafe yesterday morning, McInnes wants to see how things with Griffin go but is very tempted. Tigers around $700K, Dragons currently $575K. Quite confident we’ll get him

So do we want him for hooker or lock? If hooker predominantly, where does that leave Liddle and/or Simpkins?

Is the plan to start Liddle at hooker, McInnes at lock, and when Liddle needs a spell, move McInnes in to give him a break?

He wants to play hooker is what I’ve heard. Then you can have a hooker on the bench and he shifts to lock

Question is if Madge is looking at McInnes to play hooker, what will he do with Liddle/Simpkin

Liddell would have to go, if they think he improves us?

Would he?

I don’t know, would he?
Appears Madge thinks maybe.

Maybe it is Simpkin that goes?
 
@Russell said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1285463) said:
@TigerWest said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1285462) said:
@Russell said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1285461) said:
@TigerWest said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1285453) said:
@JC99 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1285446) said:
@JD-Tiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1285443) said:
@Everything-WT said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1285427) said:
Madge wants McInnes. Coached him at Souths. He and Hartigan met with him and his manager at cafe yesterday morning, McInnes wants to see how things with Griffin go but is very tempted. Tigers around $700K, Dragons currently $575K. Quite confident we’ll get him

So do we want him for hooker or lock? If hooker predominantly, where does that leave Liddle and/or Simpkins?

Is the plan to start Liddle at hooker, McInnes at lock, and when Liddle needs a spell, move McInnes in to give him a break?

He wants to play hooker is what I’ve heard. Then you can have a hooker on the bench and he shifts to lock

Question is if Madge is looking at McInnes to play hooker, what will he do with Liddle/Simpkin

Liddell would have to go, if they think he improves us?

Would he?

I don’t know, would he?
Appears Madge thinks maybe.

Maybe it is Simpkin that goes?

Maybe, but doubt it.
Liddell’s injury history will go against him, imo.
 
@TigerWest said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1285465) said:
@Russell said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1285463) said:
@TigerWest said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1285462) said:
@Russell said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1285461) said:
@TigerWest said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1285453) said:
@JC99 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1285446) said:
@JD-Tiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1285443) said:
@Everything-WT said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1285427) said:
Madge wants McInnes. Coached him at Souths. He and Hartigan met with him and his manager at cafe yesterday morning, McInnes wants to see how things with Griffin go but is very tempted. Tigers around $700K, Dragons currently $575K. Quite confident we’ll get him

So do we want him for hooker or lock? If hooker predominantly, where does that leave Liddle and/or Simpkins?

Is the plan to start Liddle at hooker, McInnes at lock, and when Liddle needs a spell, move McInnes in to give him a break?

He wants to play hooker is what I’ve heard. Then you can have a hooker on the bench and he shifts to lock

Question is if Madge is looking at McInnes to play hooker, what will he do with Liddle/Simpkin

Liddell would have to go, if they think he improves us?

Would he?

I don’t know, would he?
Appears Madge thinks maybe.

Maybe it is Simpkin that goes?

Maybe, but doubt it.
Liddell’s injury history will go against him, imo.

Maybe Simpkin never having played an NRL game might go against him.

Who knows what Madge is thinking?
 

Latest posts

Staff online

Back
Top