Signings, Suggestions & Rumours Discussion

Don’t bag the bloke,he’s only 21
Small but plenty of heart,he will be good utility for the bears
He’s been playing first grade at as young fella
Wasn’t bagging him, just reality. I have a family friend who coached him so I know him well from the juniors.

He is a tough bugger and will give you everything he’s got. I hope he makes it over in Perth
 
Adam Doueihi 35% win rate this year.
Jerome Luai 25% winning rate
Jock Madden 40% winning rate.

Do you want the player who has some good individual highlight moments but stifles everyone else, or do you want the pkayer that has few highlights but brings the best out in others and the one we win more games with?

Adam Doueihi was in now way shape or form our best half
So your saying madden was the best half this year?
 
A good offer from WTs to a mid r
Sukkar is maybe our 7th choice prop. I'd put him on a development contract and use his top 30 spot to sign a backup second rower from a club with a plethora of them. Most clubs do actually have back rowers, we should have indentified several throughout the season and targeted them aggressively. Why is it we don't have any back row prospects across our top30 grades? Just Sam and kpp.
It's a bit late to start doing so now, but hey what can you do when you have a bunch of amateurs managing our recruitment
Sukkar provides depth and played a lot of NRL due to KPP's injury. Do you believe a backup second row forward is going to provide more onfield than Sukkar? In addition, Sukkar is on a modest contract so he is good for the bottom line. I cannot recall him playing so badly that he lost a game for us. Sorry but I do not agree with your view on him or Seyfarth.
 
Seriously Odessa… the remark wasn’t directed at you.
There were a few comments from different posters somehow linked together and I was reply to the last one… which said you’d be in Australian for hating Trell.
I know just Sh!TS and Giggles

How are you today mate ?
 
Seriously Odessa… the remark wasn’t directed at you.
There were a few comments from different posters somehow linked together and I was reply to the last one… which said you’d be in Australian for hating Trell.
which said you’d be in Australian for hating Trell.


That part is horrible
 
A good offer from WTs to a mid r

Sukkar provides depth and played a lot of NRL due to KPP's injury. Do you believe a backup second row forward is going to provide more onfield than Sukkar? In addition, Sukkar is on a modest contract so he is good for the bottom line. I cannot recall him playing so badly that he lost a game for us. Sorry but I do not agree with your view on him or Seyfarth.

BB goes on a Sukkar sook and rant every offseason then goes quiet during the year when Sukkar actually plays decent. He wants a guy on minimum wage who is our only backrow depth gone at the age of 21, then replace him with someone who wants to be a reserve grade Tiger. Im sure there are plenty of guys out there willing to switch to the Tigers to play reserve grade for minimum wage lol. Yeah let's get rid of a local junior kid who is steadily improving and on peanuts.
 
Going by results, going by how the team plays around him, yes. Individually Doueihi played better games, unfortunately we cant win with one player. Jock got the team around him to play better. So as a 7, yes, Jock was better, and it isnt even close.
You must be dreaming if you think Madden was the better half. Doeuhi can create chances from nothing. He has gotten way more try assists. Madden has missed twice as many tackles. And you'll probably argue cause he hogs the ball, but is it not good that he is trying to create and actually scoring tries?
 
A good offer from WTs to a mid r

Sukkar provides depth and played a lot of NRL due to KPP's injury. Do you believe a backup second row forward is going to provide more onfield than Sukkar? In addition, Sukkar is on a modest contract so he is good for the bottom line. I cannot recall him playing so badly that he lost a game for us. Sorry but I do not agree with your view on him or Seyfarth.
Yes. Almost any second rower on the fringe of NRL selection will offer us more than Sukkar. He's a backup prop. A poor man's twal.
Our roster is full of plodders, we need strike players that can win us matches. He is not that sort of player. As the squad us already full of plodders we can't re-sign him too. A low impact moderate worker is a dime a dozen in the NRL. Ideally we'd have got Kayliss from the wahs but I'm sure they have many other prospects to target, as do the dogs, Riff, Canberra, newie......

No one else is offering him a contract. Let the market tell you about the demand for his services. He's ok. That's it. A development contract is sufficient
 
Back
Top