jirskyr
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2009
- Messages
- 13,876
Not the same thing at all.FFS, I never suggested our NRL team needs to play there. But we have 8 other squads between men and women's comps.
Why couldn't a Flegg trial, a HNWNSW cup trial be played there?
2/3 of the complex is ours, and yes of course I know we don't have exclusive rights to Concord Oval, but as the primary tenant with 9 different squad surely one of them could have had the first run.
Imagine if Bankwest opened up and the Eels weren't playing. Just wouldn't be right
Parramatta Stadium is the Eels home ground. Concord is not the Tigers' home ground. I don't believe Tigers have ever played a match at Concord, ever, not even a trial. It has always been a rugby union ground.
What would be equivalent is if the CoE opened and the Eels had first use of the training facilities. That would be weird. But the ground we don't own and it has never hosted one of our matches.
Next you will be complaining when Souths open their centre at Heffron Park but Marcellin Randwick play a soccer match on the fields.