Signings, Suggestions & Rumours Discussion

@Fletch said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1208833) said:
My hunch is Bradley’s spot would have a question mark hovering over it.

Considering the signing of Kepaoa, the elevation of Hoffman for that one game and the club openly declaring the intention of adding speed to the outside backs.

The tall Bradley is more of a long strider and was playing in the back-row through the junior grades before shifting to the wing in CC.

Out of all the development guys we’ve got coming through he’s probably got the least potential I think. Just doesn’t strike me as a guy who’s gonna become a regular first grader, maybe he’ll prove wrong though
 
@JoshColeman99 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1208837) said:
@Fletch said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1208833) said:
My hunch is Bradley’s spot would have a question mark hovering over it.

Considering the signing of Kepaoa, the elevation of Hoffman for that one game and the club openly declaring the intention of adding speed to the outside backs.

The tall Bradley is more of a long strider and was playing in the back-row through the junior grades before shifting to the wing in CC.

Out of all the development guys we’ve got coming through he’s probably got the least potential I think. Just doesn’t strike me as a guy who’s gonna become a regular first grader, maybe he’ll prove wrong though

Pretty telling how so many of our youngsters got a run this year, but not Bradley or Dylan Smith. Though Zac Cini and Jake Simpkins didn't either, so maybe I'm reading too much into that.
 
@JD-Tiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1208839) said:
@JoshColeman99 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1208837) said:
@Fletch said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1208833) said:
My hunch is Bradley’s spot would have a question mark hovering over it.

Considering the signing of Kepaoa, the elevation of Hoffman for that one game and the club openly declaring the intention of adding speed to the outside backs.

The tall Bradley is more of a long strider and was playing in the back-row through the junior grades before shifting to the wing in CC.

Out of all the development guys we’ve got coming through he’s probably got the least potential I think. Just doesn’t strike me as a guy who’s gonna become a regular first grader, maybe he’ll prove wrong though

Pretty telling how so many of our youngsters got a run this year, but not Bradley or Dylan Smith. Though Zac Cini and Jake Simpkins didn't either, so maybe I'm reading too much into that.

Neither guy ever looked up to it to me. Hopefully they get a shot somewhere else and do okay though. Simpkin is pretty highly rated so he’ll get his shot eventually, not sure about Cini haven’t seen to much of him
 
@JD-Tiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1208839) said:
@JoshColeman99 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1208837) said:
@Fletch said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1208833) said:
My hunch is Bradley’s spot would have a question mark hovering over it.

Considering the signing of Kepaoa, the elevation of Hoffman for that one game and the club openly declaring the intention of adding speed to the outside backs.

The tall Bradley is more of a long strider and was playing in the back-row through the junior grades before shifting to the wing in CC.

Out of all the development guys we’ve got coming through he’s probably got the least potential I think. Just doesn’t strike me as a guy who’s gonna become a regular first grader, maybe he’ll prove wrong though

Pretty telling how so many of our youngsters got a run this year, but not Bradley or Dylan Smith. Though Zac Cini and Jake Simpkins didn't either, so maybe I'm reading too much into that.

William Kei and Josh Rizk are two of our really good outside backs.
 
@Madge said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1208451) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1208450) said:
The Mole reporting Bulldogs going for Charlie Staines for 2021.

The bulldogs seem to be going for everyone at the moment.

They are the new WT for the DT speculation corner.
 
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1208842) said:
@JD-Tiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1208839) said:
@JoshColeman99 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1208837) said:
@Fletch said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1208833) said:
My hunch is Bradley’s spot would have a question mark hovering over it.

Considering the signing of Kepaoa, the elevation of Hoffman for that one game and the club openly declaring the intention of adding speed to the outside backs.

The tall Bradley is more of a long strider and was playing in the back-row through the junior grades before shifting to the wing in CC.

Out of all the development guys we’ve got coming through he’s probably got the least potential I think. Just doesn’t strike me as a guy who’s gonna become a regular first grader, maybe he’ll prove wrong though

Pretty telling how so many of our youngsters got a run this year, but not Bradley or Dylan Smith. Though Zac Cini and Jake Simpkins didn't either, so maybe I'm reading too much into that.

William Kei and Josh Rizk are two of our really good outside backs.

would you expect either of them and/or Camroux to be on development contracts next season?
 
@Curly_Tiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1208830) said:
@Strongee said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1208820) said:
@Curly_Tiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1208817) said:
I'm not sure who is less popular in here, Benji or Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon
I rate them both

Are you joking ?

No, but that's a topic for another forum, all I'd say is don't believe much if any of what you see on the television or read in the papers
Anyone that universally rubbished (and I'm not talking Benji) must be doing something to upset the status quo which is built on corruption and cronyism and which isn't designed to serve humanity, just themselves and their own self interest

Oh my god please take this rubbish to another thread. I purposely avoid the politics thread to avoid posts like these.
 
@jrtiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1208844) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1208842) said:
@JD-Tiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1208839) said:
@JoshColeman99 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1208837) said:
@Fletch said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1208833) said:
My hunch is Bradley’s spot would have a question mark hovering over it.

Considering the signing of Kepaoa, the elevation of Hoffman for that one game and the club openly declaring the intention of adding speed to the outside backs.

The tall Bradley is more of a long strider and was playing in the back-row through the junior grades before shifting to the wing in CC.

Out of all the development guys we’ve got coming through he’s probably got the least potential I think. Just doesn’t strike me as a guy who’s gonna become a regular first grader, maybe he’ll prove wrong though

Pretty telling how so many of our youngsters got a run this year, but not Bradley or Dylan Smith. Though Zac Cini and Jake Simpkins didn't either, so maybe I'm reading too much into that.

William Kei and Josh Rizk are two of our really good outside backs.

would you expect either of them and/or Camroux to be on development contracts next season?

There was a post about this pages back. I recall they may be the names. The young Aust Schools 5/8 is also worthy if a spot. He is an impressive young player.
 
@JoshColeman99 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1208837) said:
@Fletch said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1208833) said:
My hunch is Bradley’s spot would have a question mark hovering over it.

Considering the signing of Kepaoa, the elevation of Hoffman for that one game and the club openly declaring the intention of adding speed to the outside backs.

The tall Bradley is more of a long strider and was playing in the back-row through the junior grades before shifting to the wing in CC.

Out of all the development guys we’ve got coming through he’s probably got the least potential I think. Just doesn’t strike me as a guy who’s gonna become a regular first grader, maybe he’ll prove wrong though

You never know, just like McIntyre this year. Having beefed up and tried out as a middle player, he has shown enough to at least be considered for an extension. Then you have Smith as the much touted fullback youngster, that has regressed since being brought over. We likely also got lucky with Gibbs going back home and can only hope that we have more luck with the next batch of development players, particularly Madden and Simpkin.
 
What's the difference between Development contracts, and other players playing in our lower grades? Not a joke, but what's it matter which contract they are on? Is it just development contracted players can play FG and the lower grade players can't?
 
@formerguest said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1208848) said:
@JoshColeman99 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1208837) said:
@Fletch said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1208833) said:
My hunch is Bradley’s spot would have a question mark hovering over it.

Considering the signing of Kepaoa, the elevation of Hoffman for that one game and the club openly declaring the intention of adding speed to the outside backs.

The tall Bradley is more of a long strider and was playing in the back-row through the junior grades before shifting to the wing in CC.

Out of all the development guys we’ve got coming through he’s probably got the least potential I think. Just doesn’t strike me as a guy who’s gonna become a regular first grader, maybe he’ll prove wrong though

You never know, just like McIntyre this year. Having beefed up and tried out as a middle player, he has shown enough to at least be considered for an extension. Then you have Smith as the much touted fullback youngster, that has regressed since being brought over. We likely also got lucky with Gibbs going back home and can only hope that we have more luck with the next batch of development players, particularly Madden and Simpkin.

Madge also upgraded a guy called Henry Lealuga-Puhotau into our development squad, was gonna be in our top 30 and ended up quitting. He’s playing park footy now, came to our local club asking for big money and was overweight and a super lazy trainer. Dunno what happened but he chose to leave the big money deal for whatever reason.

Our current development guys look solid but you never really know until they play some top grade footy as we saw with McIntyre
 
@JD-Tiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1208849) said:
What's the difference between Development contracts, and other players playing in our lower grades? Not a joke, but what's it matter which contract they are on? Is it just development contracted players can play FG and the lower grade players can't?

They take up a top 30 position for at least one year.
 
@formerguest said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1208852) said:
@JD-Tiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1208849) said:
What's the difference between Development contracts, and other players playing in our lower grades? Not a joke, but what's it matter which contract they are on? Is it just development contracted players can play FG and the lower grade players can't?

They take up a top 30 position for at least one year.

Train with the first grade squad full time and can play first grade from round 16 onwards (in regular seasons) which other lower grade players don’t do. It’s a good system I reckon
 
@JoshColeman99 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1208853) said:
@formerguest said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1208852) said:
@JD-Tiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1208849) said:
What's the difference between Development contracts, and other players playing in our lower grades? Not a joke, but what's it matter which contract they are on? Is it just development contracted players can play FG and the lower grade players can't?

They take up a top 30 position for at least one year.

Train with the first grade squad full time and can play first grade from round 16 onwards (in regular seasons) which other lower grade players don’t do. It’s a good system I reckon

It's good to read some of our own local juniors linked with possible development contracts.
 
@GNR4LIFE said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1208744) said:
Seriously, if we are going to move AD to 6, we need to sign an established fullback. Since Tedesco has left, we’ve signed 3 replacements. Lolohea, Mbye and AD. The first two failed, and while AD is a better prospect than the first two, I don’t think fullback is in his long term future. It’s why I wouldn’t touch a kid like Staines. We need to go after someone whose proven themselves as an out and out fullback.

AND GNR, that player is......(Drum roll).......
 
PANTHERS GIVE FLYER PERMISSION TO TEST OPEN MARKET

The Panthers have a fight on their hands to keep speedster Charlie Staines.

The Sydney Morning Herald reports that despite offering him a deal until the end of 2023, they have still granted his management permission to test the youngster on the market.

Reports suggest that the Bulldogs and Tigers are among several clubs that are sniffing around.

Staines could play an important role in Penrith’s future with Josh Mansour a chance of finishing up at the club after this current deal runs out at the end of 2021.

His speed and finishing abilities would make him the perfect option on the wing but Staines has grown up playing at fullback.

His chances of taking Penrith’s number one jersey are currently blocked by Dylan Edwards who is seen as the club’s long-term option, although injuries have hampered his chances.

While the Bulldogs have already snapped up Nick Cotric, the Herald reports that former Panther Dallin Watene-Zelezniak could be on the outer at Belmore and doubts over his future could open up a spot at fullback for Staines.

Both Nick Meaney and Will Hopoate could shift to other spots in the backline if needed.

The Tigers have Adam Doueihi locked up until the end of the 2023 season and is currently the club’s first-choice fullback.

They may be weighing up shifting him to five-eighth or the centres though, which would also appeal to Staines.

The guarantee of making a name for himself playing fullback in the NRL is the one Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon card either team could have over Penrith, who are still desperate to keep

Penrith's Charlie Staines is a man in demand. Picture. Phil Hillyard
Penrith's Charlie Staines is a man in demand. Picture. Phil Hillyard
RACE FOR THE FOXX DOWN TO TWO

Storm winger Josh Addo-Carr has signed with a management company as he looks to wrap up a move to Sydney at the end of the year.

He linked up with Crown Sports Management, led by well-known agent Mario Tartak and based in Sydney.

Now, the Daily Telegraph reports that the race for his signature is down to two teams - the Bulldogs and Tigers.

Addo-Carr has revealed his ambitions to give the fullback spot a go next year.

“I wouldn’t mind challenging myself. I played fullback in under 20s and all of my junior footy, too,” Addo-Carr said to the Sydney Morning Herald.

“I’ve achieved a lot of things in a short amount of time that I am extremely grateful for, but I’d love that challenge to try to start a new chapter in my footy career.”

Both the Bulldogs and Tigers have been linked to Staines, who similarly to Addo-Carr is after a spot in the number on jersey and has pace to burn.

It means that if one snags Addo-Carr they will likely not be able to offer Staines the fullback jumper he is after.

Phil Gould recently told Wide World of Sports though that he thought the newfound desire to play fullback could be a ploy from Addo-Carr’s new agent to drive his price up.

“Every month, player managers send clubs their list of players available,” Gould said.

“They list them by position. There’s never a winger on the list, they’re always a centre or fullback.

“Why is that? Because centres and fullbacks get more money.”
 
@Russell said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1208875) said:
@GNR4LIFE said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1208744) said:
Seriously, if we are going to move AD to 6, we need to sign an established fullback. Since Tedesco has left, we’ve signed 3 replacements. Lolohea, Mbye and AD. The first two failed, and while AD is a better prospect than the first two, I don’t think fullback is in his long term future. It’s why I wouldn’t touch a kid like Staines. We need to go after someone whose proven themselves as an out and out fullback.

AND GNR, that player is......(Drum roll).......


We need to get GEO to go out the back and shake his Fullback tree and see what falls out.
 
So the headline says the Panthers are giving him permission to negotiate, then the first sentence it says they have a fight on their hands to keep him. Which is it, cos it can’t be both. What a numbskull.
 
@GNR4LIFE said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1208884) said:
So the headline says the Panthers are giving him permission to negotiate, then the first sentence it says they have a fight on their hands to keep him. Which is it, cos it can’t be both. What a numbskull.

Why can't it be both ..they want to keep him ...but if he finds a deal that they get good remuneration they'll let him go
 
@happy_tiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1208886) said:
@GNR4LIFE said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1208884) said:
So the headline says the Panthers are giving him permission to negotiate, then the first sentence it says they have a fight on their hands to keep him. Which is it, cos it can’t be both. What a numbskull.

Why can't it be both ..they want to keep him ...but if he finds a deal that they get good remuneration they'll let him go

It can’t be both because they don’t have to let him go if he’s under contract. The ball is in their court. They don’t have to fight anyone in that case
 

Staff online

Back
Top